Thread to talk about actor Tom Hiddleston
Tom Hiddleston 1: http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1382608996/
Tom Hiddleston 2: http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1410345704/
Tom Hiddleston 3: http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1437479014/
Tom Hiddleston 4: http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1440684211/
Tom Hiddleston 5: http://4-ch.net/tv/kareha.pl/1445094141/
>>148 Forgot to add, I hope for him he won't be stuck with filming for Marvel for so long.
"Private security guards and a large police presence surrounded the closed set, which was erected about 1km south of Jumpinpin.
You could not get near the places at all, there were police and security absolutely everywhere,” said one visitor to the island yesterday."
So if someone tweet they saw EO on set you know it's bs
“Filming should keep going until the end of January when the production bumps out but expect several of the stars to stick around.”
>>146 Yes, plus million!
>>147 That's it, lets ride into the sunset together! Or at least have a group hug or smth :)
OK, back to TH, or we're going to be banished from the thread :)
>>145 >>148 I like Loki as a character in general, I would watch Thor 3 if he returned, but I will certainly survive if TH only has a small cameo, or even nothing at all.
Not even because of EO, I just don't really feel that he (Loki) has anything new to offer that we haven't seen yet and I would rather watch TH in new projects.
>>149 I don't even check TH's twitter lately. I suppose it is a better decision for him to keep it mostly work related, but also - boring.
Not that it was ever very interesting IMO, since songs of the day and inspirational quotes usually only inspire me to unfollow people sharing them. And I wasn't in the fandom yet when he was reportedly more open or genuine, so to say, so I missed all the fun.
OT: I was so shocked when I read about David Bowie this morning, so so incredibly sad.
Unless they see EO and TH out and about the town. That's how they were sighted in Hawaii, at a farmer's market and I think some cafe.
She's gonna show up. Can't stay away from the Hiddles for long!
>>154 actually EO "was spotted in farmers market " was a post on IG that was just mentioned, there was never any screencap of that post, but even if it really existed, she was spotted there alone, without TH. Don't twist the story
Not twisting the story. On CB the person who had seen the IG posts about the sightings said it was both TH and EO and something about holding hands? Because I remember the IG post person being quoted as saying they saw Loki and Scarlet Witch. There was never screen caps provided for any of the EO Hawaii sightings except for the Twitter one but as we can all see she was obviously there.
>>156 Ah celebitchy. It explains everything. I know what you mean, but the poster was clearly misinforming others about the IG posts. The tweets you refer to were made by a troll account trolling some crazy fan, but everybody agreed that it's very very doubtful that there can be a IG post mentioning Tom and Lizzie and not found by other th fans except one. So, basically, the IG post never existed. The Twitter user Jamie tangy mentioned them as Loki and scarlet witch. That was the only legit - more or less - truthful sighting. More or less, because no one except that girl saw her, and tweeted about it. And it was on 11th or 12th, when crew had a day and night filming, so I side eye that. Lazer tag collage is the only one proof Lizzie was there -on 23rd, and 25th She was already in L.A. giving some kind of award or something.
Okay disregarding the IG one, and going off the Twitter one, claims of EO being in Hawaii did turn out to be true. We may hear about her popping up in Oz and unless there are pics people will probably ignore them or call them trolls or attention seekers until some one accidentally posts something and the truth comes out.
Either way, whatever THEO have, EO seems to be doing most of hauling and going out of her way to do it. Shows the level of investment each one has.
Also was there a video made of the TCA for Night Manager? Have they done videos for TCA in the past?
>>158 agree. Btw Jamie tangy never mentioned them holding hands, just that she saw them. That's all. And again I side eye this tweet too because of filming schedule. My personal opinion is that Lizzie was there for a day or two, perhaps for one weekend, since later after that lazer tag evening we knew and saw photos of TH with his lonesome self when he could spent time with her. Which heavily points to be it was Bora Bora v.2. We all Remeber ehat happened after BB v.1. Lizzie seems to be or was very invested. I doubt she will show up in Oz. But that's me.
>>159 As far as I know no video recordings were made.
But THEO was sighted again in LA after the Hawaii laser tag outing and then that sighting of her in London and her bestie's IG showing that she was in London too. That's why I feel like she might show up in Australia again. I don't think whatever they have is over yet. Doesn't matter though. In this day and age of social media, everything manages to come out in the open somehow. So we wait and see!
