[Contentless] ITT you post right now [ASAP] your current thought [Brains][Thinking][Personal][#35] (999)

1 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9712 17:34

Previously:
#1 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1213916710/
#2 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1250275007/
#3 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1292544745/
#4 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1315193920/
#5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1326391378/
#6 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1333279425/
#7 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1340196069/
#8 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1346800288/
#9 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1353182673/
#10 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1360549149/
#11 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260033/
#11½ http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260120/
#12 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1372849946/
#13 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1368127055/
#14 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1395672319/
#15 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1409746601/
#16 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1420075161/
#17 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1430947686/
#18 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1440133389/
#19 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1447380051/
#20 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1454364216/
#21 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1462941578/
#22 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1473295155/
#23 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1480168637/
#24 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1489339924/
#24½ http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1489348442/
#25 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1503631448/
#26 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1519019746/
#27 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1526013591/
#28 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1529348654/
#29 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1531317324/
#30 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1534535341/
#31 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1540327913/
#32 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1548736885/
#33 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1557010373/

636 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9836 04:59

total recall isn't really part of the same set as robocop and starship troopers

637 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9836 05:36

life is tough and i eat a butt
butt eat a butt eat a bu-uuu-uu-uutttt
butt eat a butt eat a bu-uu-uuu-uutttt

638 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9836 05:57

Out of the 5 (6 if you count Dragon Zord) Dinozords, only Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops are actually dinosaurs.

639 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9836 08:38

EL HORNO DE MICROONDAS

640 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9836 15:54

Switch off brain.

641 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9836 16:23

The most common colorways for guitars and basses are dumb, and it makes me irritated to go shopping for one because they're all either the same five dumb colorways, ugly/bad design in some other way, or really expensive.

642 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9836 18:01

ooohhh my window compositor was off, no wonder KDE was performing so well

643 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9836 21:17

While looking through my old imageboard bookmarks, I stumbled upon a now dead board called depreschan. It seems that I made this bookmark years ago, maybe in 2017 when the board was young and freshly spammed everywhere else.
Now, this on it's own would be unsurprising, until I looked in my "temporary bookmarks" folder, where I store sites that I am uncertain about, as a sort of reminder to read them later and assess them for value as a permanent bookmark. Naturally, this temporary bookmarks folder is anything but temporary as I haven't cleaned it in many, many years. What I found in that deep, dark abyss of bookmark hell, was two groups of a handful of depreschan threads, saved for later reading. And these two groups, both saved intervals of around a year between them. What does this mean? Why would I save these "test threads," meant for assessing a board for bookmarkability, when I had already properly bookmarked the site much earlier? It's simple, I had forgotten. Depreschan was such an unnotable site that each time I ran across the spam advertising it, I mistook it for a new board and bookmarked it anew.
Three times. Three times I saw it spammed. Three times I thought it was new. Thus, twice I failed to recognize it.

The verdict: Depreschan wasn't a very good board.

also my bookmarks need cleaning ;__;

644 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9836 22:23

>>643
For once I'd like to see one of those boards actually last and develop a proper community.
Which is a stupid statement when you consider that I barely ever bother to check any of them out.

645 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9837 06:29

I've never seen a chan that was (mass-)advertised that wasn't worthless. Every place I regularly visit I've found because it was mentioned off-hand in a thread that was otherwise interesting. If an operator is advertising their chan by drive-by posting on others, it's a really good sign that it sucks.

In my humble opinion (I've been running a tiny chan for ~3 years), running a chan should be like losing a game of chicken. When a group of people have a common interest that they cannot suitably explore through any of their current communication channels, they gradually get more and more frustrated until eventually one of them snaps and says "Fine, I'll pay a few bucks a month for a VPS". Maybe the result takes off, maybe it doesn't.

Without such a community to support or problem to solve, a chan seems nothing more than an ego project, and advertising for it is just a request for the rest of the internet to subsidize the operator's vanity (or give them ad money). I would be very surprised if that ever resulted in a worthwhile community.

646 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9837 08:14

I just want to say, the Wikipedia article on imageboards is the absolute worst place to advertise your imageboard, foreign or otherwise.

