Tom Hiddleston 10 (1000)

1 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-03 12:45 ID:Z/gAwoKf

Thread to talk about actor Tom Hiddleston.

901 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-12 01:07 ID:Z/gAwoKf

The Opinion Dominion shut her blog down. She sent a story to several gossip sites claiming to be a source close to Tom in order to make a statement about how anyone can tip off the press, not expecting anyone to take her seriously. Then The Hollywood Gossip published her story without verifying it, which proved her point, but then the astro blog and a couple others started fighting with her about what she'd done. Between that and the influx of nasty Hiddleswifties who'd apparently been bombarding her with anonymous messages over the past few days, she said screw it and deleted her blog entirely.

That's what I was able to gather.

902 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-12 01:09 ID:Z/gAwoKf

Here's what happened:
http://wthanon4u.tumblr.com/post/147264262185/enough-with-this-shit

crawls back into tinfoil cave

903 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 01:27 ID:vJ8cMe24

>>902 That astro blogger is a bully. There's no need to kick people while they're down, especially those who are mentally unstable. Jeez

904 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 01:32 ID:vJ8cMe24

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3685481/Tom-Hiddleston-goes-solo-jog-Gold-Coast-favourite-exercise-outfit.html

Always good for a laugh:
'It seems Tom likes to keep his active wear simple since he has been spotted wearing the exact same attire whilst running over the past three weeks.'

905 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 01:38 ID:QrAHUnpX

>>902 Oh god that astrology blogger scares me. I swear she's up there with that Shaitana person she's hunting down. Sometimes I wonder if they're both not the same person and this is some other strategy to accumulate TH fans to do her bidding. Bullying someone with severe anxiety...that's a new low for her.

Her astrology predictions are always changing with the gossip rather than the position of the stars. I'm sure this has halted her from making her predictions about the upcoming pregnancy she sees in Tom and Taylor's future. Yeah maybe a pregnant silence on TH's part when asked about his girlfriend Taylor.

906 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 01:43 ID:QrAHUnpX

>>904 First thought "I really hope he washes those daily because oh god ew"

I'm surprised they're not out jogging on the beach together while holding hands. I thought they liked beaches.

907 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 01:49 ID:vJ8cMe24

Best comment so far:
'Taylor is running 15 metres behind him, arms out stretched yelling "Come back Tom. Don't ever leave me, because i'd come find you"'

908 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-12 02:13 ID:34K6L3Sw

>>903 Didn't someone on here say that she was catfished - even to the point where she called the police because she thought the catfisher was going to kill herself over TH? Really gullible people usually turn into very paranoid people who then tend to lash out, hence her attacks.

>>905 Of course, because it's hokum. The sands have to shift.

>>904 I love that they always point out that he's doing something 'without TS.'

909 Name: Sosorry : 2016-07-12 03:06 ID:smT+8KRd

>>908 My goodness! The second that Toms article on the dailymail goes up about him running alone, TSs article about her alleged breast augmentation is posted directly above it! And TS already had the Forbes article posted about her on dailymail as well! Is she just trying to top THs PR, or are they both using marketing synergy to promote themselves, even though overall worldwide people are much more interested in the Swift brand, than in the Hiddleston name. Can't she let his story take the lead for one day? Weird and confusing. What kind of relationship is this?

910 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-12 03:38 ID:w9Q74kZP

>>909 What kind of relationship do their respective PR firms have?

911 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 03:46 ID:QrAHUnpX

>>899 It'd be hilarious if their affair had been going on for months and they go public right as the relationship is done running its course but they realized it too late and now they're stuck doing this whole aggressive rollout.

912 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 03:48 ID:QrAHUnpX

>>909 Maybe she has to be the only famous one in the relationship?

>>910 A competitive one I'd say, that may become antagonistic in the upcoming weeks lol I know your question was serious but I couldn't resist, sorry :(

913 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-12 04:08 ID:34K6L3Sw

She won't be happy about the boob job story. That's not her people. We can expect ANOTHER Gossip Cop story about how she totally didn't have a boob job and the DM is a rubbish paper and it's ridiculous for people to believe anything it publishes...unless it publishes that Tayto is the greatest and most romantic couple of all time.

This is exhausting. I am losing the will to live...for two!

914 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-12 04:41 ID:w9Q74kZP

>>912 I was only half serious. It seems like L and T were forced to (try to) cooperate due to the hormonal overcharge of their clients. Not sure it's working; T is winning.