Damn. I really wish there was some videos of TCA. He looked so good in the pics! I want to see that in motion.
>>161 By a gayporndude? But Brie Larson herself said she was having lunch with Tom that day so I go with mistaken identity. Plus this it was somehow silly two right handed people wrapping their arms around each other while eating. Not very handy huh? As for spotted in London - there was a tweet about Tom being in NY at the same day, but since it had nothing to do with Lizzie people ignored it. You see, tweets made by teenagers, gayporndudes and gossip mag journalists (that had their article coming out the same day) are shady. Try to take it with a ... ok, take it with a huge spoon of salt.
Hm, I have a feeling that probably something more than a FWB situation or Bora Bora v.2 is (or at least was) happening. With Bora Bora, JA at least got to have a vacation on a beautiful tropical island, plus the company of course. Now, if EO was there only for a day or two, do you do something like that for a FBW? Waste your time, money, effort to go there for a couple of days to have a laser tag with their current film crew? I know I wouldn't, unless I considered it "worth it", like something you do for a BF (potential BF?) to stay in touch with them.
Unless she's THAT invested and THAT 'limpety'.
All speculation on my part, of course, since we don't even know for sure how long she was there.
>>150 67 characters? WTF? How can those films not be a HOT MESS with 67 characters? AOU was messy enough with all the superheroes.
Just a warning, if Anon ID:sddEev2o derails as usual, feel free to go to the moderator thread and report her.
>>161 I don't think TCA events are videoed. At least not in the past.
>>163 I see your point, but I don't understand why people Love to forget the denial at tiff? Some just ignore it as if it never happened.
Now, let's imagine we forgot about the denial. She could have gone there for last try. You don't spent Thanksgiving alone without your GF, when you clearly have time at your hands and do nothing. You invite her to your sisters wedding and go to her sisters wedding. You spent as much time together s you can. You don't ignore her on stage in Nashville making her flap and wave her hands. You don't deny having her in your life. You don't make her follow you but her self to where you are without putting any effort to do the same for her. But you do all the following to FWB.
In addition to this I was curious if people thunk th doesn't care what his fans think and he doesn't "own us shit" why did they both went through strict denial? When you don't care you say no comment or confirm. In my personal opinion -very personal opinion based on what I saw - there isn't much to talk about. If it was Jessica Chastain at lazer tag people wouldn't even think anything. We forget that actually this two - Tom and Lizzie really can be just friends. I don't see the logic in conspiracy theory, I'm sorry. I dint see logic in it being more (the most) Then FWB.
@167
They are together so I think you should just learn to cope with it and get over it.
No amount of trying to disprove sightings is going to change that, they are together, end of.
As for Bowie, sad sad news, end of an era :(
The last post was from me and I am not Couch Potato...just clarifying.
All I did was leave the "name" blank.
>>169 hmm no they aren't . Its not just me who doesn't see the meaning of all this. Why are you rude to me? You despise everything I say despite it has more logic then every thing you say just because I say that. And I was polite with everybody. Even with you now.
@171 Not trying to be rude, just honest.
All I am going to say is, I have seen them with my own eyes, and that was enough clarification for me.
>>172 why should I believe you? I don't even know who you are. See you first time posting here.
Original Anon here addressing Couch, Dottie. qaz et al. No post since the heart eyes post to Anon. was me. Been out to work do.
>>174 I wish they'd come up with more distinguishable names. In any case I could tell it wasn't you, don't worry.
@173
Whatever....
>>175 Sorry anonsy, forgot you there for a sec. Blame brain fade after a night in a roomful of lawyers!
>>178 Haha it's fine, I don't get offended by that sort of thing. I assumed that since you didn't mention me I was "nothing to write home about" and you were going to take me to Bora Bora in a couple months.
>>169 Annony, I think most people here do believe they are 'together' in some sort of relationship. The evidence leans toward that conclusion.
I think we like to speculate about what type of relationship, level of investment, etc.
Heart-eyes all around!
It's like Oprah...You get heart-eyes, and you get heart-eyes! Everyone gets heart-eyes!
Do share more! Where and when did you see them? And feel free to add more info that could shed light on the nature of the relationship THEO might have. I feel like it's FWB situation with EO a little more invested in it than Tom.
To Couch, is Anon ID:sddEev2o the firebrenie and JDunn poster who is a lil one flew over the cuckoo's nest? If so her denial makes sense. Actually, there a few other people, some posters on lipstick alley who are also dead convinced that there is nothing going on between THEO. Their reasoning sounds very much like the "LALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU!" type.
