Tom Hiddleston 6 (1000)

1 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-08 09:53 ID:Heaven

101 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-09 20:05 ID:8c72Ic/o

>>96 He wouldn't! But do we think it's just that (no strings attached rumpy-bumpy), or, more importantly, does TH think it's just that.

She seems invested - even to us - so wouldn't she appear the same to TH? If he didn't want that (sex with investment), I think he'd tap the breaks, so to speak. Or stop the Jag and tell her to get out, as he seems to have done with Ave JArthy!

The next few weeks/months are going to be soooo juicy: birthdays, filming in exotic, far off destinations, press junkets, maybe joint filming on Infinity Wars - so many opportunities to gauge this relationship!!

102 Name: Anon : 2016-01-09 20:13 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>101 Who knows how it appears to him. I would say that various limpets of my acquaintance are quite good at hiding their yearning, because everyone knows that the ticking of the biological clock is not an appealing sound to the average limpet-ee. And I think men are quite adept generally speaking at closing their eyes to limpeting if they are enjoying the sex and the fun. Since they don't even live on the same continent it must be quite easy to maintain distance.

103 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-09 20:15 ID:u1vu1eqv

>>100 Possibly, but not probably? Maybe she was hoping for something to happen in tropical paradise that didn't, and then the picture debacle - hey, that one was taken down too - and that seemed the end of things. The thought of her deciding she was too humiliated by that incident to continue the relationship makes sense for other women but...I dunno, does the Blessed Ave JA have a limit to her martyrdom?

104 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-09 20:17 ID:YO42PGlY

>>101 I don't know, it's always easier to judge these things from an outside perspective. We can all tell how invested she seems, but maybe in private she's saying all the right things to keep him around? (This is assuming that nothing has changed since November and they are together, which I'm having doubts about.) And, if he has a hard time saying no to strangers, it might be even harder for him when it's a friend or loved one.

105 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-09 20:18 ID:u1vu1eqv

106 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-09 20:19 ID:8c72Ic/o

>>95 >>99

I think TH having nothing is far less worrying than EO having nothing simply because she hasn't had anything significant for awhile. Apparently her part in CA:CW is blink and you'll miss it. Even her part in ISTL, while important, is on the smaller side. And as people here have said: she's got to make hay while the sun is shining (before 30 in Hollywood!)

107 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-09 20:25 ID:8c72Ic/o

>>103 Martyrdom!! I love it. As you all know, she's a saint in my eyes. Think about it:

Things attributed to saints:

  1. Visions/Sightings - Tick- She's always being seen at G&W and any brunette with highlights is automatically JArthy.
  2. Miracles - Tick - She engineered a Bora Bora vacy out of a - seemingly - FWB - relationship.
  3. Healings - Tick - okay, that one's not really a tick, but just wait, just wait.

108 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-09 20:41 ID:u1vu1eqv

>>99 - EO has nothing more on IMDBPro than what's showing on IMDB, and she's ranked #95. By contrast, Tom Hardy, for example, has 8 listings in Pro - unlabeled or labeled 'script,' 'optioned,' or 'pitch.' He's listed as the #5 actor in the world on IDMB this week.

109 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-09 20:43 ID:u1vu1eqv

>>107 Healings - she healed TH's sex yearnings, apparently. (Too thin? Sorry.)

110 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-09 20:49 ID:Heaven

Guys guys, let me remind you of limpet #1: Sian, 1 year attached to his tailcoats and just a friend.

111 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-09 21:03 ID:u1vu1eqv

And she managed to break away without an embarrassing photo-deleting episode and tumblr crash. (That was before my time - am I missing something?)

112 Name: Anon : 2016-01-09 21:08 ID:bgcXLLLp

Anyone remember Sex and the City? And the toxic bachelors? And Big's apartment which was like Teflon for women because nothing left by a woman ever stuck there?

113 Name: Anon : 2016-01-09 21:14 ID:bgcXLLLp

Anyway, if you do, I think this is TH in a nutshell: rich, powerful, handsome attentive, charming, always got a woman on the go, not unwilling to see her and hang out, but is allergic to the word GF and never introduces her to his mother. It seems to have been his pattern since he broke up with SF.

Now watch him as he brings EO to the GGs - specifically to spite me!

