Thread to talk about the actor Tom Hiddleston
>>300 And what is your conclusion? As a British person with a reasonable amount of "research" (hee hee) I would say it's vv unlikely. But I am not sure we can see.
>>302 I saw this on torrilla a moment ago after a truly shitty day at work and I was instantly hearteyes again. He looks marvellous.
>>300 >>301 Yeah, aren't these the same sources that turned out to be catfishers - is that the term?
I 'researched' a total of 5 men during my time in England: 3 Brits, one Scot and an Italian. All of them were as God made them, full and intact. Religion - and I guess medical conditions - really seem to be the only reasons for circumcision.
>>303 I wrote it in the last thread, sometimes I hate him he's so well put together and proportioned. He's really very David-like.
And as thrilling as a quick look at his dinky is, I'm more than happy with those shoulders and chest.
>>304 The only circumcised partner I have had was Jewish.
I think many Americans (at least those who have not carried out "research" on our shores...) have a hard time understanding just how unpopular circumcision is in the UK. People keep saying on tumblr "but his parents were rich!" or "but he looks so clean!" as if you would only choose not to have your baby circumcised if you were filthy and living on the breadline!
>>305 I am happier looking at his twelve chest hairs and his wonky left nipple than I am peering at gifs for an out of focus shot of his willy. I must be very vanilla at heart.
https://twitter(.)com/twhiddleston/status/705382333830946816
He's totally try to tweet our attention away from 'Liddle Hiddles.'
>>306 It's becoming fairly uncommon on these shores as well. A lot of people used to get it done because they wanted sons to 'look like' their fathers (fathers from a generation when nearly everyone in the US was automatically circumcised). But I think people have realized that this becomes self-perpetuating/sustaining, so they've just stopped.
Got to love the reasoning of some people: Poor, dirty = you must be uncircumcised! That's a Ven diagram I've not seen!
>>308 Now he's retweeting all things HR! Boy's on a roll.
>>301>>304 I always thought he was uncut. Not sure if this is a joke...doesn't seem to be...a former schoolmate of th's came forward to confirm: http://gandering-gregory.tumblr.com/post/140422100148/hiddlestonluvr-hiddlestonluvr
>>309 A lot of American girls I met at college had been told that it was rilly, rilly hard to keep an uncut one clean, and were surprised to learn that they have fewer nooks and crannies than our own ladyparts, which nobody thinks are a bother to wash.
>>311 That guy and his wife are an interesting corner of the fandom. D/s and Hiddleston obsession. Would he really remember clearly the willy of a man he must have met 15 years ago?
It seems that I decided to check up on this board at interesting times in TH's fandom, lol. Hi, guys! It's been a while.
>>312 Unless it's a very impressive willy :) Or the guy was very interested in TH's willy at the time - which is nothing wrong with that! But even if he does remember, I'm sort of side-eyeing him for enjoying so much his 15 min in this tiny corner of the Internet known as TH's fandom.
On a different note, I remembered recently that TNM was supposed to air and watched the 1st episode so far, and though it was rather good! Better than Bond, still a bit too campy for my tastes, but really not bad! TBH, lately I am having trouble mustering up any enthusiasm re: TH, whether he's fighting bad guys, making breakfasts, or even swinging his naked willy (therefore my absence) but I think I'm still going to keep watching!
>>311 I'm not sure if I believe the guy. Not about Tom being uncut but about him knowing Tom in college. I'm pretty positive Tom is uncut, based simply on cultural norms of UK. But not sure I believe the guy about going to school with TH. It's possible he might have but I'm always wary of people who pop up on tumblr with claims of having some sort of personal connection with Tom. Or any famous celebrity for that matter tbh.
>>314 England's a small place and the prevalence of Old Etonians and Oxbridge grads makes it feel smaller if you move in those circles. For example: there is someone down the hall at work who is an OE who is about the same age. It's such a small school that they undoubtedly knew each other and he probably knows and is in touch with people who are his close friends.