647 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9837 19:07

I miss ii/waka. Especially /yuu/, which was quiet and comfy and just nice.

648 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9837 19:46

I see that we've got book-burning and eunuchs in this game, but no burning of scholars?

Disappointment!

649 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9837 21:52

>>647
Hello! Could you help me figure out where I could have gotten this collection of "scenic" images from? I downloaded it in late 2016 and extracted it in a folder simply named "yuu" at the time, but I haven't been able to find it in any of the archives of the board, which is where I'm assuming it's from.

https://mega.nz/file/2ANEBQxJ#EGsxPIhlaxmP8bJP14SNSgKHNPr0mDvb6D6pFqWMkdw (reupload)

650 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9838 05:34

Baybay u gon be the one that's gonna hold me down

651 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9838 09:25

PoMoFuEnSoooo!

652 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9838 10:02

nothingness

653 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9838 16:50

doors swang on niggas that got bad behavior
my 4 15s woke up ze neighbors
interior crocodile alligator
i drive a chevrolet movie theater

654 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9838 18:47

Hey, check out what I am at heart.

655 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9838 20:54

What if it turned out that the biblical holy ghost is just an euphemism for the flatus of Joseph's gay husband?

656 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 02:31

weenitz

657 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 06:23

>>649
I've been racking my brain for the last while and I can't come up with anything concrete. I wanna say there was a "places" or "travel" imageboard distinct from /yuu/ somewhere(?), but I don't know if it would've come from there.

658 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 14:45

>>657
There was a cityscapes imageboard on ii/waka. That might be what you're thinking of.

659 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 17:35

goddammit they're all talking about how all the characters in the show are secretly queer again

so fucking boring

660 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 18:02

>>651
the what?

661 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 18:22

Sunflower.

662 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 21:00

Maybe it's finally the time to stop forcing racial/lgbt/gender quota in media?

663 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 22:30

>>662
agreed, there's no need to clumsily shoehorn men, white people, and cishets into stories anymore

664 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 22:45

that was a bad post and i hope you're ashamed of yourself

665 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 23:13

I feel no shame

666 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9839 23:16

hail satania everyday

667 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9840 01:45

cute fluffy hair skinny 19 year old boy walking his moms little dog in an oversized hoodie and thigh length shorts

668 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9840 05:03

I saw the internet talking about Hunter Pence and, being more informed about politics than baseball, thought it was some unholy fusion of Hunter Biden and Mike Pence.

Having educated myself I still think that would be funnier.

669 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9840 05:54

My vc is ji so I'm going to post this weird Jii advert
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8CeP15EAS8

670 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9840 07:49

BROIL MY NIPPLES
HOLD DOWN MY ERECTION WITH YOUR MIGHTY ARMS
USE YOUR MIGHTY ARMS TO HOLD DOWN MY
ERECTION

I SMELL LIKE POOOP
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH YEAH
ALL THIS SWEATING AND EXERCISE HAS MADE MY SWEAT LEAK DOWN MY ASSCRACK AND MIX WITH MY LEAKING POOPOO
AND IN THIS HEAT, IT
    REEKS

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM THERES NO STOPPING ME NOW

671 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9840 12:03

Am I a good person?

672 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9840 15:43

Triceratops Horridus

673 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9840 22:58

>>658 Oh yeah I posted cityscapes there

674 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9840 23:08

i guarantee you i use a greater volume and variety of spices than any retarded darkie who has ever claimed "wypipo dont season dey food!" because i am actually aware of the existence of spices beyond barbecue sauce and "seasoning salt"

675 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9841 01:21

>>668 here. Today people started talking about Kamala's death and I was even more confused.

676 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9841 06:59

slovenly slavs

677 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9841 09:47

A cute girl is reading this.

678 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9841 09:51

Honey, I Turned the Group Chat Trans

679 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9841 11:01

>>677
step on my penis

680 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9841 16:29

ara ara

681 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9841 19:36

crushing bore-dumb

682 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9842 01:03

my first thought when seeing the headline "1-pound micro preemie who spent 122 days in NICU reunites with life-saving medical staff" was

what if that baby grows up to be a total asshole

683 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9842 03:06

following politics on twitter is a great curse

684 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9842 07:13

what a horrible night to be reminded of the current state of american politics

685 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9842 08:11

Let's think about boobs.