He can act but he can't answer a question:

http://nymag.com/thecut/2016/07/tom-hiddleston-taylor-swift-interview-answers-australia.html

915 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-12 06:17 ID:Heaven

Shit! TOD was so handy to find all the articles, truly the girl was doing such a great job. This is why I detest TH's nannies.

>>906 I hope so too, what is strange its his insistence to use only that Legendary tshirt that it's not made in a technical fabric for running. Which makes me thing he's doing it for PR and money.

916 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-12 06:19 ID:Heaven

>>915 Never mind, that tshirt is a dryfit one. And he already has booboo
http://ww4.sinaimg.cn/bmiddle/6e14d388gw1f5r086b1x4j213219s1kx.jpg

917 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-12 06:45 ID:Heaven

http://deadline.com/2016/07/warner-bros-comic-con-2016-schedule-wonder-woman-king-arthur-fantastic-beats-suicide-squad-1201785194/

"Warner Bros has unveiled its full game plan for its annual Hall H presentation at Comic-Con this month
Kong: Skull Island
Tom Hiddleston, Brie Larson, John Goodman, Corey Hawkins and Jason Mitchell and director Jordan Vogt-Roberts"

It's on the 23rd at 11:30am PST

It'll be streamed online
https://t.co/A87dNBa220

918 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-12 07:12 ID:w9Q74kZP

>>915 I don't think the astro blog was nannying TOD, it was that astro has a bug up her ass about the Victoria/Shitiana and her shinanagins, believed that TOD exhibited the same M.O. as V/S, and went after her. From where I was standing it was a knee-jerk reaction that turned into being bullied off tumblr.

919 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-12 07:14 ID:w9Q74kZP

>>918 i meant: nannying TH through TOD

920 Name: N8Anon : 2016-07-12 08:14 ID:r3USVgrS

>>905 Yeah I find her really unnerving too. I can't believe she did that to that poor girl. FFS. Grown adults. If you don't like or don't agree, then unfollow, block, whatever. Harassing someone to the point of them deleting their account is utterly twattish behaviour. Pure bullying.

921 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 11:45 ID:vJ8cMe24

https://twitter.
com/TSwiftOffical/status/752828092067045376

Is this a joke?
Surely it's a joke
Fucking cringe... and BALD SPOT

922 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-12 11:50 ID:Heaven

>>921 that's not TH

923 Name: Anon : 2016-07-12 11:54 ID:hOUUKweE

>>921 I don't think that's Tom. Body shape looks wrong and the jeans are loose.

I am close to losing my lunch though. Is she going to spend her time in Australia flitting around visiting hospitals and handing out soup for the poor like some low-rent PR-obsessed Mother Teresa?

924 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 11:57 ID:vJ8cMe24

>>922 It's not a joke though, she's actually doing some PR overdrive in a hospital. What a desperate manouvre to endear herself and appear make her presence valid.
He used to own jeans like that before he acquired a stylist. Maybe he's going low-key

925 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 11:58 ID:vJ8cMe24

>>I just ejected a cocktail out of my nose

927 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 12:02 ID:QrAHUnpX

Pap pics and news report of this hospital charity visit tonight at 9! Because I doubt she can leave it to just fan pics. There will be an article in People and Daily Mail, talking about Taylor Swift doing charity while boyfriend works.

eyeroll

>>924 I really dislike PR moves likes this. Using sick people as a photo op.

928 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 12:04 ID:QrAHUnpX

>>926 I spoke too soon!

929 Name: N8Anon : 2016-07-12 12:07 ID:r3USVgrS

>>926 Jesus christ.

930 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 12:09 ID:vJ8cMe24

>>927 So disingenuous!
I'm going to need hospitalisation if I see this more than once
>>923 You KNOW she is going to spend her time here repairing her damaged public image.
"Low- rent PR obsessed Mother Teresa"- genius

931 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-12 12:09 ID:Heaven

>>923,924 Ugh, I'm afraid that might be the case. Marvel will never allow paps on set, so she needed to find something else to be papped at.

>>926 What would normally be a nice thing to do, if done privately, was turned into a PR project! It's repulsive. TH what the hell are you doing?