114 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-09 21:21 ID:Heaven

>>111 she didn't have photo-deleting episodes, but she attended numerous (more than JA and EO combined) public events with him (google her on google images you'll see). I bring her up because everyone here is Jarthy! :)

115 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-09 21:21 ID:Heaven

>>105 how come that all of his character are always vulnerable?

116 Name: Anon : 2016-01-09 21:56 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>114 She got stuck in the friend zone (in my interpretation, though this was before I joined the fandom). I always assumed he ran away when she made her feelings known as they were such good mates and then - boom! - she disappeared.

117 Name: Anon : 2016-01-09 22:03 ID:bgcXLLLp

We worship the Blessed JArthy because she touched the Holy Conda of Hiddleston and she let us all know she had, oh yes. None of this "people can think what they like" crap. When did the Pope last say that about a miracle, eh?

118 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-09 22:06 ID:u1vu1eqv

>>111 >>112 I do, I do - I think whatever happened with SF (which NW3 was supposed to reveal but never did) made him a confirmed bachelor for the foreseeable future.

119 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-09 22:07 ID:u1vu1eqv

OMG, my captcha is 'peaner' It's making fun of me.

120 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-09 22:12 ID:SKuCBz5r

I think she got friend zoned hard. From what I gathered from her tweets, she went to the Avengers after party in LA with him and they even went on some vacation together where they shared cocktails on the beach together. Then after attending a bunch of events with him and retweeting and following everything of his, she got some hate from fangirls but she braved it. However after his UNICEF trip, she simply disappeared for a year.

I think he may have been taking her to events to help her network like he did with his other friend John McMillan ( the guy from that Friend Request Pending movie) but she may have thought there was room for something more. When it didn't pan out after he got back from UNICEF, she left Twitter and only came back after a year.
What is with Tom and these girls? After SF, he certainly seems to have a history of these kind of "friends but may more?"

121 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-09 23:11 ID:u1vu1eqv

They were openly affectionate in public, real bf/gf-like until a paper reported them as married, from what I've read in archives. A few embarrassing questions from the press, and they were over, along with an FB comment of Thank God from her friend.

122 Name: Anon : 2016-01-09 23:15 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>121 A friend of mine, a journalist, swore he was married. She is pretty savvy about this stuff as it is her job, so the rumours must have been pretty pervasive. I never heard about the FB comment. How embarrassing.

123 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-10 01:12 ID:YO42PGlY

>>122 I think the paper that made the error was fairly reputable, so people generally assumed it was true. Tom corrected it in a couple of interviews and SF corrected it on her Facebook, but the rumor stuck around for a while. I'll see if I can track down some screencaps, I know they're on the internet somewhere.

Unless of course they WERE secretly married and the paper accidentally spilled the beans. Nothing would surprise me at this point.

124 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-10 01:30 ID:YO42PGlY

Here's Susannah's Facebook post:
http://40.media.tumblr. com/f6610b16efebd85a169a084af312056e/tumblr_inline_nmcqw2bg0Y1r3nf88_500.png

125 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-01-10 01:57 ID:u1vu1eqv

I stand corrected - Thank fuck, they said. Thank you, anonsy.

126 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-10 08:20 ID:Heaven

>>103 if she saw the photos from the Crimson Peak wrap-up party, a couple of weeks before BoraBora, she might have given him an ultimatum. Maybe he should just stay away from photo-booths.

127 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-10 08:28 ID:Heaven

>>120 that's why I mention Sian, because she constitutes a precedent of "just friend".

For the record TH and SF didn't break up in November 2011 and SF only met Oliver Chris in Febr. 2012.

128 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-10 08:35 ID:Heaven

I don't think this was ever posted but this is a photo of EO celebrating Boyd's birthday in Colombia on Sept. 2014
https://www.instagram.com/p/seF8LLISNC/

She doesn't look very excited, maybe she was already thinking of dumping him for her higher profile co-star. The irony of it, considering ISTL bombed, Boyd with Narcos is having quite the good moment and she has to impose her presence with TH and literally jump into photos to remind him she exists.

130 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-10 09:13 ID:RuxZSXOx

>>129 I think she's full of shit.