686 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9842 09:24

I absolutely love how communists get blamed for the rampant politrectal correctness when it's the good ol' US of A forcing it on everybody else.

687 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9842 17:30

retopologize my anus

688 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 03:16

ride my dinosaurus

689 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 04:47

Am i gonna have to sue my own damn mother.

690 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 07:58

It amazes me how many people keep trying to solve the problem "how to make a community that doesn't suck?"

  • BBS: cult of high post count regulars, endless "game" threads with little real content, flame wars, fluff to content ratio is extremely skewed
  • SomethingAwful: tried to filter out crap with 10bux and heavy bans, some good things came out of it, but still mostly mediocre and not really worth the 10+bux.
  • 4chan: tried to put more emphasis on content over status with anonymity and light moderation, kinda backfired in that people take this to mean free reign to be the worst version of themselves. Plus they have little incentive to put effort into their posts.
  • Facebook: wow, turns out drama is even worse when it's people you know!
  • Twitter: The platform inherently favors "hot takes", one-liner jokes, and knee-jerk reactions over any kind of thoughtful discussion.
  • Digg/Reddit: tried to filter discussion with upvote/downvotes. Sometimes works but tends to just make the most banal hivemind obvious opinion get upvoted, since upvotes/downvotes are misused as "agree/disagree" buttons. Also suffers from the snowball effect where upvoted content is seen by more people and thus upvoted even more.
  • IRC/Discord: can be good depending on the community, but the nature of chat means that posts tend to be short, frivolous, and typed without much thought involved.
  • Diaspora/Ello/Google Plus: evidently didn't offer enough advantages over existing systems to get people to switch.

I think the lesson here is that it doesn't matter how many restrictions and innovations and bells and whistles you throw onto a platform, the core problem remains: most people are boring at best and toxic at worst.

691 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 11:36

>>690
That's a good observation.

  • BBSes are often topical that makes them "wash out" over time, since the actual on-topic discussion/information sharing is limited before repeating itself. Because of this and usual heavy moderation, it turns into an echo-chamber of sorts. Hence, the off-topic subforums are usually the most lively ones.
  • SA is a general BBS, inheriting most of its flaws. As such, paying tenbux to suck up to the mods isn't worth it.
  • Reddit and oh-so-many "karma"-based forums are just jerking it to another counter.
  • AIBs like 4chan (and - RIP - textboards) is a mixture of people who understand the purpose of anonymity and those who think it's about acting like a retarded ape. Good boards become popular but then rapidly degrade in quality when this mixture gets too lean.
  • Twitter is just stupid by design: take a simple thought and make it fit the line. They even ended up implementing "threads" so the user can share series of deep over-simplified thoughts.
  • Group chats like IRC are "in the now", so searching for useful information in the past is like looking for a needle in a haystack.

692 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 12:29

fuck her poop hole

693 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 12:53

>>692 what if i fuck yours instead?

694 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 13:50

ok

695 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 18:19

online communities are all a problem without solution because they are all actually a simulation of socialization. they're ersatz-communities with varying degrees of authenticity but none actually being the real thing, which is really what every online community unknowingly aspires to be.

696 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 18:52

Minor 7 chords are just disgusting. Gross. They sound like a major and a minor chord played together.

697 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 21:52

>>696
I'll take any you're not using. I love 'em.

698 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 22:12

>>690
Cmon, we've all experienced both and know that the corporate-owned versions are the worst of the bunch. A corporation has no serious incentive to make a forum good; good forums don't make money. on the contrary flame wars drive engagement; twitter and Facebook would be insolvent without the nazis (maybe reddit too). I will even go as far as to say reddit was better before it was owned by conde nast (though it was still a corporate site at that time, it used to have a reputation for being less full of self-promotion and groupthink than digg in particular).

The bigger problem is just that corporate sites have captured attention to the extent that there can't be another big indie forum that tries to fix the problems with forums. There hasn't been anything new on that front since 4chan. That and increased regulatory burden (dmca, counterterrorism, etc) on indie forum owners i would guess. The latter half of the sites you list were never trying to make forums good, they were trying to make forums profitable. Making forums good was always just PR for them.

