Tom Hiddleston 7 (1000)

1 Name: Anon : 2016-02-19 08:08 ID:gDkQNPan

Thread to talk about the actor Tom Hiddleston

951 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 14:09 ID:qAvx5iXW

>>950 I am guessing it was either a group interview and we are getting a second version of the same answers (not very well transcribed. Something about this makes me think it was transcribed by a non English speaker. Sounds too curt to be him, apart from anything else. And the idiom sounds wrong). Or, it was one interview which has been sold to lots of people and cut down by them.

952 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 14:14 ID:qAvx5iXW

>>949 I cannot believe the stylist is owning this outfit. I am sure she helped him to buy the items but the combo is not good (blue fancy suit jacket with black jeans, grey boots and different blue shirt - fairly uncoordinated if you ask me). It looks like what I suspect it is - TH opens suitcase and selects one shirt, one pair trousers, one jacket, one pair shoes and puts them all on. Or do we now believe she appears at his bedside every day and lays out his clothes? (shades of Louis XIV)

953 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-03 14:17 ID:3y0V+yNh

>>946 QAZZZZ! I wouldn't think ISTL would show up on the radar in LT. It's a strange one - it's playing in a few places in Queens and Brooklyn, but only one place in Manhattan. Does Sony think Queens and Brooklyn are filled with country music fans?

How's it looking for HR in your parts - cinema wise?

OT: I listened to the TH Josh Horowitz podcast...and then listened to the Domhnall Gleeson one...heart-eyes. He's such a cutie-patootie.

954 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-03 14:20 ID:3y0V+yNh

>>952 Is she really owning it? I was making a joke about the 30 minute convo. I hope he also has someone putting toothpaste on the brush and flossing for him...he must be groomed properly!

955 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 14:23 ID:qAvx5iXW

>>954 According to her Twitter she styled him for Variety! Actually all joking aside I think she is reaching - what she means is "I chose these items for him".

956 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 18:41 ID:qAvx5iXW


Inside Reel i'vue:

Bay Area i'vue with Luke the Drifter impression and a fat guy in a hat who is the only person other than TH to think this film is any good:

Foxx411 i'vue:

Bit of BAFTA NY:

Wonderwall i'vue:

Apparently there is a shower scene in ISTL so it may not be unmitigated lay bad:

Tom cuddles a ketchup bottle, not very successfully:

Tom and the boots - video giving rise to gifs:

Some unspeakably bad singing:

More unspeakably bad singing (the girl recording it has a better voice!):

CCTV News:


The Verge: it's not for fame, it's all about the Werk (good i'vue though):

San Antonio Current:

Esquire - but where is the soggy suit photo?


957 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 18:43 ID:qAvx5iXW

I now know more about Hank Williams, and about regional US news outlets, than I thought possible.

958 Name: qaz : 2016-04-03 19:04 ID:0nSbDl0M

>>947 >>953 Hi Anon and Anon.!! :)

>>953 HR is released in our theatres at the end of April, so my worries were premature it seems, yay!

959 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 19:33 ID:qAvx5iXW

>>958 That is SUCH good news. It is a great movie.

I now feel I have heard and read so much about ISTL that if it is ever released in the UK I ought to go and see it, just to express my admiration for TH's efforts in the publicity department. He said on Radio 2 that he hoped it would be released in the UK in May. He will be resting before starting to film TR so I have hopes he will attend 200 or so screenings here....

960 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-03 20:49 ID:3y0V+yNh

>>951 That must be it - or something along those lines.

>>956 >>957 It's a large country with lots of local news/entertainment outlets, and they all want their pound of flesh. Sony hasn't gone in for half measures, that's for sure.

>>956 The Verge article: the The Work argument doesn't fly very far, not with his expanded 'team.' Having a groomer and paying someone to pick out your socks doesn't scream 'Work.' It points to someone who very much wants to influence people's opinions. Which is fine - being an actor means playing the fame game. But don't be all 'I'm above that' about it. And, if this is some way to passively protect his private life, why be passive about it? If someone asks him about his private life, he shouldn't give them the 'it's really about the work' spiel, he should tell them that his private life is private and he's not going to talk about it. Why he seems incapable of this direct approach baffles me.