131 Name: Anon : 2016-01-10 09:37 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>130 She suggests elsewhere it was for copyright violation, which could only be if she had posted a pic to which he owned copyright. The only pics of his on the internet were a few Facebook selfies, and I cannot imagine he would spend the time and money that would require to get those back, especially as they were blogged elsewhere.

As for the location: the most tumblr can do is identify the IP address of an anonymous message (not sure if it can even do this for random views from someone without an account). I checked my IP address and three different geolocation providers suggested Hertfordshire, London and Primrose Hill. Not very precise! Primrose Hill is very close to where TH lives but somewhat less close to where I live so you couldn't reasonably assume that anyone viewing her blog with that geolocation was him. Maybe she thinks my visits are him!

132 Name: N8Anon : 2016-01-10 10:04 ID:p5l+39PD

>>131 Morning. Same here on the Geolocation stuff, it has me in several different locations through North London or surrounding counties. It's not reliable at all.

133 Name: Anon : 2016-01-10 10:11 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>132 I checked the latitude and longitude they gave, for,completeness, and apparently I am dossing down at Charing Cross station!

134 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-10 10:11 ID:Heaven

135 Name: N8Anon : 2016-01-10 10:13 ID:p5l+39PD

>>133 Cosy!

136 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-10 13:34 ID:Heaven

I truly don't think he will attend the GGs because filming for Shitty Island starts Monday and unlike Brie he doesn't have a nomination, but if he is still in LA you'd think he'd go to the BAFTA LA Tea Party, instead he didn't. So I'm fairly certain he might already be in Oz or on his way there.

137 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-10 14:51 ID:Heaven

"GUYS I JUST SAW TOM HIDDLESTON AT LAX I CAN'T STOP SMILING HE'S SO B E A U T I F U L "
https://twitter. com/alinalasagna/status/686065852890791936

138 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-10 15:36 ID:Heaven

A bit from Brie's interview in the Daily Telegraph

"Brie is in Hawaii, filming Kong: Skull Island, where she and co-star Tom Hiddleston are ‘running around in the jungle the whole time, laughing like children’. A greater departure from a cramped shed it is hard to imagine. ‘It’s a bigger production than I’ve ever been involved in, in every way,’ she admits."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/room/brie-larson-interview/

139 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-10 15:49 ID:8c72Ic/o

>>129 Hmmmm, I'm skeptical simply because any official cease and desist letter worth its salt (legal and supportable) isn't sent to a blogger using a blogging site, but to the legal department of the site itself.

I understand that when she started blogging (2011?) Tumblr was a fairly new/small company (hadn't been sold to Yahoo yet). However, they would have still been the first port of call for official legal action.

It wouldn't surprise me - given some of his fans - if some well-meaning Hiddlestoner (ugh, hate that term) mocked something up and sent it along.

It must have been an electronic letter, not? Does tumblr require a physical address to sign up?

140 Name: Anon : 2016-01-10 16:55 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>139 You don't need an address these days. Doubt if you ever have - it is all by email. The initial contact for a copyright violation would be from TH to tumblr, but tumblr would then send a letter to the user demanding that they remove the content. I assume this is what the bike refers to - and that she inferred it was originally from TH because the content was his.

OT: how was your work thing? Does NATO throw a good party?

141 Name: Anon : 2016-01-10 16:56 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>136 >>137

Couch called it right!

142 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-10 17:23 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>140 Ahh, I thought that she was speaking about an official letter directly from TH Inc. (Luke, his people, his lawyer). It's strange that she used the word 'letter' as opposed to 'email.' I guess I'd say something like: 'He sent a letter to Tumblr and they sent me a cease and desist email' or 'He reported me to Tumblr.' Her wording makes it sound more direct.

NATO does, yes - for the big-wigs (I've only been to a few of those - free booze and food, silver service, music). This one was for a mix of less important divisions, so it was just okay. Free food (nice buffet) but only two bottles of wine at a table of eight. And as for company - I was more than happy to slip off to the loo and outside to the smoking balcony (I don't actually smoke) to check twitter and post TCA updates.

143 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-10 17:39 ID:5qEt5bUn

OT story for QAZ (I'm shouting her name, so she hears me!!!):

At the work do someone made a comment about Latvia, but then said 'or maybe I mean Lithuania - they're the same really.'

Oh, no you DIDN'T.

