Tom Hiddleston 6 (1000)

1 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-08 09:53 ID:Heaven

201 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 23:55 ID:xdK7WmeT

>>196 Maybe, maybe. I've been around the block enough to have seen that with that type of man it is rarely the "endlessly available" girl who does the taming. Men who never have to chase tend mostly to be entranced by the woman they have to chase.

202 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 23:57 ID:xdK7WmeT

>>198 Indiana.

203 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-11 23:58 ID:RuxZSXOx

>>199 If she was at the TCA event then someone surely would have seen her. If Annony's story is indeed true then she must have been hanging around town waiting for him to finish. How boring.

204 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 23:59 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>197 They both sort of denied it. She did it outright, but in a joint interview, he implied it - or at least didn't disagree when asked if they were just friends.

Why or why? They should have said 'no comment' or structured the interviews to stay away from their private lives.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say...drum roll...this looks like a relationship. Long distance, casual, but something a step or two above just FWB. Now whether they're on the same step...ummm, see >>196.

205 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 00:02 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>202 Okay, now I understand. In Indiana, you HAVE to drive 2 hours for decent pizza.

206 Name: qaz : 2016-01-12 00:03 ID:wxE9Uiiq

>>192 Thanks for sharing, Annony!

>>193 Yeah, it was me with the too committal thing :) Sure, the money is not a problem for her, I agree, and she does seem to put more effort than he. But for me it's probably not so much her visit to HI, but the fact that they spent time together with his friends/colleagues, plus all the sightings, plus all those tabloid stories... Of course I can be wrong, it's all just guess-work. We'll have to wait and see!

Oh, and although I think that it may be something more than FWB, I don't really see them ending up together. I can imagine 'dating' of sorts for some time and then a break up. But then again, who knows, they may surprise us!

207 Name: Anon : 2016-01-12 00:05 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>204 Yes I remember. In retrospect his "implied" denial is closer to a "no comment" than people believed at the time, due to her having done the dirty work with the outright denial.

Yes, I agree that "no comment" was the only way to go. Some of the madder nannies are accusing anyone expressing an interest of "acting entitled", but really! You create that sense of entitlement by drawing attention in May 15 to a relationship that nobody had rumbled, and then by pap night and the denials etc.

208 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-12 00:05 ID:RuxZSXOx

(Putting this out there, if Tom Hiddleston was my FWB and I had a million dollars and no work to do, I'd sure as hell fly out to Hawaii to see him for a day, regardless of whether or not I thought the relationship was going to get more serious.)

209 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-12 00:07 ID:RuxZSXOx

>>207 I swear there was another interview from TIFF where the author mentioned asking Tom if he was single and getting a definite yes from him, but I can't find it anywhere.

210 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 00:09 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>192 >>199 >>203 If it was Friday morning, the TCA was held at a hotel (a very nice hotel) in Pasadena, so I can imagine that he stayed with her after arriving - maybe she even did the airport run (in that case she is WAY more invested - ugh, the LAX airport run!). His driver picks him up at her place, she tags along, waits in his hotel room during his press work, and then...party time!

Off to write some THEO fanfiction....

211 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-12 00:10 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>203 lol that seems to be her thing though. Hanging around Tom to finish up whatever he's doing so they could spend time together.

>>206 Could be a slow burn type of relationship. If he's not hiding her from his colleagues and friends, then he's probably not ashamed of being seen with her. Then it's a regular relationship then that's taking longer to run its course since TH is busy working and can't spend long amounts of time with her unless EO is the one making the effort to come see him.

212 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-12 00:11 ID:RuxZSXOx

Oh, and a personal anecdote - I had a good friend who was in a FWB relationship for a bit more than half a year... at least that's what he thought. She was going around telling people he was her boyfriend and even bitched some other girl out for getting too close to him. A mutual friend confronted her about it and she admitted that she had developed feelings for him and thought she could shift the relationship into something more serious, but it went terribly wrong. These were adult people, mid-twenties. It happens.

213 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 00:14 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>208 Internet high-rive coming anonsy's way! Also speaking truth to power!

214 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 00:15 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>213 Or even a high-five!

215 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 00:18 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>207 Well, going back to that May 15 article, we had decided that this was EO's work, as USWeekly is her mag of choice - exclusives with her engagement, end of engagement.

