[Contentless] ITT you post right now [ASAP] your current thought [Brains][Thinking][Personal][#29]

[Contentless] ITT you post right now [ASAP] your current thought [Brains][Thinking][Personal][#29] (999)

1 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9080 13:55 [No]

fat thread edition

979 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 03:59 [No]

>>975
vague and mysterious

980 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 06:38 [No]

https://nationalpost.com/life/the-important-questions-why-the-quote-tweet-is-the-absolute-worst-twitter-function

981 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 08:22 [No]

>>980 before i even start reading, is it because its function is 100% covered by the reply function and it's just a way for bluechecks to make sure all their followers see their SUPER IMPORTANT OPINION EPIC EGG TAKEDOWN

982 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 08:28 [No]

Oh no.

983 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 10:45 [No]

Who is this Jordan Peterson guy and why is he getting a lot of attention lately?

984 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 11:31 [No]

how can you even cast ice barrage if you have a fire cape equipped? wouldn't it become water barrage?

985 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 11:39 [No]

Technically, the Death Grips song "No Love Deep Web" should be "No Love Dark Web." Deep web is a real thing, but it's not what they were aiming for. Any page that requires a login or isn't indexed by search engines = deep web. Tor = dark web. If they're going for the edgelord angle, it should be dark web.

986 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 12:13 [No]

>>985 How can you be sure what they were aiming for?

987 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 12:24 [No]

>>986
deep web is boring and not that interesting

people commonly say deep web when they really mean dark web

deep web = some regular house with a lock on the door, in a regular neighborhood, nothing really interesting

dark web = secret underground crime syndicate and edgelords

not exactly, but you get the idea

death grips is edgy, which do you think they were going for?

988 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 12:26 [No]

they specifically mention Tor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Love_Deep_Web#Promotion

989 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 15:37 [No]

Eeeh, maji? Easy modo?

990 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 16:36 [No]

>>987
i mean, yeah they were going for that cyberpunk vibe but aren't really tech savyy. they also thought 4chan was a cool hangout for hackers but wasn't really.

but, to be honest, i find the concept of the deep web itself a whole lot more fascinating than "the dark web". i mean, a lot of criminal shit probably gets arranged on facebook messenger and whatsapp. so it's boring and mundane but in a way so is crime.
behind locked doors, someone might be planning some weird embezzlement scheme, you never know.

991 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 16:46 [No]

>>990
you logging in to gmail or twitter is the deep web
wow, fascinating

992 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 16:50 [No]

and yes, some people are dumb enough to do criminal stuff on facebook, but they do get caught

big tech companies cooperate with law enforcement and I'm sure they flag certain keywords or even image checksums (and also image recognition via neural networks), so you're owned as soon as you post something bad, like talking about a drug deal, or posting bad images, like of drugs or weapons

you know how facebook can find faces in images and it suggests that you tag people? well image recognition can apply to other things too, not just faces, so if you post a bag of weed on messenger then it could know

maybe they don't actually do that, but I'm saying it's possible, just like how captcha knows about street signs and shit

it doesn't make sense for people to do crime on facebook when they could use Tor and whatnot instead

993 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 17:25 [No]

>just like how captcha knows about street signs and shit

Is it captcha that knows? I thought those things were like collaborations with relevant companies, for instance identifying the street signs, cars, bikes etc. was helping image recognition for self-driving cars and stuff. Maybe I'm wrong, but I got that idea from a few years ago when you'd get two blurry words, and one was a captcha test word and one was from an old book that OCR scanners weren't certain about, so people were indirectly helping to digitise old literature; there was a thing going round that, since the captcha test didn't actually know itself what the other word was, you could put any word and it would pass the test so people were entering "CUNTFLAPS" or something to fuck with the system XD

994 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 17:28 [No]

Same with when it was house numbers, at first I deliberately entered similar-looking but wrong digits because I was worried it was helping to catch crime suspects, and I am not a grass. But after a while that didn't seem to work anymore, it was more certain about what the number shown was.

995 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 17:39 [No]

Those are Google's captchae for its own purposes. Don't look too far into it.

996 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 18:18 [No]

they're developing self-driving cars that will make google execs richer and make millions of people unemployed

997 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 19:06 [No]

High tech, low life.

998 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 19:31 [No]

>>999
Sweet trips, homie.
Make a wish.

999 Name: (*ﾟーﾟ) : 1993-09-9117 19:45 [No]

We wuz kangz n shiet

	Return Entire thread Previous 100 posts Last 50 posts
	This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.