My response: 'No, they are not the same. Where are the fighter planes for the Baltic Air Policing mission based? Lithuania. Who agreed first to commit troops and spearhead a response following the Crimea crises? Lithuania. Which Baltic state has the finest English speakers? Lithuania (I didn't have proof for that one beyond your posts here - still used it). They are not the same.'

Do not mess with Lithuania on my watch. I will defend qaz and her people's reputation! ;)

(Thanks to Anon for reminding me about the do and thus the story.)

144 Name: qaz : 2016-01-11 11:01 ID:wxE9Uiiq

>>143 Wow, Anon. I'm sitting here kind of open-mouthed and also warm and fuzzy inside :) I'm def glad and flattered that you have such a good opinion about LT, and thanks for educating the ignorant part of NATO ;)

TH who? I have hearteyes for you right now :D

Oh, and sorry for not hearing you shout and not replying earlier!

145 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-11 14:48 ID:Heaven

And once again nobody is talking about TH, or Loki for that matter - he has 2 options left in his contract to be used at Marvel's convenience, maybe a small cameo here and one in the Infinity Wars, or both in the Infinity Wars, or nothing at all.

http://www.etonline.com/news/179620_cate_blanchett_joining_thor_3_mark_ruffalo_confirms/

146 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 14:51 ID:bgcXLLLp

>>144

We all love Dottie! She invented the name Pursegate! She made love against an aqueduct with an Italian stud muffin! She rocks NATO with a truly fabulous handbag! Heart eyes!!!

147 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 18:21 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>144 I will always be the TH to your JA. Or the Domhnall Gleeson to your whomever DG is dating! You complete me!

In truth, my knowledge of Lithuania extends to the three things I mentioned, but I wasn't going to let him get away with it, so I was prepared to make up facts. My boldness was helped by the fact that I'd consumed at least 1/3 of our table's wine allotment!

>>146 Actually I think you did - invented the name Pursegate, not the aqueduct business (I've got to hold my hand up to that one). Or maybe you corrected it to Purse-Gategate. Oh, god, remember when she was having an in-depth discussion about Descartes with that damn gate?

>>144 >>146 Heart eyes back!

148 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 18:26 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>145 I vote small cameo, please Marvel gods, small cameo! In both. If EO is in Infinity Wars and they're filming together...urgh, it will be fangirl craziness. I like gossip, but even I don't want that sort of gossipy craziness.

I think Chris Evans said that IW was meant to shot back-to-back this summer and autumn, does anyone remember? It seems like TH may be going from T:R to IW directly without any room for anything in between.

149 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 18:33 ID:5qEt5bUn

So, do we think that the text-less pic of David Bowie (what a shock that was!) is the 'new' Seneca quote?

If anything, this might be a smart way forward for his twitter: work/promo posts and the rare picture only post to reflect on a major event. Maybe re-tweeting co-stars tweets, as he did with Brie.

150 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-11 19:42 ID:Heaven

>>148 I've just read an article about IW and the directors Joe & Anthony Russo say they have a board with 67 characters, Thanos against everyone. So if cameo is going to be it will be small for sure.

151 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-11 19:46 ID:Heaven

>>148 Forgot to add, I hope for him he won't be stuck with filming for Marvel for so long.

152 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-11 19:49 ID:Heaven

http://www.goldcoastbulletin.com.au/entertainment/exclusive-first-shots-as-kong-skull-island-lands-on-the-gold-coast-for-first-days-filming/story-fnj94hgr-1227705163795

"Private security guards and a large police presence surrounded the closed set, which was erected about 1km south of Jumpinpin.

You could not get near the places at all, there were police and security absolutely everywhere,” said one visitor to the island yesterday."

So if someone tweet they saw EO on set you know it's bs

“Filming should keep going until the end of January when the production bumps out but expect several of the stars to stick around.”

153 Name: qaz : 2016-01-11 19:54 ID:wxE9Uiiq

>>146 Yes, plus million!

>>147 That's it, lets ride into the sunset together! Or at least have a group hug or smth :)

OK, back to TH, or we're going to be banished from the thread :)

>>145 >>148 I like Loki as a character in general, I would watch Thor 3 if he returned, but I will certainly survive if TH only has a small cameo, or even nothing at all.
Not even because of EO, I just don't really feel that he (Loki) has anything new to offer that we haven't seen yet and I would rather watch TH in new projects.