Maybe since she leaked, she had to do the outright lying at TIFF when they decided to pull the turtle's head in.

216 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-12 00:21 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>212 That's what I've mostly seen in FWBs. One party is usually always more emotionally invested and thinks if they play it cool for long enough the other party will come around and it'll be a happily ever after.
It never happens though. I haven't seen any FWB turn into a stable relationship. I've just seen the guy get bullied or emotionally blackmailed into being with the girl but then it all goes downhill really fast since he doesn't really want to be with her like that.

217 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 00:24 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>211 It has to be casual/slow burn, just because they so rarely see each other. And there were plenty of times - long stretches - when they could have been together (end of July, all of August), but weren't.

Even if they wanted to throw people off the scent, there are ways to do that while still being together, i.e., vacation to some rather remote place or the opposite: NYC - anyone can get lost in NYC.

218 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-12 00:25 ID:YO42PGlY

>>215 I'm not understanding why. If they are really in a secret boyfriend-girlfriend relationship, why 1) leak it to the press, 2) do pap night, 3) outright deny it, and then 4) be all lovey dovey in public places? I'd even get being caught once by fans, maybe twice, but surely their PR is aware and therefore they are aware too of all the social media sightings. For God's sake the first sneaky fan pic was sold to the Daily Mail! They KNOW people are watching them! If they were really wanting secrecy, wouldn't they be more... secretive?

219 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-12 00:29 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>217 Maybe they were seeing each other during then but got lucky and weren't spotted?

I keep getting the feeling they hangout according to Tom's schedule rather than hers. So if he's busy and can't make time then she doesn't visit.

220 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 00:36 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>218 There are so many possibilities for that article. She wanted to establish their relationship in the public sphere or they both wanted to leak it to get people talking before ISTL (leverage a real relationship). Maybe it wasn't a planned leak, but someone sighted them together and sold the story (maybe someone on the ISTL set?).

Relationship wise, he seems to like to keep his head below the parapet, so I would think that he wanted this relationship introduced via a tabloid. But who knows at this point.

221 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-12 00:56 ID:YO42PGlY

>>220 But none of it makes sense to me, not just the initial article. If I imagine it to be any possible scenario, from just friends all the way up to serious relationship, or even some progression from one to the other, everything that they've said and done seems completely illogical. Which is why I always end up circling back to FWB, because that's what seems to best fit all of the evidence.

222 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 01:56 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>221 If - if - there is one thing we've ALL agreed on, it's that nothing makes complete sense in this situation. But I think that's part of the fun; we get to gossip and speculate as we try to make it make sense!

None of us will ever know the truth until TH publishes his official biography, i.d., the only book EO will ever be eager to read! There will be an entire chapter - or series of chapters - addressing the 'EO Years.'

Chapter Three: She Has More Chemistry with the Gate: Pap Night '15
Chapter Four: We Draw Straws to See Who Gets to Lie at TIFF (Alternate Title: It Was Just Dinner!!)
Chapter Five: 'I Mean We're Definitely Friends' (with Benefits)
Chapter Six: For Fuck's Sake, Jordan: The Laser Tag Scandal

Hell, this relationship might get its own volume in TH's five-part memoirs!

223 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-12 02:07 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>222 LOL that's gold!

>>221 anonsy, a lot of the confusion has to do with the poorly done tabloid leaks and EO's freakout during pap night. If those leaks and pap night was supposed to be their coming out, then someone should get fired because they botched it up. They could've have a great coming out as a couple at TIFF if done right but maybe TH and EO's publicists dropped the ball somewhere.

224 Name: anon1 : 2016-01-12 05:33 ID:s/pIh3Nv

>>192 Thanks Annony

225 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-12 07:01 ID:u1vu1eqv

>>191 Welcome, New Anon!
>>192 Welcome Annony!
Nothing to add to the above except I agree with >>199

226 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 07:03 ID:Heaven

>>221 Quite. There is one other possible scenario but since it seems to me we have more than one troll posting here at this point, it's just easier to wait.

227 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 07:05 ID:Heaven

228 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 07:11 ID:Heaven

he posted on fb about ISTL
https://www.facebook.com/twhiddleston/posts/1017246728319112

this might be the "new seneca" quote.