932 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 12:09 ID:QrAHUnpX

Not sure how much validity is behind this one but I can see this happening http://www.inquisitr.com/3300062/taylor-swift-begs-for-vogue-cover-with-tom-hiddleston-publicity-stunt-romance/

Anna W will give them a big spread and the interview will be SO EXTRA.

933 Name: Anon : 2016-07-12 12:10 ID:hOUUKweE

Hang onto your hats for the stans to say how wonderful TS is and how not only is it definitely not a publicity stunt but anyone who suggests it might be is one of Satan's little wizards.

934 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-12 12:16 ID:Heaven

>>932 I'm sure it will happen at some point, whether it'll be now or when they split is anyone's guess.

>>933 That goes without saying. We are all spawn of the devil for not seeing she is a gift from God (basically a gift from an imaginary person that behaves like a tyrant...that explains a lot) and I better stay away from CB when Kaiser makes a post about this.

935 Name: Anon : 2016-07-12 12:21 ID:hOUUKweE

I find all of this so uncomfortable. She made some really ill kids happy. For them and their parents that is an unmitigated good. And she does visit hospitals a lot.

But, but, but. Most of her visits apparently aren't made public. Yet this one is, mere days after a month of constant, and constantly bad, publicity for her. Could she not have laid low for a couple of weeks and done the visit then?

Also, let's see if any professional pics emerge of this event.

936 Name: Anon : 2016-07-12 12:26 ID:hOUUKweE

I'll let you guys click through to see which other illustrious star visited the hospital after he got into a spot of bother while visiting Oz: http://www.goldcoastbulletin.com.au/entertainment/taylor-swift-visits-sick-children-in-brisbane-hospital/news-story/95fe2cdf3b0e151ca4ad04a2259c0c95

937 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 12:32 ID:vJ8cMe24

>>936 Oh yass I remember that now. That was also over- publicised. I seem to recall he went in costume.

What's the longest they have stayed out of headlines since this started? Two days... three?

938 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-12 12:35 ID:Heaven

>>936 Ha! Cheap PR is cheap.

Btw, the radio program on Thursday is the same day as the Emmy nomination announcement, isn't it?

939 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 12:35 ID:QrAHUnpX

>>936 Well she's in good company then.

>>934 Won't it be wonderfully awkward if they do the cover but breakup before the release? OR they do the whole cover and interview gushing about how in love and serious they are only to break up a week later lol

940 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 12:43 ID:vJ8cMe24

941 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-12 12:44 ID:Heaven

>>939 That'll be entertaining. Hopefully Luke will veto this.

942 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-12 12:45 ID:vJ8cMe24

side note
This is the same day she was declared the worlds highest paid celebrity

943 Name: ?? : 2016-07-12 12:47 ID:QDqSuP7y

>>940 "their time together has been nothing short of smooth sailing" Well at least they spelled it out for us :)

944 Name: Anon. : 2016-07-12 12:50 ID:34K6L3Sw

Visiting sick children! Well no one who visits sick children would get a boob job or cheat on her boyfriend of a year or use a relationship for PR.

Now everything is clear. Thanks, TS's PR people.

And to Anon's point: it's calculating but those those kids don't care, so it's great in that sense.

945 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-12 12:58 ID:Heaven

>>942 She needed to celebrate.

I don't personally get the fascination with these lists, but pour parler, Calvin Harris is 21st.
http://www.forbes.com/celebrities/list/3/#tab:overall

TH is nowhere to be seen, unsurprisingly, since he is nowhere to be seen even on the highest paid actor list. I wonder if this looks bad in Hollywood, being 35 and kept by a 26 years old.

946 Name: Savvy : 2016-07-12 14:26 ID:7WljYwy7

The big difference between Taylor Swift's ex-boyfriends and Tom Hiddleston is that the others didn't need her money while Tom doesn't have a dime. That's why he will stay with her.

The only thing he owns is his house in London and he's probably still paying the bank loan.
He's films are low budget, except for the Night Manager (and he wanted this one so much that he probably didn't ask for a high salary).
A big part of his salary goes to the agents (in the UK and the US), his publicist, his assistant, and other things we don't know about. No wonder he doesn't have money to buy new clothes!

I don't know why his fans think he's a millionaire. He's not! But he wants to be one and Taylor Swift is the only way to get there because he can't make with his work.

He's not an A-list actor and he's not a leading man.

