[Contentless] ITT you post right now [ASAP] your current thought.[Brains] [Thinking] [Personal] [#7] (999)

1 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6868 12:41

I preferred the thread title as it was in Part 5 over the shorter version in Part 6, and so I decided to copy the style of the former. May this THREAD Restoration usher in a new era of peace, prosperity, progress and posts about current thoughts for /dqn/!

101 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 09:36

http://i.imgur.com/roTz3.jpg
Somebody made the whole Geeks vs. Nerds issue even worse.

102 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 09:40

103 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 09:58

I'm downloading a rom for a 101 Dalmations game for the Gameboy Color. I've lost control of my life

104 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 10:59

>>101
I still can't tell which one I am

105 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 11:14

>>101
I strongly disagree with many parts of the image, mostly though the claim that true geeks use a mac while nerds use PCs. I also noted the lack of any label describing nerd fashion choices, to contrast the geeks' "ironic t-shirts". Instead the nerd is merely depicted in the same exaggerated costume that has been a part of American pop culture since the mid-20th century. The idea that only nerds are interested in sci-fi also clashes with my beliefs.
I guess my strong feelings about the issue confirm Munroe's assertion that I must be one or the other, if not both.

106 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 11:17

I wonder whether getting pandas to breed is more or less of a challenge than trying the same with D&D players.

107 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 11:38

I read a scary story and now I feel frozen...

108 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 12:02

I want to poop. But I do't want to get away from my desktop.

109 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 12:03

>>108
don't*

110 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 12:54

>>101 hehe except for the will ferrel part, and I wear more band t-shirts than ironic t-shirts, all the geek stereotypes fit me. I'm a little miffed at "techno music" when they probably don't actually mean techno and just mean anything bleepy.

111 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 13:13

I hope my cat is all right.

112 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 13:15

>>106
Less, as male pandas do not outnumber female pandas by several hundred to one.

113 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 13:31

I CAN DO ANYTHING!

114 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 14:23

OBVSLY, >>113 is the Lizard King.

115 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 14:54

I hope >>111's cat is all right.

116 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 14:59

I hope >>111 can afford to pay the vet if >>111's cat turns out not to be all right.

117 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 15:17

>>97
>>98
Again, complain to the - crowd. They are using an accessible ASCII character as a Unicode substitute. Same with people who use full stops for ellipses, or ' for an apostrophe, or / for fractions.

And my problem with Shift_JIS is that this is what DQN encodes its pages as: not UTF-8. A nice side effect is that I have Japanese text set up to display in Mona, so DQN is all pretty.

Your problem is WakabaMark.

118 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 16:00

>>117
Your problem is that accessible ASCII substitute is a typewriter quotation mark (" \ http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/0022/index.htm). And no one, I repeat, no one prevents you from using proper unicode quotation marks if you want to. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark#Typing_quotation_marks_on_a_computer_keyboard look, this is easy as hell. And these quotation marks look beautiful unlike double grave accents and apostrophes which look shit followed by a simple ".

119 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 16:06

@@‚Φ-Ν
@ Π*L°MЁ@@I am >>111's cat, nya~ Everything's cool, nya~
`(,_‚•‚•Ι

120 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 17:12

I don't understand any of this text formatting stuff...

121 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 17:28

>>120
Learn LaTeX and all will be well. even my captcha for this post is tex, so you can tell the board agrees with me.

122 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 18:46

Let's just go with the duck.

123 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 20:40

>>120
LaTeX makes people go all wonky and stuff! Just look at this guy who clings to his apostrophes, even though it's only in TeX they look pretty. And this website is hardly TeX!

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/quotes.html

I mean, there is time and place for everything. But, please, stick to the common or proper typography in places where other people can see your text.

124 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 21:03

I don't believe I've ever carried out mathematical induction with more than one value to the power of n. This is considerably frustrating.

125 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6872 21:42

>>123
This gets linked way too often. ` was described as a left quotation mark (and ' as a right one) in ASCII. The original ASCII. That is, the American Standard Code for Information Interchange. He puts way too much emphasis on X, which came, what, two decades later?

There are a few other problems in the article too, notably that he's guilty of the exact same things he's complaining about (using ASCII symbols instead of their more specific Unicode equivalents). I actually emailed him about all this a year or two ago, but he never replied.

126 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 05:01

>>125
Yeah, original ASCII, 20 years prior to X. When was that? Why do you still use it? You are missing the point anyway. ` and ' look terrible as quotation marks.

And, nope, he uses gh. So you're kinda wrong on both points.

127 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 05:14

My boyfriend is quitting LoL because of me and I feel really bad about it

128 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 05:39

I love how >>123 shows a photo of a German keyboard and then goes on to ignore the fact that the German left quotation mark (U+201E) is put at the bottom of the line, „like thish.

129 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 05:41

>>128 again. My bad, that should have been „like thisg.

130 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 08:30

>>125

> The original ASCII.

Did not define . That came in the 60s (so did lowercase letters). as left quotation mark in ASCII was a short-lived, single-nation mistake, coming in standards that are now way the hell superceded.