>>149 I don't even check TH's twitter lately. I suppose it is a better decision for him to keep it mostly work related, but also - boring.
Not that it was ever very interesting IMO, since songs of the day and inspirational quotes usually only inspire me to unfollow people sharing them. And I wasn't in the fandom yet when he was reportedly more open or genuine, so to say, so I missed all the fun.

OT: I was so shocked when I read about David Bowie this morning, so so incredibly sad.

154 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-11 19:54 ID:SKuCBz5r

Unless they see EO and TH out and about the town. That's how they were sighted in Hawaii, at a farmer's market and I think some cafe.
She's gonna show up. Can't stay away from the Hiddles for long!

155 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 20:07 ID:sddEev2o

>>154 actually EO "was spotted in farmers market " was a post on IG that was just mentioned, there was never any screencap of that post, but even if it really existed, she was spotted there alone, without TH. Don't twist the story

156 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-11 20:28 ID:SKuCBz5r

Not twisting the story. On CB the person who had seen the IG posts about the sightings said it was both TH and EO and something about holding hands? Because I remember the IG post person being quoted as saying they saw Loki and Scarlet Witch. There was never screen caps provided for any of the EO Hawaii sightings except for the Twitter one but as we can all see she was obviously there.

157 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 20:36 ID:sddEev2o

>>156 Ah celebitchy. It explains everything. I know what you mean, but the poster was clearly misinforming others about the IG posts. The tweets you refer to were made by a troll account trolling some crazy fan, but everybody agreed that it's very very doubtful that there can be a IG post mentioning Tom and Lizzie and not found by other th fans except one. So, basically, the IG post never existed. The Twitter user Jamie tangy mentioned them as Loki and scarlet witch. That was the only legit - more or less - truthful sighting. More or less, because no one except that girl saw her, and tweeted about it. And it was on 11th or 12th, when crew had a day and night filming, so I side eye that. Lazer tag collage is the only one proof Lizzie was there -on 23rd, and 25th She was already in L.A. giving some kind of award or something.

158 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-11 20:45 ID:SKuCBz5r

Okay disregarding the IG one, and going off the Twitter one, claims of EO being in Hawaii did turn out to be true. We may hear about her popping up in Oz and unless there are pics people will probably ignore them or call them trolls or attention seekers until some one accidentally posts something and the truth comes out.
Either way, whatever THEO have, EO seems to be doing most of hauling and going out of her way to do it. Shows the level of investment each one has.

159 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-11 20:46 ID:SKuCBz5r

Also was there a video made of the TCA for Night Manager? Have they done videos for TCA in the past?

160 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 20:56 ID:sddEev2o

>>158 agree. Btw Jamie tangy never mentioned them holding hands, just that she saw them. That's all. And again I side eye this tweet too because of filming schedule. My personal opinion is that Lizzie was there for a day or two, perhaps for one weekend, since later after that lazer tag evening we knew and saw photos of TH with his lonesome self when he could spent time with her. Which heavily points to be it was Bora Bora v.2. We all Remeber ehat happened after BB v.1. Lizzie seems to be or was very invested. I doubt she will show up in Oz. But that's me.

>>159 As far as I know no video recordings were made.

161 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-11 21:03 ID:SKuCBz5r

But THEO was sighted again in LA after the Hawaii laser tag outing and then that sighting of her in London and her bestie's IG showing that she was in London too. That's why I feel like she might show up in Australia again. I don't think whatever they have is over yet. Doesn't matter though. In this day and age of social media, everything manages to come out in the open somehow. So we wait and see!

Damn. I really wish there was some videos of TCA. He looked so good in the pics! I want to see that in motion.

162 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 21:10 ID:sddEev2o

>>161 By a gayporndude? But Brie Larson herself said she was having lunch with Tom that day so I go with mistaken identity. Plus this it was somehow silly two right handed people wrapping their arms around each other while eating. Not very handy huh? As for spotted in London - there was a tweet about Tom being in NY at the same day, but since it had nothing to do with Lizzie people ignored it. You see, tweets made by teenagers, gayporndudes and gossip mag journalists (that had their article coming out the same day) are shady. Try to take it with a ... ok, take it with a huge spoon of salt.