But I agree that it seems a coincidence that someone who just happens to be married to the person who runs a very well known Hiddleston tumblr blog suddenly pops up and says this.
I'm late for work, but....QQQQQQAAAAAAAZZZZZZ! You've been missed.
>>317 Yes, welcome back! Just seen your post in my coffee break when I had a bit of time to peruse the board properly as opposed to looking at the last post only. I hope that a peek at Liddle Hiddles revives your esteem for the great man!!!
>>317 And I've missed you guys!
>>318 Same here, I had a free moment, read a few of the last posts and was back to my work stuff again.
Hey, don't get me wrong, I still like the great man and still think he's talented and handsome! It's only that I don't get so excited about him for some reason. (Well ok, I know the reason, but it's irrelevant to the topic and real life related. It's not him, it's me!)
But still, that fleeting peek? He should really try harder to lure back such a valuable fan as myself :) Until then, I'm counting on HR to get me back on the Hiddles-wagon.
Anyway, I've been catching up on the posts, and although I'm clearly late to the party, but
>>263 I don't know what it is, but Anon, I'm laughing at that image so hard :D Literally to tears, for about 20 minutes now :D
>>261 I hear you, Anon., I mean it totally wasn't weird that at some point I considered photoshopping him into all my photos, wedding included. Granted, he would have looked awkward in them, being shirtless and all, but it wasn't like I was after the plausible photographic composition anyway.
On a (more or less) serious note - they are charging $500??? No way, not even at the peak of my infatuation with him. Plus, I agree - super awkward.
>>319 Come with us to the cafe! Pick the name of your favourite tumblr nutcase for your tshirt (so many choices!) or maybe have one with a stupid question you'd like to ask him.
Or we could each dress up as one of his ex girlfriends.
>>320 I was hoping you'd invite me!
Yeah, so many choices.. But I doubt he knows any of them by (nick)names, so I think I'll just brighten his day by confessing I came all the way from LT to ask him about that mole he has and what influence it had on his acting career. After all, I'm all about his art nowadays!
Meanwhile, I checked again for any news about HR screening in LT and there are still none. We have this spring film festival and I had a tiny hope that maybe it would be in the programme, but nothing so far. I'm starting to doubt that I'll get a chance to see it on the big screen at all :(
>>321 That is a real pain. Only on the big screen will we be able to see Tom and Little Tom in their full but fleeting glory.
>>320 Has any taken SF? I can look perky but annoyed.
>>324 You can have who you like! Though I am sure Anon. would fight you to be the JArthy!!!!!
Personally I think SF is the best one because he'd put his hand up your skirt and snog you in public.
>>311 I would like to state for the record that I have always been a faithful defendant of Liddle Hiddles (now his official nickname).
When the door sex tweets appeared, I refused to believe that two minutes was all the puff Liddle Hiddles had in him - remember?
So, even though the HR peek suggests a situation WNL, I'm going to believe the tumblr guy! Behold the uncut majesty of Liddle Hiddles!
>>313 I think we're all enjoying TNM but have some sticking points like you - not least of all the brevity of the love scenes and the fact that his ass shot was filmed by a potato located on Mars.
This TH (and Liddle Hiddles) when they find out qaz doesn't love them anymore. ;)
>>319 Yeah, $500 and they sold out! Guess it will have to be the cafe hen party.
>>324 She totally had that look down. There's some TIFF behind the scenes footage where she's just waiting around for him. And while she looks happy enough, there's just something behind the eyes that suggests she's peeved.
>>325 I'm probably closest to EO in terms of size and coloring - though I don't have a face like a plate. But no one would be allowed to dress up as the holy one - sacrilege! We'd end up fighting over who had to be Sian.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BCi7JTAury6/
From the Sunday Times. All painted with trouser legs rolled up...with Bond in his sights.
Here's to a decent interview! I feel like we haven't had one in awhile.
>>323 Of course he has 90 minute Skype sessions. Of course.