A few examples of low salaries (including Chris Evans):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/11449841/hollywood-actor-low-salary.html

http://uk.businessinsider.com/hollywood-salaries-revealed-from-execs-to-extras-who-makes-what-2015-10?r=US&IR=T

947 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-12 14:28 ID:w9Q74kZP

Read the date on this article: http://www.gossipcop.com/taylor-swift-dumping-calvin-harris-tom-hiddleston-breakup-split/

I would love to know if this report was the result of paps staking out her apartment in NYC and seeing him, or some other tip-off.

948 Name: Anon : 2016-07-12 14:38 ID:hOUUKweE

>>947 There's been something of a debate on tumblr about whether GC has a line to celebs' publicists. This article is an interesting one - because if that info did come from TS's people it looks like an obvious lie and them playing GC for their own reasons, given that she announced her breakup less than 2 weeks later. Apparently she was on holiday with CH the day the article came out, returning the next day, and leaving the airport in a separate car, leading fans to speculate they had split during the holiday. So:

TH probably hadn't been seen around her apartment at that time as she was on holiday and probably had been for some time.

She had probably already split with CH at aome one during the holiday and also very probably her publicist knew that as of 18 May. Feeding this lie to GC kicked over the traces of when the split had happened and gave them some breathing space to decide when to leak the news of the split.

949 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-12 15:00 ID:w9Q74kZP

>>948 Your last paragraph hit it on the head.

950 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 16:28 ID:QrAHUnpX

>>940 I read on ONTD a family member's account on FB of her visit. She didn't bring a photographer or any media people with her, and let it be known that she would leave if they came. She asked that they wait until she leaves to post pics on social media. It sounds like the children and their families all had a good time and it's raised their respect for her.

>>944 It's smart. Let the people do the work for you. After all the aggressive media courting, I'm going to side eye the hell out of charity visits like this.

Too bad The Opinion Dominion tumblr is gone. I would've loved to read more of that PR anon's perspective on all this.

952 Name: Savvy : 2016-07-12 20:30 ID:7WljYwy7

hahaha I love Mark Gatiss.

https://twitter. com/Markgatiss/status/752072431062360064

953 Name: Anon : 2016-07-12 20:52 ID:hOUUKweE

>>952 He is now the only person in Britain who doesn't!

954 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 21:12 ID:QrAHUnpX

>>951 I meant I wanted to see what PR anon would say about the new pap pics that'll come out.

>>952 Ugh I find it so second hand embarrassment to see these Swifties giving Taylor Swift song recommendations to Mark Gatiss. It's so...cringe

955 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 21:45 ID:QrAHUnpX

Speaking of Taylor Swift and her charity, I found this one interesting http://www.people.com/people/mobile/article/0,,20919466,00.html

Particularly, this part right here:
Beazley's mother said that her daughter's new pal did most of the talking during the phone call Tuesday, telling Beazley how much it meant to her that her music helped the 12-year-old get through painful treatments.

I don't know if it's because the little girl had trouble talking because of the treatments or if she became shy but it was interesting. Poor child passed away soon after because of how aggressive her cancer was.

There's another Taylor Swift charity act I hear about a lot and that's the one where she helped pay off a fan's student loans. I looked it up. She sent her a check for $1989 to help with her loans. 1989. The title of her new album she was promoting at the time. I mean...really? http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6467292.html

I understand celebrities giving up their time for charity is noble and it can help people aspire to be better human beings but there are some celebrities where you can tell it's more about them than those they are helping. Then again I've always had the same issue with Tom and his charity related works. Though he's toned down the self importance since Guinea.

956 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-12 22:44 ID:w9Q74kZP

TOD is reincarnated as todspeaks

957 Name: Savvy : 2016-07-12 23:21 ID:7WljYwy7

Theoanons is back. :)

958 Name: Savvy : 2016-07-12 23:37 ID:7WljYwy7

I don't have a tumbl account and I only started following Tom's careers recently, so all this drama between fans is a bit confusing. I also don't know who is this Victoria and other women named so often is these tumble wars. Should I want to know? Is it important to understand what's going on?
Also, I'm glad my leg is getting better and I'll be back to work in a few days which means less time to follow this Hiddleswift nonsense (thank God!).