Oh I thought it would link to post 172 but it didn't :( how do you reply to someone post? Sorry I'm a complete ditz at this. Is there a link I should read before posting? I was so excited about finding some sane TH fans to discuss this THEO thing with and kinda got carried away in the enthusiasm. Sorry about the confusion!
>>189>>190 Got it! Thank you so much guys!
Okay so it is her. After JVR's IG fiasco, pretty much most fans have accepted THEO are together or seeing each other in some capacity. With the exception of Lex and a few others who ship Tom with either Emma Watson or Hayley Atwell. They're still having trouble with the idea of Tom with an Olsen.
Thanks for the welcome, tried to post this before but it ate the post saying that the code was wrong.
@184/187: It's really not that interesting but here it goes anyway. I saw them last Friday morning at a gas station in Old Pas (Pasadena). Was a little surprised to look up and see Loki getting out of a black SUV, behind him this petite blonde woman got out as well and they stood by the car and kissed and hugged while he was talking to the driver. It was all very quick, I didn't talk to them or go up to them because it just felt like if I did it would have been too creepy. I just finished filling up my car with gas and I drove off. I had heard rumors that they were together but after seeing them in person, I just thought "oh I guess the rumors are true" shrug.
BTW: Elizabeth really favors her sisters, I met one of the twins years ago and the resemblance..wow. She's taller though and not as tiny, but same face shape.
@173 again whatever. Not telling you to believe me but I am going to say this in the nicest way possible, you really need to get a grip, honestly.
>>187 I agree with you about the FWB thing, and that she's definitely more into it than he is... much like the situation with JA, which, keep in mind, went on for a year and a half and only ended after some unknown explosion in Bora Bora (something to do with the photograph? her favoriting tweets about them as a couple? who knows).
Tom the workaholic seems to find someone whose company he enjoys as a friend to some level but isn't what he's looking for in a serious partner, she's willing, they carry on until the woman's level of investment becomes too much or she tries to push him into a bigger commitment, and then it ends. Unless something goes "wrong" there's no reason for Tom to end it - he likely prefers having a thoroughly vetted FWB he feels like he can trust as opposed to casual hookups with people he doesn't know well. Also, when you have a FWB you can more or less rely on regularly scheduled, um, Benefits when you need them.
One more thing, someone (qaz? I think it was you) said something upthread about traveling to Hawaii being too committal for a FWB, but EO has always been a globetrotter, and for someone with her money and resources taking a brief trip out to Hawaii is more like a regular person driving a couple of hours. Even before ISTL she was always flying out to London, Paris, NYC, and other random cities for no particular reason.
>>192 As >>191 said, the vast majority on this board came to the conclusion that there's a relationship through all of the sightings. As I've said, so much smoke, but no fire? We're just waiting to see if they go public, how they introduce it and so on.
What is interesting now is, if they go public, how do they work the timeline.
We've discussed that Pap night was perhaps meant to be their debut, but it didn't go to plan (her behavior), fans' reactions and the dodgy timeline regarding her broken engagement.
>>18 Anon mentioned that if they go public, they need to find a plausible timeline that dodges the homewrecker label for TH and...well, any number of labels for poor EO.
Thanks for your insights, Annony! Please stick around and enjoy the ride!
>>193 Well said. Who would want a casual hookup with the risk they tell all to some rag?
I think Europeans have a different attitude to distance (well, Brits do anyway). I have American fiends who would drive 2 hours to get a pizza. If you drive for 2 hours in the UK you are in a completely different part of the country (unless you are trying to cross London from one side to another). I would NEVER drive 2h for a FWB. I'd call that a committed relationship!
>>193 I think it's probably the nature of any relationship with TH that the woman is 'more invested'. He's 34 and is hungry for success, critical praise, award wining roles and all those things actors want. She's 26, seems somewhat ambivalent about her career (start booking those gigs, girl) and started this relationship after ending a engagement/3 year relationship. Of course she's going to be more invested, but who knows, she just may tame the Hiddles!
>>194 It's the TIFF denial by EO that screws it up. I'd rather they just said "yeah we lied at TIFF because you're a bunch of nosy bastards" but I doubt very much they will do that, so they have to now pretend that they got it together after that.
Whether this one will go public I don't know. As with the JArthy I feel a pushmepullyou about that, with her saying yes and him saying no. Something a bit more than pure publicity shyness, I sense.