I'm going to the 10:00pm showing of ISTL - late enough? It will just be me and the dodgy TH/EO fans in raincoats. I'll give a spoiler-free review on Monday.

961 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 21:07 ID:qAvx5iXW

>>960 Is there anyone in the solar system who doesn't know what happens to Hank at the end of the movie?

I also want your review of ep6 of TNM!

962 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 21:24 ID:qAvx5iXW

>>960 I thought the remark was maybe about all those terrible reviews for ISTL - which nobody has dared ask him about, I notice. You pick your projects, you do the work and you don't pay attention to people's opinions.

I can respect him for not running away screaming "it's shit and it's not my fault!" Lots of actors get embarrassed about publicising something once it's become clear it is a critical flop, and I find that really unattractive.

Equally it's fine to realise that you get the odd spot and, if left alone, dress like a homeless person, and want to do something about those things. I suppose most actors use stylists and makeup artists to some degree. But the sudden explosion of Team Tom says to me he wants that fame thang real bad right now. So his comments come off badly.

He doesn't really do things by halves does he? It makes me think of the Thor 2 tour - he had a makeup person and Olly and I think someone else travelling with him then, and he was just as mad - turning up to the opening of an envelope all across SE Asia. Yet at SDCC last year he was wearing his own "creations". Maybe he embraces all this only to the extent that the studio pays for his entourage?

963 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-03 21:26 ID:Ep2jQcLc

>>961 I haven't watched it yet! I got wrapped up with Easter: two church services (he's not Catholic and always wants to keep up the Protestant side!) and then Easter lunch with friends followed by Easter dinner with family. I read the DM's account, so I know what happens. I'll do it tomorrow after work. I'll use it as a palate cleanser after ISTL!

964 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-03 21:40 ID:Ep2jQcLc

>>962 I will always connect The Work to The Personal Life because it first popped up a few days after Pap Night. Remember the Facebook post: how grateful he was for The Work and that people enjoyed The Work. Read: Ignore that I have a FWB, ignore that she hates photographers but loves gates, ignore that we may be leveraging this relationship for the film's benefit.

But I can see it perhaps being about shit reviews. I think it's just good manners that interviewers don't disparage the product. That or playing nice with studios to maintain future access. I can see No-name online magazine maybe not getting a press pass for another Sony movie if they mention how crap ISTL is.

965 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 21:54 ID:qAvx5iXW

>>964 I wouldn't expect anyone to sit down and say "I saw ISTL and it was dire." But I wondered if someone might ask "do you read reviews? how do you deal with bad reviews?"

966 Name: Anon : 2016-04-03 23:43 ID:qAvx5iXW

967 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-04-04 00:58 ID:89pEWkso

>>966 Hope there aren't any rude Hank 3 fans in the audience.

Tom won UK National Film Academy award for High Rise - Best Actor. Sign of good things to come, I hope.

968 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-04-04 05:58 ID:89pEWkso

969 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-04-04 06:19 ID:89pEWkso

Quick review of ISTL. The opening scene of Tom signing was the highlight of the movie; it was drastically better than when we first saw that Wheatland video. All the actors did well. Cherry was excellent. The common review highlight about the editing and leaving out key chunks of his life - true. The Luke the Drifter persona was creepy.

970 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-04 16:36 ID:Ep2jQcLc

>>969 I don't know what my best part of it was. I can't even say TH because of the writing.

There were five people in the theatre (one couple, two singles an Yes, it was 10:00 on a Sunday night, but five is still piss-poor for any movie in NYC - no matter day or time. The place itself was fairly busy with only a few empty tables in the cafe and couches in the lounge.

Here's the rundown (SPOILERS - not really). Hank Williams: got married, loved his wife, had a baby, sang some songs, fell in love with a garage door, fought with his wife, did the dirty on his wife, used his hat as an accountant, drank, divorced his wife, got a second wife, had some back pain, died.