959 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-12 23:54 ID:QrAHUnpX

>>958 From what I remember Shaitana/ Victoria was an unhinged fan obsessed with Tom and spent hours analyzing him and his pictures and his facial scars etc etc. She hated all his gfs, I mean HATED. Shaitana/ Victoria herself was catfished by someone on Tumblr and thought she was talking to THE Tom Hiddleston over phone and Skype chats. No video of course. All voice and text. I guess the Tom impersonator told her some unsavory things about Tom like he manipulates emotionally weak women, he cheats on every gf, alcohol and substance abuse, sleeps with his fans, etc etc.There was something in there about knocking up some girl in LA during his Thor days and how she's his only one true love. Lotta weird stuff.
After that Victoria told anyone who'd listen that Tom himself told her he was this way. I don't know exactly how she went about making ppl believe that or how she catfished the Astro lady though.

960 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-07-12 23:55 ID:w9Q74kZP

Victoria/Shatania is a woman who claimed to have had an online relationship with TH, but apparently was catfished by some other fans (no idea who). V/S spread all kinds of info about TH to a number of blogs including thetownbycycle, and also set up a bunch of sockpuppet accounts to continue spreading information about him and other fans she was feuding with.

961 Name: Savvy : 2016-07-12 23:59 ID:7WljYwy7

>>959 That's insane! People really believe he would call or skype some fans AND tell them compromising things about himself?

962 Name: Savvy : 2016-07-13 04:48 ID:7WljYwy7

963 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-13 06:34 ID:Heaven

>>958 she also used MissThing as username at CB. If you wade thorugh CB's posts around Oct/Nov 2013 you'll find a few posts, where she posted this secret information she had (if you want to get an idea of what she wrote about him).
You are right, who would believe such baseless information and fall for such a preposterous story? Probably the same people who believed beanup, the obsessive women like that zhorasomething.
The problem is that overtime she became the perfect excuse for bullism. A blog says something that you disagree with, let's say she is shaitana so we can insult her.

964 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-13 06:48 ID:Heaven

>>962 That thing with Apple is one of the few things I knew about her and I knew it was fake the moment it happened. There was absolutely no need for a public letter and if Steve Jobs had been alive she would never have dared to make a post like that.
The rest, pretty much confirmed what I think about her. No matter the reasons behind TH's choice for this, I will forever side eye him for it.

965 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 09:32 ID:hOUUKweE

Tom retweets!

What he retweets is an article about social media disrupting the truth: https://mobile.

twitter.
com/twhiddleston/status/753155188542742528?s=09

That's a bit meta.

PS it's from the guardian so my guess is he has seen every article it has published about him recently.

966 Name: N8Anon : 2016-07-13 09:51 ID:WvenWMGP

>>965 Ohhhh! Very interesting. He's cracking.

967 Name: N8Anon : 2016-07-13 09:55 ID:WvenWMGP

>>965 Just going to sit back and enjoy the over analysis and interpretation from both factions now. Watch as they both twist it to fit their theories.

968 Name: anonymous : 2016-07-13 10:09 ID:beLz+4VW

>>965

Sorry but the gentleman doth protest too much.

If Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt can have a "private" public relationship without staged photo ops, so can Tom Hiddleston and Taylor Swift.

Then again, Brad was already a massive star and didn't need the extra publicity.

I hope for both their sakes, that Tom and Taylor (assuming that their sentiments ARE real) manage to dampen down on the photoops and the PR crap - any talk of "privacy" and "work being paramount" rings spectacularly hollow at this point... and I write as someone who genuinely appreciated Tom's non-Thor related work.

969 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 10:14 ID:hOUUKweE

>>967 Do you remember the "please love me" Facebook post after Pursegate?

I fear that he is not above using social media to comment indirectly on his personal life, and that this is indeed intended as a comment on how social media has said his relationship is fake. Spare me the irony of (a) using a third party's Instagram to disseminate a manufactured image of your relationship; (b) refusing to speak to the media directly concerning your relationship, thereby perpetuating any disruption to the truth that may be going on; and (c) then using social media again to comment in the most passive-aggressive manner possible.

Even if he isn't, and the subject matter of this first tweet for nearly a month is a total coincidence and not intended as a comment on his relationship, it strikes me as a tad lacking in self-awareness to criticise social media when you are in bed with social media.

970 Name: N8Anon : 2016-07-13 10:23 ID:WvenWMGP

>>969 Yes, yes and YES! The hypocrisy is staggering. He's either being weirdly delusional or calculatingly manipulative. delete as appropriate depending on your mood, hormones, level of caffeination, sense of investment. Yadda, yadda, yadda

This whole thing is curiouser by the day. I sense a frantic scrabbling for control of the narrative here. What do you think?