>>195 Two hours for a pizza! Are they from Montana? That has got to be a damn good pizza.
>>192 Seems like he took her with him to the TCA if they were seen in Pasadena. Either she went there with him or hung around the town while he worked.
>>193 You're right. With Jane Arthy, I think she may have expected something more when they went to Bora Bora but he probably declined. Her deleting her twitter and starting all over again was very telling.
I feel like all his FWB things start out with the female friend saying she's cool with everything being casual with the expectation that if she hangs out around him long enough and makes her available to him all the time, he'll commit to her but seems like that tactic goes downhill. If Elizabeth dumped her fiance to be with him and they've been FWB for a whole year, she may want some commitment from him. She doesn't seem to have anything lined up apart from Marvel. There was talk last year of her doing Taylor Sheridan's Wind River with Chris Pine but no word on that movie. She's usually had 1-2 projects in a year in the past. But if she's put that career on hold for ol' Tommy boy, girl may just be looking for long term commitment from him.
I feel like they'll just decide to keep it all quiet and play the "please we're too dignified, we're not going to share our private life with you" and these sightings will continue until they break up or Tom decides she's the one and they hitch it up. FWIW, I don't think they're going to get hitched. I get a feeling it may fizzle out by this summer.
>>196 True, especially if one of the reasons she ended her engagement was that she had gotten involved with Tom or even just for the possibility of getting with him. If you end a 3-year long relationship for a shot at something, you're going to try your best to make it happen.
Honestly though, I just can't see the Hiddles being tamed by someone who has confessed to not reading books.
>>196 Maybe, maybe. I've been around the block enough to have seen that with that type of man it is rarely the "endlessly available" girl who does the taming. Men who never have to chase tend mostly to be entranced by the woman they have to chase.
>>199 If she was at the TCA event then someone surely would have seen her. If Annony's story is indeed true then she must have been hanging around town waiting for him to finish. How boring.
>>197 They both sort of denied it. She did it outright, but in a joint interview, he implied it - or at least didn't disagree when asked if they were just friends.
Why or why? They should have said 'no comment' or structured the interviews to stay away from their private lives.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say...drum roll...this looks like a relationship. Long distance, casual, but something a step or two above just FWB. Now whether they're on the same step...ummm, see >>196.
>>202 Okay, now I understand. In Indiana, you HAVE to drive 2 hours for decent pizza.
>>192 Thanks for sharing, Annony!
>>193 Yeah, it was me with the too committal thing :) Sure, the money is not a problem for her, I agree, and she does seem to put more effort than he. But for me it's probably not so much her visit to HI, but the fact that they spent time together with his friends/colleagues, plus all the sightings, plus all those tabloid stories... Of course I can be wrong, it's all just guess-work. We'll have to wait and see!
Oh, and although I think that it may be something more than FWB, I don't really see them ending up together. I can imagine 'dating' of sorts for some time and then a break up. But then again, who knows, they may surprise us!
>>204 Yes I remember. In retrospect his "implied" denial is closer to a "no comment" than people believed at the time, due to her having done the dirty work with the outright denial.
Yes, I agree that "no comment" was the only way to go. Some of the madder nannies are accusing anyone expressing an interest of "acting entitled", but really! You create that sense of entitlement by drawing attention in May 15 to a relationship that nobody had rumbled, and then by pap night and the denials etc.
(Putting this out there, if Tom Hiddleston was my FWB and I had a million dollars and no work to do, I'd sure as hell fly out to Hawaii to see him for a day, regardless of whether or not I thought the relationship was going to get more serious.)
>>207 I swear there was another interview from TIFF where the author mentioned asking Tom if he was single and getting a definite yes from him, but I can't find it anywhere.
>>192 >>199 >>203 If it was Friday morning, the TCA was held at a hotel (a very nice hotel) in Pasadena, so I can imagine that he stayed with her after arriving - maybe she even did the airport run (in that case she is WAY more invested - ugh, the LAX airport run!). His driver picks him up at her place, she tags along, waits in his hotel room during his press work, and then...party time!
Off to write some THEO fanfiction....
>>203 lol that seems to be her thing though. Hanging around Tom to finish up whatever he's doing so they could spend time together.
>>206 Could be a slow burn type of relationship. If he's not hiding her from his colleagues and friends, then he's probably not ashamed of being seen with her. Then it's a regular relationship then that's taking longer to run its course since TH is busy working and can't spend long amounts of time with her unless EO is the one making the effort to come see him.
