Correlation does not imply castration
>>426,427correlation does not equal causation'' bothers me because
correlation does not imply causation'' is a stronger statement and usually is what such a person meant anyway
i dont think its cope to bring it up when discussing an event that a cognitive bias might make human perception of an event inaccurate but maybe you're seeing something i'm not
i commonly discard arguments on the basis of selection bias but ``correlation =\> causation'' is occasionally useful too