229 Name: Anon : 2016-01-12 07:43 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>223

That (>>222) is why I love this board and the cool and funny people who post here! If you read back the old boards (not sure how long you've been lurking) there are many more. It's fun to speculate...!

I have read everyone's wise comments and YES to all of it especially >>199 which rings very true on the basis of what we hav seen.

A couple more oddities:

1)US Weekly really did come out of a clear sky which is why I think it came from them/her. There were no pap pics or speculative articles and (as I have said before) no sightings from nw3anon who pretended after US Weekly she had seen them together back in Jan). Whether to establish a timeline, to generate publicity for ISTL (seems a bit early though) or to forcibly introduce herself to he mother of his FWB, who knows.

2) Let's not forget the looooong gap between Pursegategate and TIFF when TH was in London not working and she was in LA not working (and spotted by paps various times). No sign at all that they met up during that period. He doesn't seem to have been up to much - that guardian article, the gq shoot, the Coriolanus commentary - but no contact. This relationship seems to blow hot and cold - or did they take a break after Pursegategate and take it up again in HI? He seems to be blowing hot at the moment - though that coincides with a geographically convenient time with filming in HI and lots of flights via LAX.

3) >>226 Quite.

230 Name: Anon : 2016-01-12 07:47 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>228 And do you remember after Pursegategate he posted on FB about how grateful he was for all his fans?!!!!! He takes to FB to express his love for us all after any social media storm.

231 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 07:51 ID:Heaven

>>230 the limit of 140 character must be a torture for him :)

232 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-12 07:57 ID:YO42PGlY

>>231 I think he used up more than 140 characters just on the HW quotes in that Facebook post.

233 Name: Anon : 2016-01-12 10:13 ID:sddEev2o

Wow. What a story. I'm impressed, perhaps >>192 need to start writing fanfiction or something, sounds so "conviencing".

But may I ask why the simple and pure logic cant stand against the specualtion and gossiping? Maybe because the truth is simple and its boring to talk about it and its far more intreresting to talk about non existing things because you can give your fantasy a go?

At least I can screencap the conversations I had with a person who was extra in SI and lived in Hawaii and not far from the place where Tom was renting his place and show the evidence, but why - why? - the words of >>192 are taken as truth when mine or any other persons who actually uses logic are taken as crap and stupid denial? Maybe because it suits the fantasy of some people? I'm ready to bet that If i wasnt posting anything now this Annony person wouldnt even pop up with their " story".

>>221 Thats right. It is illogical if you put it through "they are together" but if you take it as it is - friends , co workers - then it is logical. Because the photo evidences are actually rather simple - they arent kissing, hugguing and doing all the other things. And you could actually expect it from a photo that I'm sure Tom wasnt expecting to be posted.

>>209 I give a support because yes, there was an interview, if you like I can find it.

And I seriosly have an impression that there are just 5-6 people running all over the web - herem, L-Alley, tumblr and say one and the same things so they seem like a mass. Some dont even bother to change their posts - just copy paste it.

>>231 Couch, I'm noy going to troll anyone. And I'm not trolling anyone. I'm sincerely confused by everything people say.

234 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 11:10 ID:Heaven

>>233 lex, I'm hardly your biggest fan, actually quite the opposite, I honestly can't stand you at all, especially because I know they kind of things you were posting last here on tumblr, so I know the level of your delusion and obsession.
But, for once, I wasn't even referring to you.

That being said, can't you just let go and go back to your twitter? Things are the way they are, which is either they are together in one acronym form or another, or they are not.
You coming here to the rescue, as if we need you to do our thinking, not only doesn't make any difference, but given your reputation it pisses people off to the point where even if you say something sensible they are going to ignore you.

235 Name: N8Anon : 2016-01-12 11:33 ID:p5l+39PD

Morning! I find all of this stuff so confusing!

236 Name: Anon : 2016-01-12 11:35 ID:sddEev2o

>>234 At least you admit things I say have logic, I think I will be happy-ish with that?..

But let me ask you this and I really want a reply - as you can see I'm just sincerely curious, because I try to see what some others see. Sorry in advance for long post - you can delete it later.