Oh, and a personal anecdote - I had a good friend who was in a FWB relationship for a bit more than half a year... at least that's what he thought. She was going around telling people he was her boyfriend and even bitched some other girl out for getting too close to him. A mutual friend confronted her about it and she admitted that she had developed feelings for him and thought she could shift the relationship into something more serious, but it went terribly wrong. These were adult people, mid-twenties. It happens.
>>208 Internet high-rive coming anonsy's way! Also speaking truth to power!
>>207 Well, going back to that May 15 article, we had decided that this was EO's work, as USWeekly is her mag of choice - exclusives with her engagement, end of engagement.
Maybe since she leaked, she had to do the outright lying at TIFF when they decided to pull the turtle's head in.
>>212 That's what I've mostly seen in FWBs. One party is usually always more emotionally invested and thinks if they play it cool for long enough the other party will come around and it'll be a happily ever after.
It never happens though. I haven't seen any FWB turn into a stable relationship. I've just seen the guy get bullied or emotionally blackmailed into being with the girl but then it all goes downhill really fast since he doesn't really want to be with her like that.
>>211 It has to be casual/slow burn, just because they so rarely see each other. And there were plenty of times - long stretches - when they could have been together (end of July, all of August), but weren't.
Even if they wanted to throw people off the scent, there are ways to do that while still being together, i.e., vacation to some rather remote place or the opposite: NYC - anyone can get lost in NYC.
>>215 I'm not understanding why. If they are really in a secret boyfriend-girlfriend relationship, why 1) leak it to the press, 2) do pap night, 3) outright deny it, and then 4) be all lovey dovey in public places? I'd even get being caught once by fans, maybe twice, but surely their PR is aware and therefore they are aware too of all the social media sightings. For God's sake the first sneaky fan pic was sold to the Daily Mail! They KNOW people are watching them! If they were really wanting secrecy, wouldn't they be more... secretive?
>>217 Maybe they were seeing each other during then but got lucky and weren't spotted?
I keep getting the feeling they hangout according to Tom's schedule rather than hers. So if he's busy and can't make time then she doesn't visit.
>>218 There are so many possibilities for that article. She wanted to establish their relationship in the public sphere or they both wanted to leak it to get people talking before ISTL (leverage a real relationship). Maybe it wasn't a planned leak, but someone sighted them together and sold the story (maybe someone on the ISTL set?).
Relationship wise, he seems to like to keep his head below the parapet, so I would think that he wanted this relationship introduced via a tabloid. But who knows at this point.
>>220 But none of it makes sense to me, not just the initial article. If I imagine it to be any possible scenario, from just friends all the way up to serious relationship, or even some progression from one to the other, everything that they've said and done seems completely illogical. Which is why I always end up circling back to FWB, because that's what seems to best fit all of the evidence.
>>221 If - if - there is one thing we've ALL agreed on, it's that nothing makes complete sense in this situation. But I think that's part of the fun; we get to gossip and speculate as we try to make it make sense!
None of us will ever know the truth until TH publishes his official biography, i.d., the only book EO will ever be eager to read! There will be an entire chapter - or series of chapters - addressing the 'EO Years.'
Chapter Three: She Has More Chemistry with the Gate: Pap Night '15
Chapter Four: We Draw Straws to See Who Gets to Lie at TIFF (Alternate Title: It Was Just Dinner!!)
Chapter Five: 'I Mean We're Definitely Friends' (with Benefits)
Chapter Six: For Fuck's Sake, Jordan: The Laser Tag Scandal
Hell, this relationship might get its own volume in TH's five-part memoirs!
>>222 LOL that's gold!
>>221 anonsy, a lot of the confusion has to do with the poorly done tabloid leaks and EO's freakout during pap night. If those leaks and pap night was supposed to be their coming out, then someone should get fired because they botched it up. They could've have a great coming out as a couple at TIFF if done right but maybe TH and EO's publicists dropped the ball somewhere.
>>221 Quite. There is one other possible scenario but since it seems to me we have more than one troll posting here at this point, it's just easier to wait.
Kong: Skull Island set
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxD4Q9vgV9E
he posted on fb about ISTL
https://www.facebook.com/twhiddleston/posts/1017246728319112
this might be the "new seneca" quote.
That (>>222) is why I love this board and the cool and funny people who post here! If you read back the old boards (not sure how long you've been lurking) there are many more. It's fun to speculate...!