163 Name: qaz : 2016-01-11 21:18 ID:wxE9Uiiq

Hm, I have a feeling that probably something more than a FWB situation or Bora Bora v.2 is (or at least was) happening. With Bora Bora, JA at least got to have a vacation on a beautiful tropical island, plus the company of course. Now, if EO was there only for a day or two, do you do something like that for a FBW? Waste your time, money, effort to go there for a couple of days to have a laser tag with their current film crew? I know I wouldn't, unless I considered it "worth it", like something you do for a BF (potential BF?) to stay in touch with them.

Unless she's THAT invested and THAT 'limpety'.

All speculation on my part, of course, since we don't even know for sure how long she was there.

164 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 21:27 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>150 67 characters? WTF? How can those films not be a HOT MESS with 67 characters? AOU was messy enough with all the superheroes.

165 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-11 21:29 ID:Heaven

Just a warning, if Anon ID:sddEev2o derails as usual, feel free to go to the moderator thread and report her.

166 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 21:33 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>161 I don't think TCA events are videoed. At least not in the past.

167 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 21:36 ID:sddEev2o

>>163 I see your point, but I don't understand why people Love to forget the denial at tiff? Some just ignore it as if it never happened.

Now, let's imagine we forgot about the denial. She could have gone there for last try. You don't spent Thanksgiving alone without your GF, when you clearly have time at your hands and do nothing. You invite her to your sisters wedding and go to her sisters wedding. You spent as much time together s you can. You don't ignore her on stage in Nashville making her flap and wave her hands. You don't deny having her in your life. You don't make her follow you but her self to where you are without putting any effort to do the same for her. But you do all the following to FWB.

In addition to this I was curious if people thunk th doesn't care what his fans think and he doesn't "own us shit" why did they both went through strict denial? When you don't care you say no comment or confirm. In my personal opinion -very personal opinion based on what I saw - there isn't much to talk about. If it was Jessica Chastain at lazer tag people wouldn't even think anything. We forget that actually this two - Tom and Lizzie really can be just friends. I don't see the logic in conspiracy theory, I'm sorry. I dint see logic in it being more (the most) Then FWB.

168 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 21:39 ID:5qEt5bUn

169 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-01-11 21:46 ID:s5B9HMwK

@167

They are together so I think you should just learn to cope with it and get over it.
No amount of trying to disprove sightings is going to change that, they are together, end of.

As for Bowie, sad sad news, end of an era :(

170 Name: Annony : 2016-01-11 21:49 ID:s5B9HMwK

The last post was from me and I am not Couch Potato...just clarifying.

All I did was leave the "name" blank.

171 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 21:49 ID:sddEev2o

>>169 hmm no they aren't . Its not just me who doesn't see the meaning of all this. Why are you rude to me? You despise everything I say despite it has more logic then every thing you say just because I say that. And I was polite with everybody. Even with you now.

172 Name: Annony : 2016-01-11 21:56 ID:s5B9HMwK

@171 Not trying to be rude, just honest.

All I am going to say is, I have seen them with my own eyes, and that was enough clarification for me.

173 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 22:00 ID:sddEev2o

>>172 why should I believe you? I don't even know who you are. See you first time posting here.

174 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 22:13 ID:xdK7WmeT

Original Anon here addressing Couch, Dottie. qaz et al. No post since the heart eyes post to Anon. was me. Been out to work do.

175 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-11 22:15 ID:RuxZSXOx

>>174 I wish they'd come up with more distinguishable names. In any case I could tell it wasn't you, don't worry.

176 Name: Annony : 2016-01-11 22:15 ID:s5B9HMwK

@173

Whatever....

177 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 22:18 ID:xdK7WmeT

>>165 Oh yes, you already know that, don't you?

178 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 22:20 ID:xdK7WmeT

>>175 Sorry anonsy, forgot you there for a sec. Blame brain fade after a night in a roomful of lawyers!

179 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-11 22:24 ID:RuxZSXOx

>>178 Haha it's fine, I don't get offended by that sort of thing. I assumed that since you didn't mention me I was "nothing to write home about" and you were going to take me to Bora Bora in a couple months.

180 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 22:24 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>174 We can tell.

181 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 22:25 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>176 Welcome, Annony.

