ITT we solve the question above us [Part 5] (999)

697 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6990 17:00

>>696
I was reading some rationalist site (Less Wrong, maybe) where someone mentioned how polyamorous relationships are common among rationalists because monogamy is fairly artificial, and usually governed by religion or archaic laws. I thought it was interesting and I largely agree--it should certainly be legal and accepted--but it wouldn't be for me. I'm too neurotic and jealous. I would rather focus my romantic efforts on one person, and if he or she was dating other people as well, I would feel all paranoid and insecure.
Perhaps I would try it, given the chance, but I don't think it would work out.

>>698
If you could change one thing about your appearance, what would it be?

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.