He said he was 'making a documentary' about S. Sudan. Perhaps we'll see that product eventually.
Oh, no, he's swinging the truth and authenticity hammer pretty hard again.
>>328 I saw today on Tumblr some fan who bought a ticket saying that it's a photo op with TH + Chris Hemsworth, presumably together? I don't know how those things work. So at least he'll probably get to share possible awkward moments with his 'brother from another mother'.
I keep forgetting Sian! When Anon suggested, I thought to myself that I don't look like any of his ex-GFs at all, but I was humouring myself for a moment that if I tried really hard, maybe I could pass for a less glamorous Kat Dennings (like A LOT less glamorous). But now I realise with horror that I would probably be Sian!
P.S. My capthcha says 'jairthly'! I swear! Only two letters off. Are you hinting something, captcha? No, I wouldn't dare!
>>326 But here we are talking about dimensions. Then we were talking about duration....I have never doubted the humongous size of the Buckingham Phallus (as flappyhappyhiddles calls it).
There is worse than Sian. If we are getting into dressing up not just as girlfriends but as female companions, SOMEONE HAS TO BE LARA PULVER.
>>330 I glazed over a bit before I got to that para first time around. On rereading I see what you mean. Rather a more nuanced view on diversity and the arts (yawn - why is he expected to have the answers to this?). He was crucified in CB over the Guardian interview for living in his ivory tower (I paraphrase) but this interview was done at more or less the same time and probably not in "response" to criticisms of the Guardian piece. It suggests as we remarked at the time that the fault lay in the interviewer - or how she edited his response.
Sight and Sound has the longest interview ever. Torrilla has the screencaps. I think it was completed by an heir after the original interviewer died during his response about how he prepped by reading Ballard.
>>335 "it was completed by an heir after the original interviewer died during his response about how he prepped by reading Ballard" LOL! Your comment deserves an Oscar for Best Original Wit EVER! Superior comment ever!
>>331 Holy Captcha! It has 'air' in it because she floats on air like an angel - a fag smoking, ombre'd, foul-mouthed angel. And it's an adverb because she's all about the ACTION!
>>332 Don't matter. I believe in the holistic power of Liddle Hiddles. It can bring peace to the Middle East. It can defeat Trump for the Republican nomination. Tiny Tim don't need no crutch - he can use TH's dick. ;)
>>333 And Oompa-loompa LP at that.
>>337 If Liddle Hiddles is a bigger dick than Donald Trump then it must be vast indeed.
>>336 Mwah! But I feel I have to bring my A game to hang out with you lot.
I don't know about duration, but Lil' Hiddles is not so little : http://lokislittlediva.tumblr.com/post/140357485840/quoting-shakespeare-to-ducks-hiddlesbiscuit. We don't see it all in that High-Rise peak.
>>334 Indeed. That's the best interview of him we've had in a while imo.
>>340 The best bit from that link is the comment by the little old lady.
After Tom's mention of UKIP in the Sight & Sound interview I read a thousand Wikipedia articles on UK politics but I still feel a little lost. Can someone give an American a brief explanation of the major political parties?
>>342 Ok I will try. No guarantee that other Brits on here will quite agree but here goes.
UKIP - usually accepted to be most far right party. Wants end to participation in EU, end to immigration (often thought to be appealing to covertly or openly racist views though they deny this), end to Human Rights Act, repeal of equal rights legislation for women, POC, disabled etc, support for broadening gun laws. Large popular support when counted nationwide but one MP due to vagaries of political system (votes split across hundreds of MP elections so almost no wins. I mention them first but they are regarded as a marginal party - extreme views, some grassroots support (like DT but much less successful in the event).
Conservative - very broadly equivalent to Republican. But a lot less right wing. For example: No support for repealing abortion laws. No support for broadening gun laws and indeed legislated against handgun ownership in the 80s. Supports and brought in legislation for gay marriage in last Parliament.