Also IRC might have serious potential if it had decent logging capacities, embedded media, and a less archaic interface, none of which are problem with the users

699 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 22:42

>>698
I think Discord/Slack have tried those improvements, but everybody wants to do infinite scroll and not put any effort into having a decent way of searching/organizing/accessing.

Kind of a subject change, but it seems like ever since the advent of smartphones, UI trends have gone back toward modal everything, which is really sad to watch (and infuriating to experience), because that's one of the great sinkholes we'd made so much progress (at great effort) climbing out of since the 80s.

700 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9843 23:41

>>699 discord and telegram (never tried slack) def improved the img/video and UI situation from IRC. But i think their search features are intentionally bad to disincentivize people from using it. New posts maybe make better data to sell. (Speaking of search being expensive, did anyone else notice when google stopped bothering to be any good at search around i wanna say ten years ago? I guess they realized they could cut their operating expenses since they dominate the market) This could be fixed if selling data wasnt the goal.

Curious to hear an example about the UI thing. I never really learned the basic terms of UI.

701 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9844 00:33

>>700
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modal_window

I guess that may not have been the most precise way of describing what I mean, but the core of what I'm getting at is the assumption that the user can only do one thing at a time, can only look at one window at a time, and so is forbidden from having access to more than any one thing at a time. This might make some sense on a small screen where your only input device is a substantial fraction of the screen's width, and that's about the only place it might make some sense.

You get one window in Discord or Slack, which means everything else you were doing when you decide you want to search is obscured\a pain in the neck if you're trying to compare things, or are referencing something. Switch channels and you might get taken to the source of your most recent notification, but be careful not to switch away before you've caught up or you'll lose your place and you might have to scroll up quite a ways to find it again. The prefs dialog similarly obscures everything entirely until you're done with it. In iTunes, as another example, you can no longer open a playlist in a separate window and compare/manage playlists easily. Why? Because you can't do that on a phone, so why would you do it on a computer? Want to view the album artwork as more than a thumbnail? Say goodbye to the entire rest of the UI. A lot of websites will make it hard to open pages in a new tab, requiring an interruption in flow to access whatever's being linked. If it was in an infinite-scroll column, you have to restart the flow from the beginning because you've now lost your place, and it might be generated differently this time because chronological ordering is apparently lame and for suckers.

702 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9844 03:36

Human interaction is autism, getting fascinated by numbers isn't.

703 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9844 03:58

a teleogical approach to My Big Fat Greek Wedding

704 Name: >>690 : 1993-09-9844 04:14

>>691
Agree on all points. The best boards I've found so far tend to be anonymous text boards with a community big enough to be active, but small enough to not be inundated by shitposters, like dqn, saovq, and 6ch. Of course, these sites still have their own problems and drama.

>>698
Oh, I completely agree. I think the commercialization and corporate takeover of the internet is one major reason that the systems are not really improving for the users. In many ways they are actually getting worse. Addictive content drip-feed with infinite scroll and emoji reactions to keep you mindlessly engaged with the least effort possible.
[I disagree with the idea that Nazis are one of the biggest problem with modern social media; I think they are far less widespread than people make them out to be, and act as a distraction from the bigger issue, but that's a whole 'nother can of worms.]