I have read everyone's wise comments and YES to all of it especially >>199 which rings very true on the basis of what we hav seen.
A couple more oddities:
1)US Weekly really did come out of a clear sky which is why I think it came from them/her. There were no pap pics or speculative articles and (as I have said before) no sightings from nw3anon who pretended after US Weekly she had seen them together back in Jan). Whether to establish a timeline, to generate publicity for ISTL (seems a bit early though) or to forcibly introduce herself to he mother of his FWB, who knows.
2) Let's not forget the looooong gap between Pursegategate and TIFF when TH was in London not working and she was in LA not working (and spotted by paps various times). No sign at all that they met up during that period. He doesn't seem to have been up to much - that guardian article, the gq shoot, the Coriolanus commentary - but no contact. This relationship seems to blow hot and cold - or did they take a break after Pursegategate and take it up again in HI? He seems to be blowing hot at the moment - though that coincides with a geographically convenient time with filming in HI and lots of flights via LAX.
3) >>226 Quite.
>>228 And do you remember after Pursegategate he posted on FB about how grateful he was for all his fans?!!!!! He takes to FB to express his love for us all after any social media storm.
>>230 the limit of 140 character must be a torture for him :)
>>231 I think he used up more than 140 characters just on the HW quotes in that Facebook post.
Wow. What a story. I'm impressed, perhaps >>192 need to start writing fanfiction or something, sounds so "conviencing".
But may I ask why the simple and pure logic cant stand against the specualtion and gossiping? Maybe because the truth is simple and its boring to talk about it and its far more intreresting to talk about non existing things because you can give your fantasy a go?
At least I can screencap the conversations I had with a person who was extra in SI and lived in Hawaii and not far from the place where Tom was renting his place and show the evidence, but why - why? - the words of >>192 are taken as truth when mine or any other persons who actually uses logic are taken as crap and stupid denial? Maybe because it suits the fantasy of some people? I'm ready to bet that If i wasnt posting anything now this Annony person wouldnt even pop up with their " story".
>>221 Thats right. It is illogical if you put it through "they are together" but if you take it as it is - friends , co workers - then it is logical. Because the photo evidences are actually rather simple - they arent kissing, hugguing and doing all the other things. And you could actually expect it from a photo that I'm sure Tom wasnt expecting to be posted.
>>209 I give a support because yes, there was an interview, if you like I can find it.
And I seriosly have an impression that there are just 5-6 people running all over the web - herem, L-Alley, tumblr and say one and the same things so they seem like a mass. Some dont even bother to change their posts - just copy paste it.
>>231 Couch, I'm noy going to troll anyone. And I'm not trolling anyone. I'm sincerely confused by everything people say.
>>233 lex, I'm hardly your biggest fan, actually quite the opposite, I honestly can't stand you at all, especially because I know they kind of things you were posting last here on tumblr, so I know the level of your delusion and obsession.
But, for once, I wasn't even referring to you.
That being said, can't you just let go and go back to your twitter? Things are the way they are, which is either they are together in one acronym form or another, or they are not.
You coming here to the rescue, as if we need you to do our thinking, not only doesn't make any difference, but given your reputation it pisses people off to the point where even if you say something sensible they are going to ignore you.
Morning! I find all of this stuff so confusing!
>>234 At least you admit things I say have logic, I think I will be happy-ish with that?..
But let me ask you this and I really want a reply - as you can see I'm just sincerely curious, because I try to see what some others see. Sorry in advance for long post - you can delete it later.
I dont see the delusion and obsession. I dont like EO to the point of hate but its not just because of Tom. Things I was saying have a strong back up of evidence from people who actually are or were around Tom, again, as I said, I can show names and screecaps of things they were telling me. What about others? I honestly dont see the reason of gossiping after the clear as a day reply to that siatuation at TIFF. All I remeber that some nearly chocked from happiness after the first article, and went right in denial calling Tom and Lizzie liars when they said they arent dating. Wasnt THAT delusional? Wasnt that crazy? Everybody asked them to say something ( fans I mean), they said something, but some didnt like it because it didnt fit the fantasy or juicy gossip. If the "liars!" thing came after any photo ( like JVR posted) I couldve understand the reaction and words, but right after the denial? So, honestly, to me ( and not only me thanks god, there are people who think the same) people who are trying hard to push it into something more then what has been said by subjects themselves - they seen delusioanl, obsesive and crazy gossipers. Dont forget all of this began from gossip - and it was Toby who first started predicting "the relationship" and pushing it hard. It then went where it went.