I dont see the delusion and obsession. I dont like EO to the point of hate but its not just because of Tom. Things I was saying have a strong back up of evidence from people who actually are or were around Tom, again, as I said, I can show names and screecaps of things they were telling me. What about others? I honestly dont see the reason of gossiping after the clear as a day reply to that siatuation at TIFF. All I remeber that some nearly chocked from happiness after the first article, and went right in denial calling Tom and Lizzie liars when they said they arent dating. Wasnt THAT delusional? Wasnt that crazy? Everybody asked them to say something ( fans I mean), they said something, but some didnt like it because it didnt fit the fantasy or juicy gossip. If the "liars!" thing came after any photo ( like JVR posted) I couldve understand the reaction and words, but right after the denial? So, honestly, to me ( and not only me thanks god, there are people who think the same) people who are trying hard to push it into something more then what has been said by subjects themselves - they seen delusioanl, obsesive and crazy gossipers. Dont forget all of this began from gossip - and it was Toby who first started predicting "the relationship" and pushing it hard. It then went where it went.

I'm not trying to rescue anyone ot snything, I'm still just trying to make others see the other side of the story, because people who think like me are clearly scared to death to come out with teir ideas because they are labeled as crazies, and yes, I mean other posters like Gaga Doll on L-Alley and couple of others who agree with her.

237 Name: Anon : 2016-01-12 11:44 ID:sddEev2o

>>234 just to add to everything I said above: sometimes the easiest explanation is the right one, because you know that truth is always simple. And the easiest explanation is that two grown up people addressed the situation they could ignore ( nobody was poking mics in their faces or chasing them to get an asnwer) and made a statement. We know what kind of statement.

238 Name: anonymous : 2016-01-12 12:43 ID:+meKtgRZ

>>234

Amen.

239 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-12 14:37 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>229 I've been lurking here since thread 4. I did try posting once, made that error where I left the name field blank and ended up with Couch's name lol. Got caught up with work so I couldn't post for a while but I did come and read whenever I got the chance.

I like it here. No one is taking the THEO stuff so seriously and having fun speculating and gossiping and cracking jokes. I don't like the extreme opinions of full blown denial of THEO or the full blown THEO 4eva!

Also, thanks! I'm 199 too and that's my take on THEO so far. I think they perhaps may have wanted to come out (or at least one of them may have) but botched up on the tabloid leaks by using the timeline of "sparks flew on set" because the public thought she was still engaged then and therefore, THEO got a barrage of those homewrecker cheating comments. Then they went underground and their PR did deflection pieces until they decide to come out later with the timeline of "things got serious at TIFF for these two friends of four years" blah blah but then Boyd's interview may have thrown another wrench in their plans so now they're probably just laying low.

Or they don't care. It's no strings attached fun and they hook up whenever Tom is available because the way she flies over to see him whenever he may be, home or working on set, it seems like it's more around his schedule than hers.

240 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 14:50 ID:Heaven

241 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 17:08 ID:Heaven

Well, the collage photo amde it to LaineyGossip
http://www.laineygossip.com/Tom-Hiddleston-promotes-The-Night-Manager-and-likely-still-together-with-Elizabeth-Olsen/42744

does this mean it's probably going to make it to JustJared?

242 Name: Anon : 2016-01-12 17:21 ID:bgcXLLLp

She has got the wrong story. She says "they were together whe the tabloids called it over"; she should be saying "they were [?] together when they had said they weren't." I will laugh at whatever Michael has to say at Dlisted. Don't know about JJ: will he publish given that JVR has taken it down, implying it's a "private" pic not a pre-authorised pic of EO fondling a carrot at her local farmers' market?

243 Name: Annony : 2016-01-12 17:24 ID:s5B9HMwK

@233, what I saw in front of my own eyes was proof enough for me. shrug

I've been reading this board for a while and I just thought I'd say something that's all. The two people I saw looked like a couple, and that was my impression. I don't know exactly where in their attachment they currently are, if they are fwb or bf/gf or even married. They didn't tell me and I don't have a horse in this race.

244 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 17:27 ID:Heaven

>>242 JVR's personal assistant and Olly's BFF didn't take down his regram, since that's the pic Lainey posted it's not private.

245 Name: Anon : 2016-01-12 17:31 ID:sddEev2o

>>243 yeah yeah sure.

246 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 18:12 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>223 'Dropped the ball' - Okay, so there are two things we can ALL agree on.

Dropped the ball - you think! They dropped the ball, it caught on fire, then exploded (like a Christmas hoverboard). They've put out the fire and - I think - are trying to clumsily glue together the charred pieces. That should work out just fine.