Editing - Everything was just chopped up like mince. There's no continuity. A scene would fade out and I'd be left thinking 'What did I get from that? How does this fit in with the story?' And then it would jump to a completely new, unrelated scene without any context from the previous one/s. The faux interviews and home movies don't really pull the story together - if they were even meant to. It's just a composite of scenes with no transition. This is worse at the start and gets better mid-movie.

Writing - God Almighty! I was cringing at nearly every section of dialogue. People didn't speak like that in the 1940/50s - people don't speak like that today. And surprise, surprise, the dialogue has no transition/flow - just like the editing. It jumps all over the place too.

Weather - Watch what MA does with weather and the story. It's a little hokey, but it's one of the few things that actually adds some depth to the movie.

Pace: Weird. So slow mostly (two hours seems like three). There are parts with momentum, but mostly it just drags.

Performances: THEO work with what they've got. Those of you who have trouble with the're not going to make it! Both TH and EO's voices started to drive me crazy at around the one hour mark. The crap dialogue doesn't help. They do have chemistry in that you believe the romantic parts and you believe their fights. Their performances are so heartfelt, you can tell they both pulled out all the stops acting wise and are just as let down by the script/editing as the audience. Despite her annoying character, at the end I felt more for Audrey than Hank - he didn't do right by her! TH may have sympathy for HW, but I didn't. TH's singing was very good as Whats said. They should have anchored the story around the songs/stage performances more.

Overall: To paraphrase the announcer at the end, 'This is the hardest thing I've ever had to just wasted 15 bucks, 3 mini bottles of Chardonnay and two hours of your life on this movie.'

971 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-04 16:46 ID:Ep2jQcLc


I want to know what prompted this face! Maybe Whats is psychic and there were Hank III fans on the RC!

Or maybe this is the moment he realizes that he's at a country awards show to promote a craptastic movie.

972 Name: Anon : 2016-04-04 16:50 ID:qAvx5iXW

>>970 No, but tell us how you really felt.

Sob. What a waste of a good cast and a great life story/music.

None of this surprises me. Whenever MA has been able to wrest the mic away from TH (and apparently at the SF q&a, TH quite literally tried to snatch it off him!) he has said three things. First, he has no idea why HW was a musical genius. Second, he wanted to step away from the tried and tested magic of chronological storytelling. Third, that he was more interested in the man than the music. It seems that when you combine these three factors, what you end up with is anecdote soup.

And TH doesn't even look cute in the pics I have seen. It's out in the UK on 6 May. I need to steel myself to be a good fangirl.

973 Name: Anon : 2016-04-04 16:53 ID:qAvx5iXW


Thinks: "I am sitting 10 rows behind Keith Urban and Nicole."

Or: "I stared at Dolly's beasts and she stamped on my foot."

974 Name: Anon : 2016-04-04 16:54 ID:qAvx5iXW

Breasts!! Not that you need this clarification given the context.

975 Name: Anon : 2016-04-04 17:06 ID:qAvx5iXW

Speaking of TH wresting the mic from MA, take a look at the link I posted yesterday to the Bay Area interview. It is unintentionally hilarious - TH looks bored and resentful every time MA talks (maybe he has now realised that MA can't direct and that everyone is calling the movie I Saw the Shite). Then at 5.30 he loses the will to live and starts flirting with the camera!

976 Name: Anon : 2016-04-04 20:23 ID:qAvx5iXW

He looks strangely young here - I thought it was from Thor times but it is from filming ISTL:

977 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-05 02:38 ID:YhVcERsm

>>972 I feel as if I've done my duty - I even bought the ticket for ISTL, I didn't fudge by buying a ticket for another movie.

>>973 Funny you should mention that. Someone on twitter spotted him in the crowd and said he was sitting with the D-Listers! So ten rows behind Keith and Nic sounds right. I don't even think he got close to Dolly's Double-Ds!

978 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-05 02:41 ID:YhVcERsm

https://twitter(.)com/BAFTALA/status/717064057543479296 Seems he's back in LA.