182 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 22:26 ID:xdK7WmeT

>>179 lol. And heart eyes!!

>>180 phew!

183 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 22:28 ID:5qEt5bUn

>>169 Annony, I think most people here do believe they are 'together' in some sort of relationship. The evidence leans toward that conclusion.

I think we like to speculate about what type of relationship, level of investment, etc.

184 Name: anon1 : 2016-01-11 22:28 ID:s/pIh3Nv

>>172 Care to elaborate please?

185 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 22:29 ID:5qEt5bUn

Heart-eyes all around!

It's like Oprah...You get heart-eyes, and you get heart-eyes! Everyone gets heart-eyes!

186 Name: qaz : 2016-01-11 22:50 ID:wxE9Uiiq

>>174 Yup, understood that as well - didn't realise from the first post it was Lex, but it was clear instantly that it wasn't you.

>>185 Well, we've already established that it's a pretty sane and fun board with intelligent and fun posters!

187 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-11 22:51 ID:SKuCBz5r

Do share more! Where and when did you see them? And feel free to add more info that could shed light on the nature of the relationship THEO might have. I feel like it's FWB situation with EO a little more invested in it than Tom.

To Couch, is Anon ID:sddEev2o the firebrenie and JDunn poster who is a lil one flew over the cuckoo's nest? If so her denial makes sense. Actually, there a few other people, some posters on lipstick alley who are also dead convinced that there is nothing going on between THEO. Their reasoning sounds very much like the "LALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU!" type.

188 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-11 22:54 ID:SKuCBz5r

Oh I thought it would link to post 172 but it didn't :( how do you reply to someone post? Sorry I'm a complete ditz at this. Is there a link I should read before posting? I was so excited about finding some sane TH fans to discuss this THEO thing with and kinda got carried away in the enthusiasm. Sorry about the confusion!

189 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 22:57 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>188

To link to a post:

Click on the number next to the post. It will then show up in your text box.

or

>>188 (two right-pointing arrows and then the number - no spaces.

190 Name: qaz : 2016-01-11 22:57 ID:wxE9Uiiq

>>187 Welcome, NewAnon. Yes, it's her. Here we also know her as Lex, Cabbage Anon, if I remember correctly, and maybe some other names.

>>188 You just write double arrows (>>) and indicate the post number without a space.

191 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-11 23:18 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>189>>190 Got it! Thank you so much guys!

Okay so it is her. After JVR's IG fiasco, pretty much most fans have accepted THEO are together or seeing each other in some capacity. With the exception of Lex and a few others who ship Tom with either Emma Watson or Hayley Atwell. They're still having trouble with the idea of Tom with an Olsen.

192 Name: Annony : 2016-01-11 23:22 ID:s5B9HMwK

Thanks for the welcome, tried to post this before but it ate the post saying that the code was wrong.

@184/187: It's really not that interesting but here it goes anyway. I saw them last Friday morning at a gas station in Old Pas (Pasadena). Was a little surprised to look up and see Loki getting out of a black SUV, behind him this petite blonde woman got out as well and they stood by the car and kissed and hugged while he was talking to the driver. It was all very quick, I didn't talk to them or go up to them because it just felt like if I did it would have been too creepy. I just finished filling up my car with gas and I drove off. I had heard rumors that they were together but after seeing them in person, I just thought "oh I guess the rumors are true" shrug.

BTW: Elizabeth really favors her sisters, I met one of the twins years ago and the resemblance..wow. She's taller though and not as tiny, but same face shape.

@173 again whatever. Not telling you to believe me but I am going to say this in the nicest way possible, you really need to get a grip, honestly.

193 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-11 23:36 ID:RuxZSXOx

>>187 I agree with you about the FWB thing, and that she's definitely more into it than he is... much like the situation with JA, which, keep in mind, went on for a year and a half and only ended after some unknown explosion in Bora Bora (something to do with the photograph? her favoriting tweets about them as a couple? who knows).

Tom the workaholic seems to find someone whose company he enjoys as a friend to some level but isn't what he's looking for in a serious partner, she's willing, they carry on until the woman's level of investment becomes too much or she tries to push him into a bigger commitment, and then it ends. Unless something goes "wrong" there's no reason for Tom to end it - he likely prefers having a thoroughly vetted FWB he feels like he can trust as opposed to casual hookups with people he doesn't know well. Also, when you have a FWB you can more or less rely on regularly scheduled, um, Benefits when you need them.