971 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-13 10:25 ID:fKl7mYc+

Seneca #2

What a colossal second-handed meta- whinge.
Playing the victimisation card like someone else we know...

972 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-13 10:29 ID:fKl7mYc+

>>969 >>970 There's no way he's delusional- not the man who studied Ballard.
I imagine trying to explain this concept to Tay Tay was challenging

973 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 10:35 ID:hOUUKweE

>>971 "A colossal second-handed meta whinge"

LOL LOL LOL!

>>970 >>972 Of course he is doing this deliberately. Of course he is scrabbling to control the narrative. Of course he has dropped the ball. Again.

974 Name: anonsy : 2016-07-13 10:43 ID:Z/gAwoKf

Just saw Tom's tweet and knew there would be good discussion over here. :)

The Guardian article's commentary on "clickbait journalism" is relevant to a lot of the gossip sites that are publishing headlines like "Tom and Taylor already talking marriage and family! She thinks he'll be a great dad!" compete with plenty of unverified "sources" (also mentioned in the Guardian piece).

>>969 Maybe it's some sort of cry for help. "I know we were canoodling on Instagram, but please stop reposting the photos! It's not what it looks like!" All joking aside, I do think it's important to note that the "real" media has been just as skeptical as social media regarding the legitimacy of this relationship, if not moreso. Plus there's a large number of Swifties and Hiddlestoners all over Twitter, Instagram, and Tumblr who are already planning the TayTo wedding and making face-morphs of what their future children will look like (yes, this happened), so it's not like the response has been one-sided in favor of PR stunt. Tom is surely aware of all this, so if his intention is to criticize the denial of Hiddleswift on social media, well then he's really lost it.

975 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 11:00 ID:hOUUKweE

What a fucking bunch of nutters: http://booksandcatslover.tumblr.com/post/147336506886/amjjones-zhora-salome

If you can't be bothered to pollute your eyes, the party line is that this is a brilliant effort on Tom's part to call us out, and anyone who says otherwise is in denial about the relationship in the manner of Cumberbatch baby doubters.

976 Name: N8Anon : 2016-07-13 11:02 ID:WvenWMGP

Actual comments from tumblr right now:
"The article is excellent read to everyone atm. I believe he is sending us a message rn"
"Yes. Isn’t it awesome? Making a comment without making a comment."
"Tom basically just called out the media in the classiest way ever."
"Not just the media. Social media as well. And most of all his own fans. Or those that still insist on calling themselves that. "

977 Name: N8Anon : 2016-07-13 11:02 ID:WvenWMGP

>>975 Jinx!

978 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-13 11:03 ID:fKl7mYc+

https://twitter.
com/sweetlouise83/status/753179877323448320

Isn't this the French anal sucker that shares follicles with TH?

979 Name: N8Anon : 2016-07-13 11:08 ID:WvenWMGP

>>978 yes and one of her cronies

980 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 11:09 ID:hOUUKweE

>>977 Haha!

981 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-13 11:11 ID:Heaven

>>969 Yes, you are quite right, let's say he was referring to how social media were complicit in swaying votes for Brexit, considering his personal/PR situation right now, he could have been more precise.

But I think we said in the previous thread that he would play the victim part because he has a tendency to be passive aggressive, we are just missing the puppy eyes.

It's like a loophole, the more he strives to indirectly insist that this is real, the more fake it is. Catch22.

982 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 11:12 ID:hOUUKweE

>>978 You're on fire today Anonon.

I wish you were doing the makeup on Thor 3. I'd love to be a fly on the wall when TayTay shows up on set.

983 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-13 11:14 ID:Heaven

>>974 It's ironic he is using The Guardian for this, the same paper that dragged him 3,4 times.

>>975 LOL what a bunch of suckers.

>>978 hahahaa, yeah that's her, she was always a #1 brown-noser.

984 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-13 11:17 ID:fKl7mYc+

>>975 >>976 I resent being aligned with baby doubters. Surely that is the point. I will avoid tumblr for a while longer which is not hard atm- it has become a fanatical party line now that all the level- headed sceptics have been silenced.