Meanwhile, Luke is buying stock in Just for Men hair dye and Pepto Bismol.

247 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 18:33 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>235 Yeah, N8Anon, we need some sort of THEO gossip/speculation/theory flowchart. I need the same when watching Game of Thrones: 'Who's that? What's his name? Is he good or bad? Where the hell are they?'

TH's love life is like Game of Thrones, but with fewer dragons.

248 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 18:39 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>242 Lainey's 'missing the point' story is strange, because SHE herself interviewed both at TIFF and commented on the 'alleged relationship.' She referenced the article we're all referencing (I don't think she herself asked them) and said that while she didn't believe their denial, they had stayed away from each other at TIFF.

249 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-12 18:39 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>240 damn he looks delicious there! Also that shirt...it definitely has one foot in the grave, that's for sure. Seen better days!

>>246 LOL! It's not THAT bad. It's just dating. But maybe work out a PR strategy that isn't a throwback to the 1980s? How about that THEO? Also EO probably forgot that even tho she dumped Boyd in Oct and started romancing TH then, the general public all thought the engagement was called off around Dec since the announcement was made in Jan. Let's see what new timeline they'll feed us if they come out as a couple.

250 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-12 18:44 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>248 Lainey's probably over it too if she didn't believe their TIFF denials.

251 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 18:46 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>243 Thanks for your story, Annony. As you can see, some people can't/won't be convinced. Nothing you can do about it.

Stick around and post away!

252 Name: N8Anon : 2016-01-12 18:51 ID:p5l+39PD

>>247 Damn right we do! I mean, I'm an educated woman, but the various stories / non stories / false moves and fabrications make it impossible to understand. Maybe that is part of the subterfuge though, just to bamboozle us and they can carry on with whatever whilst people get their knickers in a twist trying to decipher it all.
Anyway, who cares, in the grand scheme of things. Good luck to them, whatever is going on!

253 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 18:53 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>250 I would agree. I don't read her often, but those pieces I have read suggest that she's got a fairly good nose for bullshit. She not anymore surprised than we are.

Also, she's very savvy regarding status. She speaks about certain people - TH, BC, even MF - as being 'internet famous' and nothing more. And she doesn't seem to sweat over the 'internet famous' stories like those about 'real' celebs.

254 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 18:57 ID:3MF+ks8/

Tweet until Torrilla.

https://twitter. com/portalbritish/status/686959726060503040

255 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 19:00 ID:Heaven

>>253 The point really is that laineygossip is a well known website, the woman even published a book.
So now other media will be aware of it, as well as the paps.
It basically nullify what they happened at TIFF, maybe the reason behind TH's post, since that facebook page was created in September.

256 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 19:00 ID:3MF+ks8/

There's a small group of tweets calling for TH to play Bowie in a biopic.

Maybe EO could play Iman.

257 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 19:00 ID:Heaven

>>254 it's already there :)

258 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 19:06 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>257 She is otherworldly!! So good.

FYI: The Lainey article isn't really being picked up on twitter. I've only seen it retweeted/linked a few times.

259 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 19:19 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>249 It's probably not that bad - it's NOT hoverboard bad.

On the subject of timeline: If they do go public, I wonder if the Nashville premiere is going to be 'ground zero' for a public relationship. They were terribly cozy - yes, that word - on the red carpet. Those pics would do better service than TIFF and Pap Night combined.

260 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-12 20:04 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>259 I'm sensing some latent hostility towards hoverboards. Bad experience with those infernal devices? lol

Yeah the Nashville premiere might end up being the new "sparks flew on the red carpet and everyone witnesses their sizzling chemistry and how cozy the two looked with one another" and they'll use that pic of the two of them where she's laughing so hard it looks like she can't breathe. I'm thinking end of Feb early March for the PR breadcrumb trail to start and then an unveiling of sorts at the April premiere.

261 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-12 20:14 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>260

I LOVE my hoverboard - yes, I asked Santa for a hoverboard (which is totally not a 'hoverboard' in the BTTF sense, but is still a lot of fun). But I'm side-eyeing it hard because the moment my ass falls off and needs to go to the ER or it sets our apartment on fire - it's over. Love affair DONE.

What do we think TH got EO for Christmas? Airplane ticket to Oz? Condoms? Purse?