131 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 08:33

>>130
also, haha i forgot wakabamark processes backticks

132 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 09:22

>>131
A convenient feature I had not yet heard about. So that's how you get monospace text inside a paragraph! And here I was afraid I'd have to resort to ‚†‚•‚Œ‚Œ|‚—‚‰‚„‚”‚ˆ@‚‚Œ‚‚ˆ‚‚Ž‚•‚‚…‚’‚‰‚ƒ for that sort of thing.

133 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 10:26

Geordies and mackems and why they all hate each other so much.

134 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 10:54

I wrote up a post explaining the differences between 4-ch and 4chan to a Japanese speaker on /nihongo/. Would any dokyuns who can read Japanese care to give me constructive criticism?

135 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 15:02

Thumb tastes like milk.

136 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 16:53

I'm thinking about thinking. So deep!

137 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 16:54

>>133
I'm a Mackem and I don't hate Geordies.

But maybe that's because I don't follow football.

138 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 18:10

>>136
I do that all the time and get nowhere.

139 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 18:20

What have they done to deserve such a sight? NOTHING.

140 Name: grey!C.MxxuCiTo : 1993-09-6873 20:00

I went to a beach. http://i.imgur.com/0cfGO.jpg

141 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 20:13

>>140
That is some pretty damned mediocre handwriting, if you don't mind me saying so.

142 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 21:58

>>141
Although my handwriting isn't much better when I try, this sample seems really half assed. You're talking to your only true friends here, grey. Put at least an hour into it. Nice beach though.

143 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 22:54

The cat I'm taking care of for someone hates me. I put her food and water out and clean her litter box, she hides under the bed for whatever fucking reason she does that for, and we generally try to avoid each other. Any time I get near her she hisses at me, and I tell her to go fuck herself (too bad she can't understand what I'm saying.)

It really seems like this is a trial run for married life.

144 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 22:57

>>143

D: Maybe she's just high-strung and afraid of strangers. My cat is like that. With me she's very affectionate, but she has never really accepted anyone else. When I've gone on vacation and asked friends to board her, they tell me afterwards that she hid in the closet the whole time, miaouing mournfully, and I have to go into that closet, detach her claws from the carpet, and stuff her in the pet carrier to get her home.

145 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 23:26

>>144
That's probably it.

I'm just sick of dealing with an animal that either is afraid of or hates me all the time. I like animals fine, but my idea is that they can do their own thing and I don't need to know about it. In any case her owner will be back soon, which should make things less stressful for both of us.

146 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 23:39

My Twitter icon is a picture of a Slowpoke now

147 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 23:40

>>143

Why do people talk down on marriage like it is literally hell? You do realize marriage is a choice right? And that it is okay to wait many years before realizing that you really want to live with someone?

148 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 23:41

>>143 You can't marry a cat you SICKO!

149 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6873 23:45

>>147 I'm always hoping for the best and preparing for the worst.

Also, marriage isn't a choice for me. I'm an only child from a traditional family. If I take too long some of my relatives will try to find someone for me and force me into it.

150 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 01:40

>>143-144
In general, cats do not like being left in another place with (what are to them) strangers; it's like a nightmare where their home and loving family have been taken from them--one of them is bad enough, both is just-fucking-kill-me-already territory. You can get such cats to accept their new (temporary) reality with some psychological bullshit, but it takes time.

151 Name: orzclones!w69hSItc/I : 1993-09-6874 01:43

You know what the internet needs more of these days? Drama.

152 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 02:39

>>151 Honey i'm pregnant and it's not yours

153 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 03:24

>>151
I think so, too. Drama is the most entertaining thing web communities can have. I love stirring the pot.

154 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 05:28

>>152
You bitch! How dare you address that guy as Honey! I thought I was special! (exit stage left, sobbing and running like a girl)

155 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 05:39

>>151 I'll call up TNT. They know drama, apparently.

156 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 06:03

So I ordered this Japanese book published in 1939 the other daym but when it arrived, the pages and cover looked so yellowed that I thought they must have sent me a book from 1912 by mistake. It seems to be the correct book, though, and the publisher information states Shōwa 14 as the year it came out. Think I could still get a partial refund out of this?

157 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 06:05

Fat girls always wear sunglasses and have a frozen coffee drink in their hand. This one fat gay guy I knew, too.

Do gays find the notion of "as long as they act straight" offensive? Because it's exactly how I feel. If sexual preference is that tied to flamboyance in attitude, then I am truly homophobic and hate all gay people.

158 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 06:34

>>156 it's just yellowed paper, right? Unless it was advertised in some other condition or extraordinarily expensive or some other unusual circumstance, I wouldn't bother. books is books.

159 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 07:40

>>158
Well, that and the paper covering the spine of the paperback has largely flaked off.@I did pay only 1050 yen (plus shipping), and the description pointed out that the book showed "the usual signs of age", also the printing inside hasn't faded noticeably, so I guess I could let it go.

160 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 10:44

It's 2012. There is no excuse to be a homophobe.