Labour - very broadly equivalent to Democratic Party. But a lot more left wing eg some want to end nuclear deterrent and in the 70s there was 99% tax for highest earners. Bernie Saunders would be moderate in the Labour Party. New leader after a fairly crushing defeat in the last election when it was widely predicted they would win. He is called Jeremy Corbyn - little political experience as a front bencher (ie holding a shadow cabinet post). Another expression of grassroots discontent, from the other end of the policitcal spectrum - he is not widely supported by other Labour MPs.
Liberal Democrats - hard to place. Theoretically liberals would be between labour and conservative historically. The party originated in the 19th century as an alternative to Tories (conservative) and Whig (not equivalent to labour but more left wing). Recently it tried to position itself to the left of Labour. Was decimated in the last election and now only has 9 MPs. Ironically UKIP got more votes I think.
Broadly speaking we have a similar structure but it is all shifted to the left.We had a couple of Communist MPs during WW2. There is a great Monty Python sketch explaining the US system to the British whic says "The Republican Party: this is equivalent to the Conservative Party. The Democratic Party: this is equivalent to the Conservative Party."
>>342 PS we vote for our MPs as you vote for egg senators - you vote for one candidate for that state (or constituency over here) and your vote only counts for that particular race. We call it first past the post. There is no transferable vote and it doesn't go to a national total of who got most overall. The difference is there is no separate race for PM - the post is filled by the party that gets most MPs. When we talk about a hung Parliament we mean that there aren't enough of one party's MPs to win a vote. We don't get a democrat President, a Republican Congress situation.
Some people have complained that his means parties with a lot of votes nationally (chiefly the Lib Dems) lose out on this system. The significant upside to my mind is that parties like UKIP don't get many seats. There are disadvantages with both systems.
egg senators? Maybe I should boycott Apple ;)
Bringing this back on topic, TH lurves Corbyn, I think. Cf this Guardian interview (though he refuses to say how he votes). http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/08/tom-hiddleston-interview-crimson-peak
PS this is one of my favourite interviews because I think it gives a sense of what he is like as a person. For example that he smokes - but like the Queen, is never photographed doing so. That said a lot to me about how he seeks to control his image.
Longtime lurker here. While this political discourse is fascinating, I feel the need to redress the balance with some smut. This image was miraculously overlooked in the excitement of the blurry flash of Little Hiddles. Thanks to a tight climbing harness, Little Hiddles is rather prominent and appears to be of a short and fat nature, generously padded by unfeasibly large balls. A big shout out to the climbing harness for leaving nothing to the imagination and a pang of jealousy towards the lucky person who strapped him in.
>>347 Was there meant to be a link? I am not sure I have seen a pic of TH in a climbing harness - let alone one that is tight about the bollocks...!
>>347 And welcome! We like our political and other discourse with a large side of smut. All tastes catered to.
>>347 Casualty? TH is so rarely in a harness...in public.
>>347 Hi, Anonon!
>>348 I think it's the link in the Anonon's name.
This image, right?
http://postimg.org/image/haw1vad0h/
He has large feet :) Especially by contrast to the girl near him.
I used that link feature once and it wouldn't let me post! And it wasn't a Twitter link. What special margin does new Anonon have?
Welcome, magical one!
And QQQQAAAAZZZZZZ - I'm going to do it every time.
>>347 'unfeasibly large balls' was born out by my 'research' in the UK. Anon, what was your data like? What's in the water over there?
>>354 'Did you hear that?' - I asked my cat just now. 'I think someone's calling my name! It's probably Anon.! I should go right away!'
But, um.. You shouldn't do it every time :) I feel undeserving, with my disappearances and all.
>>357 Nope. You've become like Norm in Cheers. Your appearance will earn a shout - just maybe not with so many letters (pain in the ass keystroke wise).
>>356 No, you were actually using the link box for its intended purpose.
Forget TH's balls, I want to hear the story about the creepy old man! TH will probably become a creepy old man at some point; he's not shy with his reconnoitering of females, and once a person has that, it's only a matter of age before he hits creepy old man level.