262 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-12 20:22 ID:YO42PGlY

>>261 Good question! Definitely not books, since she doesn't like reading. I'm gonna go with a purse large enough to cover the entire top half of her body the next time they're "accidentally" at a paparazzi hotspot together. The real question is why fashion-conscious EO didn't buy her BF some new clothes for Christmas - he's still wearing the same three shirts. Surely that must bother her. Though if their relationship is what I suspect it is, she probably doesn't care much about whether or not he's even wearing a shirt.

263 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-12 21:02 ID:Heaven

http://nationalfilmawards.co.uk/nominations-for-the-national-film-awards-2016-revealed/

Nominations for the National Film Awards 2016 Revealed

"This year’s 2nd annual National Film Awards 2016 for the UK takes place in London, on the 31st of March 2016"

Best Actor
Tom Courtenay (45 Years)
Colin Farrell (The Lobster)
Michael Fassbender (Macbeth)
Colin Firth ( Kingsman – The Secret Service)
Tom Hardy (Legend)
Tom Hiddleston (High-Rise)

264 Name: Anon : 2016-01-12 23:20 ID:bgcXLLLp

Weirdly the kermit Instagram guy flipped the pic of himself and TH. The Coriolanus scar is on the wrong side. Here is our hero the right way around: http://cheers-mrhiddleston.tumblr.com/post/137182097737/larygo-got-to-make-lunch-for-the-awesome-tom

265 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-13 02:19 ID:YO42PGlY

>>242 Also, even if we do consider the the tabloid relationship timeline, the "THEO is over" stories didn't come out until after that photo was taken. So technically the tabloid stories about the breakup could still be accurate.

266 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-13 05:42 ID:u1vu1eqv

FWB relationships can blow hot and cold - that's the nature of an open-ended arrangement that runs around each other's schedules (personal experience with 3 different time of my l). The difference with them seems to be that she has not been busy since Captain America : Civil War finished filming, so she has more flexibility. So I completely believe that she was in Pasadena and they kept it all on the down low so as not to repeat PurseGate Gate, especially after the collage picture from JV-R. I think there is enough of a friendship there that, once he's finished filming SI and IW and comes home to London to do Richard II (or III? I forget) and maybe Robert the Bruce, will have the chance to gel into a real romance, or find that it's not strong enough.

Either that, or I'm wrong! Hey, 50/50 odds ain't bad...

>>261 I'll go with a first class ticket to Oz and a new phone with global calling capability for 24/7 sexting (he bought himself one too so they can have private numbers that neither family, friends, or work know about).

267 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-13 05:43 ID:u1vu1eqv

*(personal experience with 3 different men during different times in my life)

268 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-13 05:53 ID:YO42PGlY

Okay I've been sitting on this since the original post but... Who the hell gets out of an SUV at a gas station to publicly make out with someone they're trying to hide? Who makes out at a gas station in the first place? Why would Tom and Lizzie both be getting out of the car? Were they pumping gas together? Why them instead of the driver? I just don't think that story makes sense.

Do I think there was something going on between them? Probably. Is it still going on? Maybe. But I don't buy the gas station story for one minute.

269 Name: Annony : 2016-01-13 06:32 ID:s5B9HMwK

@268

That's fine but to clear up a few points: I never said anything about Tom pumping gas for the car, it was the driver who did that. And they weren't "making out", a kiss and a hug (he kissed her on the forehead and they hugged, maybe I should have been more detailed about what I saw but honestly it wasn't that big of a deal) and as for reasons why the got out of the car. Who knows, people do get out of cars at gas stations, maybe he had to go pee, maybe he had to stretch his legs? Should I have gone over and asked him? 7 in the am, half assed asleep on my way to work, asking some movie star why he got out of his car. No, don't think so.

I don't like people putting words in my mouth, if you don't believe me that's fine but don't add your own narrative to it.

270 Name: Annony : 2016-01-13 06:38 ID:s5B9HMwK

Future note to anyone else that happens to see THEO, keep it to yourself.

Lesson learned. Been called a liar, a troll and had words put into my mouth. Lovely.

Annony out...