>>974 I very much doubt TH has been bothered by fervent shippers. What would sting is the blatant and public mockery from both respected peers and publications, calling into line his integrity.
He is still blindsighted to his own part in this pantomime it would seem and far too quick to blame the media for not sticking to his preferred narrative. Yes, some ludicrous theories have surfaced which could have been laughed off if he hadn't orchestrated/ willingly colluded in the worlds greatest and most blatant public love parade

985 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 11:22 ID:hOUUKweE

>>984 It's the classic rhetorical pose of claiming that your enemy is saying something different, and usually much more implausible, than they are actually saying. You then respond to that non-existent argument.

People aren't saying that he posted this and he is thereby showing us his relationship doesn't exist. That's the argument the loons are responding to, hence calling us all Cumberbaby doubters.

People are saying something much simpler: don't get in bed with Satan and complain your toes got hot.

986 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-13 11:23 ID:Heaven

>>984 exactly, it's not the comments on gossip websites, or tumblr that are annoying to him, it's the serious press slashing him. But instead of doing a mea culpa he accuses them of being shallow. A man who wore a I<3TS tantop.

This is why I don't believe there is a single piece of genuine feeling. He might like her the way he likes collegues he works with (Natalie Portman though, not Jessica Chastain), but not a gf. He is too self-aware and not enough joyful and gushing.

I still hope Phillip Schofield was right and this is a ruse.

987 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-13 11:25 ID:Heaven

The gifs people are posting in reply to this RT are hilarious!

988 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-13 11:27 ID:fKl7mYc+

>>982 It's for the best I'm not working on Thor 3. Aside from the fact I have just been offered a much better job I would have found it impossible to contain my mirth and 'accidentally' poke him in the eye with a brush.
>>983 Makes you wonder if the author, Kath Viner, is horrified to have her article aligned with TH and his love parade

989 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-13 11:32 ID:fKl7mYc+

>>985 I've always had hot toes and an affiliation with Satan.

I feel like his mother isn't playing her part so I will do it for her; man up, own your shit, grow a pair and quit your whingeing Thomas!

990 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 11:34 ID:hOUUKweE

>>987 Sorry in response to whose retweet?

991 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-13 11:34 ID:Heaven

>>988 hahaha maybe she'll do another article talking about how celebs manipulate social media.

I hope he knows that not matters what he tweets/RT, his theatre cred is gone, he will never go back to be a beloved of the critics as he was before.

992 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-13 11:35 ID:Heaven

>>990 his RT of that article

993 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-13 11:38 ID:fKl7mYc+

Oh halp

https://twitter.
com/beboxmusic/status/753191124584587264

994 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 11:40 ID:hOUUKweE

>>992 Sorry - was only looking at the replies on his page, the retweets are great!

995 Name: N8Anon : 2016-07-13 11:56 ID:pHtASQDM

>>994 I'm being a doofus, how do I see the RTs

996 Name: Anon : 2016-07-13 12:02 ID:hOUUKweE

>>995 I just looked at the list of tweets mentioning TH.

998 Name: Anonon : 2016-07-13 12:10 ID:vJ8cMe24

>>997 I was just about to post that. They made the cover too, hmm. Surely she's up the duff

999 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-07-13 12:12 ID:Heaven

Ok, I've read the whole article and I stick to my first comment, since the article is part Brexit part social media and news, he should have been more precise, or not RT it. This way he comes off as a complete hypocrite. Again.

It's funny though that his stans and nannies are the one that immediately made it about his personal life. It never occurred to them he might be referring to something more serious.

1000 Name: NewAnon : 2016-07-13 12:18 ID:QrAHUnpX

When I saw his retweet, I couldn't decide if he was really that obtuse or whether he believes his fans are that obtuse. Then I read the comments on tumblr...

I bet he was pretty confident the negativity and doubts about the relationship would die out but now he sees that majority refuses to buy the happy couple narrative, he's going to be passive aggressive and misquote intelligent think pieces to fit his agenda. I refuse to believe Tom is that naive that he would be tweeting this article as a commentary on the current political social scene. This is a man who researches his roles as if he were writing a dissertation on them. He's calculated. Maybe he really is terrified that he'll get booed at Comic Con and this is him trying to rally back the troops and saying "don't believe all you hear in the media, I am really just blowing off steam and was never serious about Taylor, that's why I said I can't speak for her and would rather talk about my work."

eyeroll I think I lost even more respect for him, not that there's much there left anymore.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.