>>346 I wonder if TH has ever really tried to hide any of his 'true self' - ugh, I hate phrases like that - or if we, the general public, just haven't seen it because of editorial choices (not TH choices). If he didn't want us to know about his smoking, he wouldn't have mentioned it in this interview. And we only have it because the author decided to put it in the piece. TH might have smoked his way through every single print interview since year dot, but journalists, editors, etc. haven't mentioned it - and not necessarily because he hasn't told them not to mention it.
When I saw this photo from the ES awards, I realized he was a smoker: everyone's outside in the very cold weather (classic enforced outside smoke break), HMc has got a cig, the people behind them have got cigs. TH has very likely got one in his right hand - he isn't hiding it and doesn't seem bothered to have a pic being taken of him - but the photographer has either shot it without TH's cig or made that edit afterwards. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B5JlrcLIQAAiSM2.jpg
And since JA and EO are of the chimney variety, it seemed logical that he would be as well; non-smokers so rarely take up with smokers.
As for his Corbyn love - that wouldn't surprise me. I would imagine that he might be an economic conservative and social liberal. His production company - which doesn't produce anything as yet - may be a little dance he's having with HMRC.
But he certainly talks the talk of a liberal in regards to social issues. He probably also loves Corbyn because they have the same number of non-suit clothing items.
A string of new ISTL pics on twitter and IG from the film's site.
http://sonyclassics.com/isawthelight/
I know I'm in the very small minority, but I'm looking forward to it. By all accounts, it's going to be a mess of a plot, and I'll probably be thinking are they, aren't they? as I watch the two leads interact, but if I made it through OLLA - where NOTHING happened by the way and there was pretty dubious dialogue - and still appreciate TH's performance, I can make it through this.
>>360 I think that is the only photo I have ever seen where he might have been smoking. It was taken during ISTL so it makes sense if he was smoking a lot for filming and then struggling to give up, as he said in the interview. He has been depicted many times in cafes and on the street by fans and occasionally paps and I have never seen him smoking. That's what I mean about being careful. Someone smoking is order mentioned by journos as "local colour" so I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't smoke during interviews. Saying you smoked a bit for a role and have tried to give up feels a bit different. I think it's a fib FWIW and that he has smoked on and off throughout his adult life - he has the classic smokers' lines between the eyes and from the nose to the mouth.
>>360 As to his politics - I have long wondered whether he votes with his wallet. The proposals for mansion tax, had Labour been elected, would have cost him about £40k a year if Zoopla's valuation of his home is correct. And that's before any other tax increases. There are plenty of Tories who are socially liberal and economically conservative (low tax, low regulation, lots of incentives to grow business) - one stereotype, of whom I have met plenty, is the gay London Tory. Socially liberal with stacks of cash.
As for the business, yes that is a form of legal tax avoidance. They way it works is this: offer your services as actor as an employee through your company. Company pays you as sole shareholder a dividend on which you pay income tax. If you have a good year you may choose to pay only part of your earnings/the company's profit as dividend and leave the rest in your company, where you pay corporation tax but at a lower rate than personal income tax. If you have a lean year coming you drip out a dividend that year, smoothing your income and potentially keeping yourself in a lower tax band both years.
This is how almost all actors offer their services. It isn't bent but it is a bit rich when many of them are railing at the evils of tax avoidance by Starbucks (eg Amanda Abigdon of Sherlock fame - who not only ran her affairs through a company but also tried to bankrupt herself to avoid paying a large tax bill until she got rumbled by the press).
>>355 I've saved my "large balls" comment for late at night. Yes, I think it is a thing over here. I have no idea why. Also pendulous ones for some reason. Which our boy has. That much was very clear from the High Rise gif - though it is not as if we needed it after 4000 times when he has had to stow them down his trouser leg.
Before TH goes all cloak and dagger bad boy, let's flashback to a time when he was a curly haired goofball who wore really bad sweaters.
https://www.instagram.com/p/BCnpde1KCJo/
Awwwww.