271 Name: qaz : 2016-01-13 06:40 ID:wxE9Uiiq

>>268 I think it goes without saying that like everything on the internet, this story should also be taken with a quite a grain of salt, but... maybe he's not trying to hide her so much? We have a pic with his arm around her in his own native neighbourhood, the PursaGate (in spite of weird facial expressions and purse/scarf antics, they still were in a popular pap-favourite restaurant), now a collage with friends/colleagues. Whatever is going on there, does not seem that he's avoiding to be seen with her in the open at all costs.
As for getting out of the car, maybe they wanted to stretch their legs or smth, lol.

That being said, a pic would be the best proof, that's for sure.

272 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-13 06:43 ID:YO42PGlY

>>269 I wasn't putting words in your mouth. I was asking some questions about parts of the story that I found odd and pointing out elements that didn't make sense to me.

273 Name: qaz : 2016-01-13 06:48 ID:wxE9Uiiq

>>270 Don't be out, Annony! It's just natural that when you tell something on the internet without hard proof, some will believe you, some not, and people will express their opinions. I don't think anyone has anything against you personally here!
Well, at least I don't.

274 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-13 07:15 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>269 don't get offended! But it's natural that when anyone shares a sighting of a celeb, ppl are gonna wanna know details. The details you've shared now give a whole new perspective on the THEO situation than just saying you saw them hug and kiss at the gas station.

For what it's worth, many here thanked you for sharing what you saw. We didn't question you so please don't get offended and leave. People will always ask questions but I think it's safe to say that on this board, it's more out of curiosity than trying to call someone a troll or liar.

275 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-13 07:16 ID:Heaven

>>268 thank you, I didn't want to be the one calling bs, and actually that's not even the weirdest part.
AMC would have put its guest in one hotel and organised transportation to the TCA panel in Pasadena for them to arrive at the same moment. Am I supposed to believe they provided cars without a full tank? Am I supposed to think that TH got to Pasadena and told EO to get lost until he did his thing? Am I supposed to think that all the other actors headed to Pasadena but TH dallied at a gas station? Of course now it will come out that it wasn't on tha TCA day, so why TH would be headed to Pasadena? But even if he rented a car why would the car need gas? Rentals always come with full tank. It's even more absurd then the NYE sighting.

276 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-13 07:44 ID:Heaven

and the shit keeps on going
https://www.instagram.com/p/BAZXIcsgDcg/

note how these 2 mentioned the dailymail. Someone has a grudge with TH.

277 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-13 07:54 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>276 ugh it just keeps getting worse and worise on JVR's IG. I wonder if he's showing Tom all those comments and going "bruh wtf" or maybe since they're in Australia he'd probably say "wtf mate"

278 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-13 07:55 ID:Heaven

>>277 I wonder of JVR will do like Abrahams and say how TH wasn't too happy of media claiming he was in a relationship with EO and then we'll see JVR walking holding hands and walking arm in arm with EO.

279 Name: Anon : 2016-01-13 08:06 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>276 I don't get the reaction to these pics! That is obviously Brie and the person behind her isn't EO (is it?!!).

I see the other Instagram guy from yesterday has deleted his pic. Poor guy. What on earth have people said to make him remove a nice, innocuous fan pic? It's mad out there in "Tom social media world" ATM.

280 Name: qaz : 2016-01-13 08:09 ID:wxE9Uiiq

>>279 I was wondering the same. Is it EO?? If it is, she seems REALLY not like herself from this angle :)

281 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-13 08:11 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>278 LOL! Maybe if we're lucky we'll get another disastrous pap walk before that!
Bets on EO actually walking into a pole this time while wailing and hiding behind her old lady scarf/ bag?

282 Name: Anon : 2016-01-13 08:12 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>280 The nose is totally wrong. EO has a much smaller nose. And the person looks like they have short hair under their hat - or it must be pulled back super tight.

283 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-13 08:14 ID:SKuCBz5r

Tbh, that person behind Brie looks more like Boyd lol seriously when I first saw it I thought it was Boyd for a split second.

284 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-13 08:19 ID:YO42PGlY

>>283 What a plot twist THAT would be! No it's definitely not EO behind Brie, or anywhere else in that pic. Maybe those posters thought Brie was EO?

285 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-13 08:19 ID:Heaven

the person behind is definitely a guy, no woman would ever wear that beret. I think those posters just wanted to go on about EO to cuase some reaction from TH, that's probably why they mentioned the dailymail.