Has he crossed the country twice in two weeks? Is that right, I can't remember. Either way, he'll do it again as he's due in NYC next week for TimesTalk and Tribeca.

979 Name: anonsy : 2016-04-05 03:13 ID:V6C+Feoq

>>978 And then he'll be back on the east coast in a week for more Night Manager promo, right? He's going to need a week to sleep off the jet lag when this is over.

980 Name: anonsy : 2016-04-05 03:14 ID:V6C+Feoq

>>978 Oh, you've already said what I just said. That's what I get for posting while drinking. :P :P :P

981 Name: Whatsinaname : 2016-04-05 05:03 ID:89pEWkso

>>973 They are beasts. :) Poor guy - who signed him up for that show? Bad decision. I fear it was made months ago, before the poor reception at TIFF.

>>970 yes, the writing could have been better - I'm being very generous here - especially when Luke the Drifter made an appearance. That was cringe-worthy. The people next to me laughed.

982 Name: Anon : 2016-04-05 05:51 ID:qAvx5iXW

A new pic from the Sudan trip last year: https://twitter(.)com/_val83_/status/717207999966744578

983 Name: Anon : 2016-04-05 09:41 ID:qAvx5iXW

>>977>>981 Torrilla had a gif of Keith and Nicole clapping, with TH a little bespectacled blot on the horizon - looking more than a bit uncomfortable.

Unfortunately, I suspect this was a relatively recently booked gig. Before TIFF the plan was for the movie to be released in September, all the publicity done at that time, with hopes of Oscar nominations this February. Back in July/August last year there would be no perceived need to book TH to appear at an awards ceremony in April, way after the movie had been released and all the acting awards ceremonies were done and dusted. My guess is that this was booked more recently as part of the March/April publicity tsunami. No get out for it being a bad decision!

984 Name: Anon : 2016-04-05 09:55 ID:qAvx5iXW

I felt a bit sorry for him. There were pics of him milling around on the RC with all the other country d listers looking a bit lost. They also interviewed him and asked who he most wanted to see perform, and he had obviously got no idea! It must be pretty grim to attend a 3h award ceremony for music you know nothing about on your own, and have to make polite chat with people who don't know who you are, or who think your project sucked. It must be a lonely life at times. I'm not sure he's the type to fill his hotel room with Las Vegas hookers (looking at you, Prince Harry!).

OT: Nicole got the idiom right - she was rocking a 40-year old ex Southern belle Steel Magnolia meets gothic bride look. Sequins and a lot of net. Not at all her Oscar RC look!

985 Name: Anon : 2016-04-05 10:15 ID:qAvx5iXW

Is he having a pants on fire moment here? I am sure he said Thor 3 was the end but here he is a touch more coy:

986 Name: Anon : 2016-04-05 10:18 ID:qAvx5iXW

Oh yes, he did: Thor 3 "will be my last time out of the gate."

He'd make a terrible as Anon. said.

987 Name: Anon : 2016-04-05 10:22 ID:qAvx5iXW

Politician. My typing on the mobile is so poor, sorry.

988 Name: Anonon : 2016-04-05 11:02 ID:U1b94mg2

>>984 With nearly 12M viewers in the only demographic possibly interested in paying see this turkey (dedicated fans aside- I admire your gumption), I'd say TH willingly threw himself on the grenade. I've never seen him break into such as sweat as when he presented the award. He was a hot mess.
It was the country music equivalent of Loki at Comic-Con; such a company man. Is it arse- sucking or desperate self promotion or is he really just too nice to say no?
>>985 That's some serious backpedaling. Oopsie

989 Name: Couch Potato : 2016-04-05 11:29 ID:n7AC7MTE

990 Name: Anon : 2016-04-05 12:40 ID:VhNAEDLk

>>989 It is interesting. Thank you for linking.

That tweet is easy to search for because of the misspelling of EO's name. It has either been deleted, or it is not the tweet referred to on here, and someone has manufactured it after reading about it here or at the bicycle (probably with a view to trolling for followers for manufactured gossip to come). I see that the blog was only created on 26.03....

