I'm a slob.
Previously:
#1 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1213916710/
#2 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1250275007/
#3 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1292544745/
#4 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1315193920/
#5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1326391378/
#6 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1333279425/
#7 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1340196069/
#8 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1346800288/
#9 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1353182673/
#10 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1360549149/
#11 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260033/
#11.5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260120/
#12 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1372849946/-255,257-
#13 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1368127055/
#14 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1395672319/
#15 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1409746601/
#16 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1420075161/
#17 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1430947686/
#18 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1440133389/
#19 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1447380051/
#20 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1454364216/
#21 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1462941578/
#22 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1473295155/-383,385-
#23 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1480168637/
#24 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1489348442/
2GET!
<a href="http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1489348442/996">>>/996</a>
Really? I haven't been to that many airports, but I assumed things like shoes were federal TSA policies that individual airports couldn't affect.
Ah, a toast, to me! Long live me!
>>3
I've seen it at least 3 different US airports. (One was Seattle, can't remember the other two.) After googling it seems they can sometimes replace the shoe-requirement with dog sniffing.
Unfortunately people are so used to removing shoes and laptops, the TSA agents had to be constantly shouting "LAPTOPS STAY IN YOUR BAG, SHOES STAY ON." It seemed to ultimately be faster though.
Oh no, I've done something terrible.
How come we have another Current Thought thread without finishing the other one first?
>>8
One is for cute girls. You can tell by the way the recent posts are all about keyboards.
Espadrille or wedge?
I wish the poster child for camels was the bactrian camel instead of the clearly interior dromedary camel.
,,__
.. / o._) Who are you calling interior?
/--\ \-'|| >>9
Weird they weren't talking about programming socks... Still, the OP should have encompassed it in "previous threads" list.
>>13
Looks like a kopipe job. Plus there have been double-new-threads in the past, and this one had what you could call drama if it weren't done entirely by lethargic NEETs. Give yourself a quick scroll down the cute girls first 100.
Previous double-thread is listed. And there was drama too, as both struggled to stay on the front page...
The previous double thread is now considered DQN canon by virtue of its historical value.
Listen bucko, I don't make the rules, and >>1 doesn't have to follow them. There are plenty of vestigial [Contentless] threads and this one certainly won't be the last.
benis head
Stone Quackers? No thanks!
hungryfox.org:4649/queue/
Is literally every live Japanese chat room now about FGO?
> mfw tezuka had a locked drawer full of erotic furry and TF sketches that wouldn't be out of place on deviantart
hey wouldn't it be easier to write this code after rum #5?
answer: apparemtny
I think I'll start using "like the shy one at an orgy"
I accidentally posted with a tripcode for the first time in a long, long, long long time
Beavis and Butthead
Shit, I called it the penultimate chapter when it should have obviously been the final chapter. In my own thread.
is mc ride ok?
isn't he based on corpus christi
also zach hill and that other guy with the synths
Never thought about it before, but a city being called "Body of Christ" is kinda weird.
It sounds better than Sanguis Christi
I really wouldn't want the Mona Lisa to watch me shower
come mister tally man tally me banana
daylight come and me wan go home
s2e11, "Contagion"
first utterance of the phrase "Tea. Earl Grey. Hot." is greeted with a bowl of flowers
Vitamin D
>>32,39
I'm curious how many speakers of Pidgin actually find this more readable than proper English. First of all, Pidgin English is an oral language, nobody learns to read Pidgin. If anybody has learned to read, they've learned English or some other standardized language. I especially don't see the point of using transliterated spellings ("dem" vs. "them", etc.) considering that anybody who has learned to read would have learned the "proper" spelling.
Second, Pidgin is not standardized. It's a mix of English and local languages, so there are quite wide variations depending on the location. It seems that the BBC solves this problem by focusing on Nigerian Pidgin but using only the most common slang words. The result is not really full-fledged Pidgin, more like English with Pidgin grammar and transliterated spelling. They estimate that 75 million Nigerians speak Pidgin, but how many of those actually want to read this watered-down Pidgin?
Also, these article titles made me giggle:
"Why dem dey call Hurricane human being name"
"Ghana import 30 million condoms but dem no use am"
Then I remembered that proper English article titles are often just as stupid.
>>40 you mean to tell me that this is all just a poorly thought out attempt by the BBC to virtue signal how much they love diversity and multiculturalism? I am shocked, shocked I say!
>>40
I was thinking this when reading the article. I can't imagine this came from a well thought out conversation between reasonable people. Some guy probably pitched it, and they just greenlit it in an effort to be inclusive then got some sucker who dey tasked wit don writing dem articles.
Manslaughter#involuntary_manslaughter -> Moscone-Milk assassinations -> White Night riots -> Kaposi's sarcoma -> AIDS-defining clinical condition -> Discredited_HIV/AIDS_origins_theories -> Retrovirus -> RNA world hypothesis -> Abiogenesis
that was a weird 4 hours, how did I get here
Anchorman has a few great one-liners, like "60 percent of the time, it works every time," "well, that escalated quickly," and "I love lamp." But when you actually watch the movie, it's terrible.
I guess most comedy movies are really just 1 minute of funny jokes and 89 minutes of filler.
>>44
yeah, I like to make references to the scent of rich mahogany and leatherbound books once in a while, but it's not a movie I'd care to watch again
You ask me which one I support, I say it's like if shit and piss were fighting in the street. Sure, I might have an extremely marginal preference for one over the other but what I really wish for is that someone would just flush the toilet so I didn't have to look at either of them anymore.
>>44
Hm, it's a typical "Frat Pack" comedy. Gravitates too close to SNL's "we gotta do this live every week, let's just stretch the joke till its thinner than tinfoil" concept. Hardly the first time anyone's made a feature film forgetting that good ones take special advantage of the medium, but perhaps a basis of comparison of how typical comedy films outta Hollywood lately don't seem to hold up.
If you compare it to comedy films of prior decades (the shitty forgettable ones, let's leave the hits out of this), there seems to be a general avoidance of rapid-fire wit, slapstick, visual comedy with practical FX props, being perceived as politically incorrect (not even daring to toy with your sense of it), and jokes too erudite for most people to get. I mean, for my tastes, good riddance to "gross-out" humor and shallow parodies,* but in an era of widespread film piracy and competitive streaming services, this unwillingness to take risks seems like a bad call.
I will say I much dislike Will Ferrell's usual buffoon roles; he's funnier as a straight man and it's an easier sell considering he's 6'3".