705 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9844 05:39

There are some advantages to modal behavior when speed is a more important factor--it can reduce precision requirements--but it's especially frustrating that most modalities in practice do not warrant such extreme restrictions and do not take advantage of reduced precision at all.
The essence of information technology is communication. So it's something of a crime that the trends have been away from a computer where everything in it can talk to everything else if so desired (which modalities do interfere with). This is, as far as I can tell, what Alan Kay was really thinking as a pie-in-the-sky ideal when it came to his conception of an "object". Not so much any implementation attempt, separate reinvention of it, or rigid bastardization of it, but rather the idea that if you kept building it, you'd eventually be making a Star Trek sort of computer that doesn't need a protocol for every damned thing, it is itself the protocol. This was a legitimate point Terry Davis (pbuh) had, that computers had stopped having this sense of fun as fewer and fewer programs could be lego'd with each other and within themselves.
Yeah, yeah, security and performance and shit, but I expected by now it'd be a default behavior to like, drag and drop all sorts of things that programs currently don't let you (and the current crop probably never will) as a form of basic bitch automation. Just as an example, putting a bunch of web search queries into a text file, dragging the file or selection into the browser, and have them open a bunch of tabs.
I should have understood human nature a little better. The average users aren't as interested in making the computer work hard for them as they are interested in feeling like they aren't working hard at all. And then it became accepted practice to fully commit to chasing and converting these uninterested people to computing instead of leaving options open.
There was recently a post out there by some guy whose job at Microsoft was Task Manager back in the 90s. He'd clearly spent a lot of time thinking about ways to make it as good at the task as possible while also making it appear very bare bones.

706 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9844 06:19

>>701 oh, yeah, i totally understand what u mean now. It's awful. Though on the website tip at least it's not the bad old days when half the web including every gubmint website required IE6.

On that note fuck mozilla for banning the user agent switching extensions, im still mad about that

707 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9844 06:54

>>704
Yeah it might be that the cancel culture campaigns or nextdoor/fb gossip/racism is a bigger website element than the nazis, for instance. In any case, the websites incentivize bad behaviour because controversy increases traffic. Im not super familiar with what it's like to actually use these sites regularly anymore.

708 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9844 08:03

>>701 That bugs me too, I've happily been using iTunes since the beginning basically and it got better and tighter and more useful, then I think it started going downhill about version 8 when they added Genius. It seems like each version they add something new I have no use for and take away or change something I liked about it. Especially not being able to open a big version of the album art anymore, what a shame...

709 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9844 08:52

>>706
There are still government websites that require IE, although in my experience it seems like they aren't consistent anymore about which version is the right one, and sometimes you just see a boilerplate compatibility disclaimer from one of the previous iterations of the site. So if you don't happen to be running Windows you still get to play Internet2004™ and try all the browsers until you either get through or find out that nope, they hired the crappy developers again this time.

>>708
I was a SoundJam MP holdout for a long time, but then I got gifted a nice iPod and yeah. For me I think iTunes 10 was the last version I was happy with. I assumed 11 was a hasty beta rollout and they'd fill things in later and it'd eventually be fine like it was with OSX itself, but, well...

Yeah, don't get me started on the iPhone's Music app, either.

710 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9844 21:07

Anus. AYYYnus... Snus anus.

711 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9845 02:57

Diggin Q Nougat

712 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9845 06:36

Dix Boner

713 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9845 09:25

Thinking bad thoughts.

714 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9845 18:22

715 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9846 06:37

celebrating V-J day by killing kissanime

716 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9846 13:18

puriizu kiru mii

717 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9846 19:08

just because words are synonymous doesnt always mean they mean the same thing

718 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9847 00:00

ride my stinkhorn

719 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9847 02:24

Sign, Signal, and Symbol

720 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9847 03:51

SCOOPS Haagenti

721 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9847 07:08

>>696
Minor 7th chords are beautiful, and so are their natural extensions (9th, 11th, 13th, etc.)

Of course, music is subjective and to each their own, but I believe there are some objective arguments that the minor seventh is a "good" chord.

A 3:2 interval (perfect fifth) sounds pure and sonorous to the human ear, because of its natural occurrence in nature in the overtone series. (In equal temperament, the ratio is not a perfect 3:2, but close enough that the ear tends to perceive it as such, and non-fixed pitch instruments like voice and strings will naturally play a perfect 3:2.)

A minor seventh is two of these beautiful 3:2 intervals stacked upon each other. Furthermore, the interval between the second and third note is a major third, (close to 5:4) the next interval in the overtone series.

The result is a lush bouquet of overlapping overtones, which can be further emphasized by adding more and more perfect fifths above, (9th degree is 3:2 above the 5th degree, 11th is 3:2 above the 7th, 13th is 3:2 above the 9th, etc.) Thus these two complementary stacks of perfect fifths intertwine and extend into the heavens eternally.