I'm not trying to rescue anyone ot snything, I'm still just trying to make others see the other side of the story, because people who think like me are clearly scared to death to come out with teir ideas because they are labeled as crazies, and yes, I mean other posters like Gaga Doll on L-Alley and couple of others who agree with her.
>>234 just to add to everything I said above: sometimes the easiest explanation is the right one, because you know that truth is always simple. And the easiest explanation is that two grown up people addressed the situation they could ignore ( nobody was poking mics in their faces or chasing them to get an asnwer) and made a statement. We know what kind of statement.
>>229 I've been lurking here since thread 4. I did try posting once, made that error where I left the name field blank and ended up with Couch's name lol. Got caught up with work so I couldn't post for a while but I did come and read whenever I got the chance.
I like it here. No one is taking the THEO stuff so seriously and having fun speculating and gossiping and cracking jokes. I don't like the extreme opinions of full blown denial of THEO or the full blown THEO 4eva!
Also, thanks! I'm 199 too and that's my take on THEO so far. I think they perhaps may have wanted to come out (or at least one of them may have) but botched up on the tabloid leaks by using the timeline of "sparks flew on set" because the public thought she was still engaged then and therefore, THEO got a barrage of those homewrecker cheating comments. Then they went underground and their PR did deflection pieces until they decide to come out later with the timeline of "things got serious at TIFF for these two friends of four years" blah blah but then Boyd's interview may have thrown another wrench in their plans so now they're probably just laying low.
Or they don't care. It's no strings attached fun and they hook up whenever Tom is available because the way she flies over to see him whenever he may be, home or working on set, it seems like it's more around his schedule than hers.
"kermit.de_frogGot to make Lunch for the awesome Tom Hiddleston and had a quick chat."
https://www.instagram.com/p/BAcQO6wlFw5/
Well, the collage photo amde it to LaineyGossip
http://www.laineygossip.com/Tom-Hiddleston-promotes-The-Night-Manager-and-likely-still-together-with-Elizabeth-Olsen/42744
does this mean it's probably going to make it to JustJared?
She has got the wrong story. She says "they were together whe the tabloids called it over"; she should be saying "they were [?] together when they had said they weren't." I will laugh at whatever Michael has to say at Dlisted. Don't know about JJ: will he publish given that JVR has taken it down, implying it's a "private" pic not a pre-authorised pic of EO fondling a carrot at her local farmers' market?
@233, what I saw in front of my own eyes was proof enough for me. shrug
I've been reading this board for a while and I just thought I'd say something that's all. The two people I saw looked like a couple, and that was my impression. I don't know exactly where in their attachment they currently are, if they are fwb or bf/gf or even married. They didn't tell me and I don't have a horse in this race.
>>242 JVR's personal assistant and Olly's BFF didn't take down his regram, since that's the pic Lainey posted it's not private.
>>223 'Dropped the ball' - Okay, so there are two things we can ALL agree on.
Dropped the ball - you think! They dropped the ball, it caught on fire, then exploded (like a Christmas hoverboard). They've put out the fire and - I think - are trying to clumsily glue together the charred pieces. That should work out just fine.
Meanwhile, Luke is buying stock in Just for Men hair dye and Pepto Bismol.
>>235 Yeah, N8Anon, we need some sort of THEO gossip/speculation/theory flowchart. I need the same when watching Game of Thrones: 'Who's that? What's his name? Is he good or bad? Where the hell are they?'
TH's love life is like Game of Thrones, but with fewer dragons.
>>242 Lainey's 'missing the point' story is strange, because SHE herself interviewed both at TIFF and commented on the 'alleged relationship.' She referenced the article we're all referencing (I don't think she herself asked them) and said that while she didn't believe their denial, they had stayed away from each other at TIFF.
>>240 damn he looks delicious there! Also that shirt...it definitely has one foot in the grave, that's for sure. Seen better days!
>>246 LOL! It's not THAT bad. It's just dating. But maybe work out a PR strategy that isn't a throwback to the 1980s? How about that THEO? Also EO probably forgot that even tho she dumped Boyd in Oct and started romancing TH then, the general public all thought the engagement was called off around Dec since the announcement was made in Jan. Let's see what new timeline they'll feed us if they come out as a couple.