>>343 >>344 Thank you SO much, Anon!
>>347 I'm fascinated by the male anatomy. How does one even walk with something dangling there, especially when it's as significant in size as Tom's? Doesn't it get in the way? When stowing it down one pant leg or the other, does it feel lopsided? The one time I asked a man these questions he just sort of shrugged and looked at me like I was crazy. Maybe they just don't really notice since they've always had to deal with it?
>>367 And it sometimes moves without you wanting it to.
I just asked my husband about the lopsided down one leg thing. He says: of course it feels lopsided. But it is only an issue if you wear very tight trousers. Otherwise (and I quote) the balls sit one either side of the seam. I am told that it is monstrously uncomfortable to wear tight trousers if you are well hung. This probably explains why John Hamm almost always wears slacks.
PS my (off topic) pleasure about the political stuff!
>>347 Welcome Anonon!
>>360 I'm going for the latter. I think his true self is 'normal.' If he weren't in an attention gathering career, he'd be like any other well-off, 35 year old bachelor. He's pretty discreet about relationships - that's probably the extent to which he hides anything.
>>361 I'm trying to muster enthusiasm for ISTL. If looking for signs of chemistry between THEO will help me pay attention, then so be it. Otherwise, I'm just in it to see his performance and wonder at what point he realized that the direction and editing was a clunker.
>>368 You'd think that pushing them together with briefs or boxer briefs while wearing loose slacks would help but I guess any restraint is uncomfortable at that (?!) size. Kind of like we large-busted ladies and bras - worse if ill-fitting. Then if they're in one tight area, they get sweaty and wwwww… schwety balls, man.
>>361 I'm wondering if his clunkerdar is broken. I work in the film industry have read many a bad script. It's screechingly obvious from the onset that nothing can save them. ISTL seems to have suffered from Abrahams' megalomania: script writer/ director/ producer. I wouldn't be surprised if he interfered with the editing. Only a genius can pull that off.
>>368 How do pendulous gonads jog in loose shorts? As a large busted lady I have to double- bra. Do they double- brief?
I meant >>369
Too many 14hr days in a row. Pass the wine please
Number of 'Worst Birthday Ever' parties: 1
Number of 'Worst Farmer Tan Ever' shirtless running scenes: 1 (he did look better in motion than in those stills)
Number of shirtless swimming scenes: 1 (so lovely!)
Number of times TH carried a child on his shoulders and my uterus ached: 1
Number of close ups of TH's eye: 0 (I was surprised!)
Number of times TH said 'Close the door' and my panties flew across the room: 1
Number of sex scenes: 0 (I think - they're so short, I might have missed it)
Number of bum shots: 1 (not TH)
Number of episodes where TH's hair was on-point: 1 (it was perfect)
TH: A (expression, delivery, you name it, boy was hitting it out of the park)
HL: A
OC: A (her scene in the church was pitch perfect)
THo: A
>>369 No one can resist TH's Schweddy Balls - they're salty and mouthwatering. (Classic SNL!)
>>370 The Ball Bra - a product of Croatia (NSFW)!
http://mixarticles.krpmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/ballbra.jpg
>>370 or a jock strap (lots of line drawings incl one of a fur(!) jock strap. Is this NSFW? I dunno). http://m.wikihow.com/Wear-a-Jockstrap
As Anon. has previously wisely remarked, TH wouldn't be the first actor to read a shit script and think "I save eet wiz my genios."
>>372 I haven't seen it yet, but I am beginning to feel like a man (even without all this chat about pendulous balls). Every week one settles down with one's favourite cable show/goes to see a new movie, secure in the knowledge that a character of the opposite sex will totally gratuitously get their kit off.
>>370 There's a gif of TH jogging while freeballing it in Suburban Shootout that may answer your question (right before Ruth falls down): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULAj19fbSpE
>>373 *Schweddy. I was thinking of Alec Baldwin's face as I was mistyping it in >>369.