286 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-13 15:48 ID:Heaven

So CB did her post about the collage photo using the fact that EO attended Stella McCartney’s Fashion Party Last Night. And insinuating the pregnancy.



287 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-13 15:55 ID:Heaven

btw, she is not pregnant, if she were she'd be in OZ with him.

288 Name: Anon : 2016-01-13 16:11 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>286 Totally confused as usual. She thinks this was a recent photo because she does not have anonsy to compare the laser tag pics and tell us it was from then! So she is spinning this idea that they have spent the whole of the holiday season together.

EO does look lovely - but I don't think this is a pregnancy glow, I think it is a no goth makeup and not wearing black glow.

289 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-13 16:16 ID:Heaven

>>288 it's a gossip site so it lives on clicks, at least she made an effort to put the question mark - where she says if this was before of after the Star article.

And no purse or scarf! :)

290 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-13 18:27 ID:n4MyjMhe

>>270

Annony, please be aware that the Anon with the ID ending in 'sddEev2o' does NOT represent this board or its regulars. She's the one who called you a troll and accused you of lying. She's very much over-invested in TH and his love life. Insults from her need to be ignored.

Anonsy - as she said - was just looking for clarification and expressing doubt about some parts of the story. Totally normal messageboard stuff.

I for one believe your story - and I don't even think you're Luke!!

But you may be Olsen...side-eye...just kidding!

291 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-13 18:29 ID:u1vu1eqv

>>286 Much better than the goth look she pulled at TIFF, was it?

I'm sure someone will say she's trolling fans by wearing that dress.

292 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-13 18:40 ID:u1vu1eqv

As for JVR's instagram, that last comment by prufrock1 sounds exactly like - word for word - one of the anons that posts the same crap to teatime, wtf, and the byke trying to rile everyone up.

293 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-13 18:41 ID:n4MyjMhe

>>275 Well, if he stayed with her Thursday night, then they might have sent a car to pick him (and her if she was tagging along) and bring him to event at the hotel. They would have booked him into the hotel, but that doesn't mean he needed to stay there - he might have crashed with a friend ;). Then, she waits in the hotel room for him to finish with the press events and they get to have a nice good-bye before he leaves.

All speculation, but honestly there are so many scenarios that could work.

I'm not completely sure of the timing, however. I don't recall when those pics of him arriving at LAX were - Thursday? Friday? Or when he left after the TCA event.

294 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-13 18:46 ID:n4MyjMhe

>>276 Christ, Christ, Christ. Baby Jesus save this man from crazy-ass fans.

Let's all of us - the sane ones on the board - swear a solemn oath to NEVER become those people. NEVER.

And, personally, if any of you ever sense that I'm heading in that direction, I want you all to organize some type of intervention. We arrange to be on the board at the same time and you get me to 1. admit that I have a problem and 2. that I need to see professional help.

Promise me, make the promise!!

295 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-13 18:49 ID:n4MyjMhe

>>278 HA! Just like we had the 'new Seneca' on Facebook, we'll get the 'new Marc Abraham.'

296 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-13 19:00 ID:n4MyjMhe

>>287 If she were pregnant, they'd be at the registry office! We'd have had an official announcement and maybe even a tweet about Mama Hiddles buying a hat for the big day.

And, I don't think he would have look so relaxed at the TCA event. That boy would have been shitting a brick.

297 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-13 19:08 ID:u1vu1eqv

>>276 I've wondered the same. What skeletons has he got rattling, or does someone hate his PR, or what... Is it because he's of peerage - a class war?

298 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-13 19:15 ID:n4MyjMhe

>>292 It probably is the same person. The TH corner of fandom is so small and insignificant. There's really only a small handful - what? 10, maybe fewer - of sites that feature him on a regular basis and in a significant way. So when fan want to scream something from the top of their lungs, they just cut and paste at the same handful of sites.

299 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-13 20:01 ID:Heaven

http://www.standard.co.uk/goingout/film/evening-standard-british-film-awards-the-contenders-a3155496.html

Evening Standard British Film Awards - the contenders

BEST FILM
Brooklyn
45 Years
High-Rise
The Lobster

300 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-13 21:41 ID:5qEt5bUn

https://twitter. com/Cris_Kozlovsky/status/687383652435660801

This tweet is a snap of a Rolling Stone article saying HR will be out May 13 in the US.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.