The above might be confusing, so let's take a concrete example. Start with C4 and add a perfect fifth above: G4. The 3:2 ratio sounds grand and open.
Now add another perfect fifth above the G: D5. Now we are going higher in the overtone series: an overtone of the overtone.
Add another: A5.
Now we have a huge four note chord with big gaps in between:
C4 - G4 - D5 - A5
It sounds open and grand. Now let's fill in the gaps with an identical chord, but shifted.

Where do we start? Well, there are two options which divide the space evenly: major or minor third. When starting a major third above C4 (E4) and you get a major 13th chord:
C4 - E4 - G4 - B4 - D5 - F#5 - A5 - C#6
Also a nice chord, but it shines a bit too bright, and the C4 and C#6 clash.

Instead, let's start a minor third above at Eb4.
C4 - Eb4 - G4 - Bb4 - D5 - F5 - A5 - C6
Ah, now the alternating Minor Third and Major Third intervals come full circle around to the root note. You have something truly delicious. Dissonant enough to be crunchy, but enough pure intervals to be sonorous.

This is the key. It's unbeatable. However, if you play this chord there is a danger that you'll be marked by other musicians; it's a double-edged sword. I can't recommend it to amateurs.

What this all really means, though, is that you, >>696, should just stick with a dominant seventh.

722 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9847 13:04

I wish the bald anglo FUCK would go away

723 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9847 17:47

jeff bezos

724 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9847 18:02

jeff besos
kissy kissy

725 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9847 22:36

I want to live.

726 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9848 13:13

Enjoy life and JUMP in the air!

727 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9848 22:56

I'm still trapped in the same old cycles.

728 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9848 23:37

the fuck is this "Uzaki-chan" shit?

729 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9848 23:54

>>728
some people on twitter are mad that a 2D girl, who is canonically college-aged in a truly rare feat for anime, is a shortstack with really big eyes. they have been accusing anyone who doesn't mind her appearance of being a pedophile

i wonder how they'll react to yoko littner (age 14) when they discover she exists

730 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9849 01:21

A beautiful mountain landscape, the Eiffel tower shining brilliantly in the night, a majestic Medieval castle poking out of a comfy town. These kinds of "beautiful photographs" are so ubiquitous as to become meaningless. You see them on desktop backgrounds, advertisements, Web 2.0 sites.

Thus we become desensitized to the medium and nothing really impresses us. Even if we were to travel to one of these famous places, to see with our own eyes the majestic Neuschwanstein or the sweeping Iguazu Falls, what would be the point? Perhaps we would be moved and impressed and awed for a minute. Maybe even for an hour. We would take a picture and move on.

It's not just nature or great works of architecture. CGI, for example, used to be so new and impressive, but now it is so ever-present and realistic that it ceases to be amazing. We might momentarily marvel at how beautiful and realistic the latest AAA graphics are, but the luster wears off as we are bombarded with "Beauty".

The mainstream sense of conventional "beauty" has been so commodified and amplified and endlessly replicated that it has lost its sense of wonder. These days the things that impress me instead are the strange, the weird, the ugly, the mundane, the unique.

731 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9849 04:41

>>729
Lol i watched the whole show back when it came out and i had no idea yoko is supposed to be 14

732 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9849 07:58

>>731
yoko is 16

733 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9849 08:25

>>730 I agree

734 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9849 08:35

>>732
a shitload of random websites claim otherwise when you google "yoko littner age"

735 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9849 10:35

>>730
Without that beauty, there is no call to higher being, you know? This is also why--why I've mentioned to people that they should clean up their rooms--that's become quite the Internet meme--but I'm really serious about it, because it's really hard to do that. And I've been cleaning up my room, by the way, for about four months now, because my life was thrown into such a catastrophe and--and also we were renovating, and so--but it isn't just that you clean it up. You also make it beautiful. And beaut--it's really hard to make something beautiful.

I think there's more tourists in France than there are people most of the time. And part of the reason for that is it's just so damned beautiful; you just can't stand it. And you think, what's the economic value of that? It's absolutely incalculable. And what's interesting, too, is that you build that beauty in, and then the farther away you get from it in time, the more valuable it becomes, right? Instead of decaying, it has exactly the opposite effect. Its value magnifies.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.