>>374 This looks more comfortable than a conventional jock strap due to the open space between the waistband and the cup. My friend wears one in lieu of briefs.
>>375 Hah! That How-To wear a jock page had a Bora-Bora Travel ad at the bottom
So what are we calling this latest thing (the HR unintentional crotch shot): Cockgate? Turtlegate?
We can't call it the Moneyshot, as I hear that's later in the movie.
>>380 I don't think you'd catch an Englishman referring to his membrum virile as a turtle. I'd say willygate...
>>375 This is totally SFW. I made mine NSFW because there's just a hint of cock in one of the pics.
I want to get my man a fur jock strap - so luxurious and useful!
TH probs already has a ball bra and a fur jock...sent by fans.
>>379 I'm so bad with picking up accents that I'm too trusting with them. You say you're playing an America? Okay, you must then have an American accent - I believe you and your strange vowels!
>>377 I think the spelling can go both ways. There was a bakery/candy store on the UWS that used to sell Schweddy balls! This was a few years ago. You'd buy a few and then - in your best NPR radio voice - do the hit quotes from the skit: My mouth's watering thinking about your balls, I can't wait to get my mouth around these balls, no one can resist my Schweddy balls, etc.
So puerile, so funny.
https://twitter(.)com/HughLaurious/status/706925622174597121
TH and HL TimesTalk.
Ummm, I kinda just bought tickets.
http://timestalks.com/buytickets.php
Here's the link for other NYCers.
I'm soooo excited. This is MY opportunity to ask TH MY question about MY favorite movie of his: The Pirate Fairy.
Hugh Laurie better not ruin MY opportunity.
I'm also going to ask for a hug. It's MY only chance to touch TH!
(Watch out that you don't slip in that pool of sarcasm.)
>>390 Make sure you hold a purse in front of your face, maybe you'll catch his eye! It's not too late to be FWB Dumpee of the Year 2016!
>>391 I'm a lady, so I'm pretty much going to act like the Queen would in this situation. I'm going to wear a mini-skirt, a tube top that has the words 'I'm a Hiddlestoner Slut' written out in rhinestones and 4 inch stiletto heels. Classy outfit for a classy lady.
At an appropriate time - 'appropriate' being the key word - I'll throw my apartment keys at TH's face and shout, 'Come and get it, big boy.'
If that doesn't work, then I'll hold a purse in front of my face, whine "Tom, Tom, where are you?' and lure him into a waiting taxi.
A Plan A and B - how could it go wrong?
https://twitter(.)com/ACMawards/status/706957920370446336
TH as HW, courtesy of ACM Awards. I'm sure they'll do tie-ins with country radio stations and the like, so maybe a tie in with these awards is on the cards. THEO presenting? Oh, Lord, no. THEO presenting Cheaters of the Year? Oh, Lord, yes!
TH could surely use a fur jock strap. He has so leetle fur of his own. Maybe he has one and that accounts for the padded appearance of his groin area.
>>390 I am ridiculously excited for you about the q&a! Imagine me doing that dance that Snoopy always did in the Peanuts cartoons!!! Will you ask him about the jock strap for me?
Tom tweets himself playing his gee-tar and singing. For some reason I find this clip wildly embarrassing: https://mobile.twitter(.)com/twhiddleston/status/707453297981071360
>>397 The ACM awards posted it first >>393, but he followed up. Perhaps adding to the possibility of a tie-in with the awards? How else would they have come upon it if not through SPC or RC (who would ask permission before sharing with ACM, surely)?
I know jack squat about these awards; do they have a movie soundtrack category? Could ISTL actually win an award?
The week between TNM episodes is so long. We need another dick flash or nipple shot or Purse-Gate.
Anything!
Anon, have you seen HR yet? You're going to a screening, aren't you? Make sure you do a complete run down (on the Tim Hoddleston thread if necessary for spoilers) once you've seen it.