One more thing, someone (qaz? I think it was you) said something upthread about traveling to Hawaii being too committal for a FWB, but EO has always been a globetrotter, and for someone with her money and resources taking a brief trip out to Hawaii is more like a regular person driving a couple of hours. Even before ISTL she was always flying out to London, Paris, NYC, and other random cities for no particular reason.

194 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 23:39 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>192 As >>191 said, the vast majority on this board came to the conclusion that there's a relationship through all of the sightings. As I've said, so much smoke, but no fire? We're just waiting to see if they go public, how they introduce it and so on.

What is interesting now is, if they go public, how do they work the timeline.

We've discussed that Pap night was perhaps meant to be their debut, but it didn't go to plan (her behavior), fans' reactions and the dodgy timeline regarding her broken engagement.

>>18 Anon mentioned that if they go public, they need to find a plausible timeline that dodges the homewrecker label for TH and...well, any number of labels for poor EO.

Thanks for your insights, Annony! Please stick around and enjoy the ride!

195 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 23:43 ID:xdK7WmeT

>>193 Well said. Who would want a casual hookup with the risk they tell all to some rag?

I think Europeans have a different attitude to distance (well, Brits do anyway). I have American fiends who would drive 2 hours to get a pizza. If you drive for 2 hours in the UK you are in a completely different part of the country (unless you are trying to cross London from one side to another). I would NEVER drive 2h for a FWB. I'd call that a committed relationship!

196 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 23:48 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>193 I think it's probably the nature of any relationship with TH that the woman is 'more invested'. He's 34 and is hungry for success, critical praise, award wining roles and all those things actors want. She's 26, seems somewhat ambivalent about her career (start booking those gigs, girl) and started this relationship after ending a engagement/3 year relationship. Of course she's going to be more invested, but who knows, she just may tame the Hiddles!

197 Name: Anon : 2016-01-11 23:50 ID:xdK7WmeT

>>194 It's the TIFF denial by EO that screws it up. I'd rather they just said "yeah we lied at TIFF because you're a bunch of nosy bastards" but I doubt very much they will do that, so they have to now pretend that they got it together after that.

Whether this one will go public I don't know. As with the JArthy I feel a pushmepullyou about that, with her saying yes and him saying no. Something a bit more than pure publicity shyness, I sense.

198 Name: Anon. : 2016-01-11 23:51 ID:3MF+ks8/

>>195 Two hours for a pizza! Are they from Montana? That has got to be a damn good pizza.

199 Name: NewAnon : 2016-01-11 23:53 ID:SKuCBz5r

>>192 Seems like he took her with him to the TCA if they were seen in Pasadena. Either she went there with him or hung around the town while he worked.

>>193 You're right. With Jane Arthy, I think she may have expected something more when they went to Bora Bora but he probably declined. Her deleting her twitter and starting all over again was very telling.

I feel like all his FWB things start out with the female friend saying she's cool with everything being casual with the expectation that if she hangs out around him long enough and makes her available to him all the time, he'll commit to her but seems like that tactic goes downhill. If Elizabeth dumped her fiance to be with him and they've been FWB for a whole year, she may want some commitment from him. She doesn't seem to have anything lined up apart from Marvel. There was talk last year of her doing Taylor Sheridan's Wind River with Chris Pine but no word on that movie. She's usually had 1-2 projects in a year in the past. But if she's put that career on hold for ol' Tommy boy, girl may just be looking for long term commitment from him.

I feel like they'll just decide to keep it all quiet and play the "please we're too dignified, we're not going to share our private life with you" and these sightings will continue until they break up or Tom decides she's the one and they hitch it up. FWIW, I don't think they're going to get hitched. I get a feeling it may fizzle out by this summer.

200 Name: anonsy : 2016-01-11 23:54 ID:RuxZSXOx

>>196 True, especially if one of the reasons she ended her engagement was that she had gotten involved with Tom or even just for the possibility of getting with him. If you end a 3-year long relationship for a shot at something, you're going to try your best to make it happen.

Honestly though, I just can't see the Hiddles being tamed by someone who has confessed to not reading books.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.