161 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 11:21

It's 2012. There is no excuse to be a homosexual.

162 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 11:39

It's 2012. There is no excuse to be making arguments based solely on chronology.

163 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 11:44

It's 1993. You three are idiots.

164 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 11:45

> 1993
> People say that it's 2012.

165 Name: !ESpeoN/nPA : 1993-09-6874 11:54

Do you think aliens would have a hard time learning how to operate human-build machinery?

166 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 12:25

>>165 I had a hard time learning how to operate your mum.

titter titter chuckle

167 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 12:34

>>166
<a href=http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1340449343/>Posting in the wrong thread</a>? I know that feel, bro.

168 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 12:50

>>167
Forgetting to set the right formatting before hitting Reply? Can't say I know that one.

169 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 15:22

Fucking Minecraft server, why aren't you online? Don't you know I have time to be wasting‽

170 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 16:05

Turns out "woman" comes from the Old English word "wifman" (female human; male human was "werman") and does not mean "of man". Similar deal with "male" and "female".

My crazy feminist English language teacher lied to me!

171 Name: !ESpeoN/nPA : 1993-09-6874 16:05

>>166
I'm not a robot, I'm a little living boy.

172 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 16:26

>>171
[ Lɯ`] BUZZ CLICK

173 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 18:15

I need to stop getting involved with younger people. They're cute but so juvenile and clingy.

174 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 18:52

>>173
Same.

...

Heh.

175 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 21:00

Good night, DQN.

176 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 21:05

>>173>>174 i hope i never come to this realisation...

177 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 22:01

>>173
"Clingy" is the most stupid word in the world ever.

I want to go back to the old days where people would marry within months. Even if most people would (and probably did) end up miserable.

178 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 22:57

>>177
Well, most young girls don't get highly attached for any good reason at all. They want some fairy tale idea of love that doesn't mean anything but compassion without basis, a reciprocal closeness bound only by how "close" you appear to be. Also I think these "old days" you are talking about were when arranged marriages were predominant.

179 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 23:12

>>177
No, clingy is a very descriptive and useful word. It describes well the sort of person who won't allow her boyfriend a single day alone, who leaves him text messages when he's at work and wants always to know where he is and what he's doing and to likewise share her own location and doings. The sort who thinks if a couple spends a week apart, they're in a bad relationship.

Some guys like this, I'm sure. One man's "clingy" is another man's "dedicated", after all.

180 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 23:26

>>177

"Clingy" works when the person just doesn't know how to relinquish their feelings for you.

181 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6874 23:48

>>179

> Some guys like this, I'm sure. One man's "clingy" is another man's "dedicated", after all.

I was about to say: I would quite like this.

I can understand how people would find it annoying, but even though I like my personal space I would really enjoy having someone cling to me 24/7. As long as they don't go full-on yandere, of course.

182 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 00:14

I try to subtly split imperatives whenever I can.

183 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 00:24

It would be good if my girl was slightly more yandere

184 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 01:57

>>181
Well, for me it maybe depends on the sort of girl. I would have to really be crazy about her in the same way she is about me for it to work. Otherwise it just would get tedious and grating.

185 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 03:48

i love clingy girls

186 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 04:28

I'm very clingy, I wish my man was more clingy
Nothing turns me on more than two people who are obsessed with each other

187 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 04:58

>>186
You sound like you would enjoy Chikamatsu's bunraku plays.

188 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 05:29

>>186
Specifically, this one.

189 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 05:36

>>186
I know how you mean. The last person I was with was really avoidant, it was the worst ;_;

190 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 05:37

>>187
Speaking of which, bunraku puppets creep me the fuck out. The first time after I had to watch a performance in class, I had recurring nightmares for the better part of a week.

191 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 07:58

Somehow, I'm reminded of Shiraki Aeka.

192 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 10:40

>>186
>>189
Really, if you push him further with clingyness, more often than not he'll end up running away. Well, I can't speak for most men. But some of us are just like that. Give us some goddamn breathing room, please.

Clingy girls drive me out of my mind (in the bad way.) Unless I find the sort of girl I can obsess over, that unlikely one in 100,000+, I just want someone who's as independent as I am. But again, I can only speak for myself.

Sorry for being all serious, but this brought up some nasty memories for me.

193 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 11:33

Posting on DQN is way slow compared to other boards.

Optimize your scripts, WAHa.06x36!

194 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 12:27

Something.

195 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 14:30

Just saw the porn title "Son's friend to watch pro wrestling,Mother VS Younger Brother's friend-in-law"

What the hell is a friend-in-law?

196 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 16:01

I'm hungry.

197 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 16:29

>>196
As am I.

198 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 16:37

Clingyness is the worst when, even after you leave and say go away & stop stalking to me, they follow you around.

199 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 16:48

>>195
Your wife's friends who you kind of hang out with but really don't want to.

200 Name: ( ˃ ヮ˂) : 1993-09-6875 17:24

>>195
I know some people have little sister fetishes, but is there really a market for... what is it, "Younger Brother's Friend-in-law" fetish porn?

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.