Anon. actually saw the tweet. Maybe she can shed some light?

991 Name: anonsy : 2016-04-05 15:27 ID:V6C+Feoq

>>989 So the tweeter is a "bona fide LA resident who works in showbiz" but only recognized/mentioned EO and not Tom. EO must have been making out with Marc Abraham then. ;)

992 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-05 15:40 ID:YhVcERsm

>>983 Awwww. I bet he would have loved to be next to Nic. He could do his Ozzie accent for her.

>>983 I'm not going to cry for Argentina. He's got to play the promo game - even if it's a dirty one. He'll probably spin it in his usual overenthusiastic manner and look on it as money in the experience bank.

I hope he got a hooker...maybe she'll sell her story and we'll get all the goss! Or, maybe a Dolly, Katy and TH threesome. Yes! I don't even care that it probably didn't happen, I want Star and The Sun to fabricate it.

993 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-05 16:04 ID:YhVcERsm

>>990 That's the one I saw. If it's no longer there, then she erased it.

>>991 I love that the tumblr got the Latin right - no 'bone fide' which you usually see. Like a good investigator I checked her other tweets when I first saw this one. She does live in LA and seems to write for tv shows. If you think about it, she would probably recognize EO (maybe she's met/seen her at events, maybe they live in the same neighborhood) but recognizing TH is less likely. He's just not that well known, cf. seating for ACM awards!

>>990 Yeah, it seems late to the party, but maybe there's more THEO stuff coming, maybe THEOAnon's got an inside track. Maybe EO knows how to work tumblr!

And now you all know my researcher secret! A supervisor once said to me 'Look for the mistakes first. Those are always the most interesting.' Two of the EO Hawaii tweets that I saw came out of a tag with her name spelled incorrectly. The 'hiddlestone' tag also throws up something good now and then.

994 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-05 16:17 ID:YhVcERsm

This matches up with the twitter posts I saw about EO in Hawaii. I didn't see any IG posts but the tweets I saw were from times other than mid-November/laser tag weekend. I wonder if she has these too.

995 Name: Kate : 2016-04-05 18:20 ID:+nTuteQa


But the source is wrong - they met long before they started work on ISTL. So I call bullshit.

996 Name: Anon : 2016-04-05 18:33 ID:VjvKiEA1

>>994 >>995

The source doesn't say they met in 2014. The journalist does.

Anyway the point I think Anon is making is that the substantive part of the story - EO seen several times in Hawaii - and the blogger's comment are both consistent with what she saw on Twitter. Maybe the source is a complete fabrication and stumbled on the truth by accident, but there appears to be some independent evidence that the underlying facts are true.

997 Name: anonsy : 2016-04-05 18:53 ID:V6C+Feoq

>>993 I've been to her tumblr, and I really think she would have recognized Tom. It still doesn't prove anything either way, though.

>>994 We already know they don't "get together as much as possible" and it's pretty widespread on the internet at this point that EO was in Hawaii. I don't think this "source" has any more valid information than the "source" that said EO dumped TH to focus on her career, or the "source" that said TH dumped EO so he could sleep around during SI filming.

998 Name: Anon : 2016-04-05 19:47 ID:qAvx5iXW

999 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-05 20:26 ID:YhVcERsm

>>988 I think often 'meet' is Hollywood speak for 'worked together.' Sure, they actually met back in 2011, but that was a fairly brief, transitory meeting at an audition and if they only saw each other in passing - at events and the like - then working together on ISTL might be considered a proper meeting.

Either way, as Anon said, it's OK mag: the source may be correct buy the author did a shit job of background checking.

1000 Name: Anon. : 2016-04-05 20:35 ID:YhVcERsm

>>997 You've been to her tumblr or her twitter? It's easy enough to find her twitter now with the responses un-redacted. THEOANon needs to do a better job of protecting her sources.

I can't say if she'd recognize TH. As I recall, she seemed very TV focused, so not recognizing TH wouldn't be unlikely. Maybe she even got the EO sighting wrong - who's to say?

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.