Previously:
#1 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1213916710/
#2 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1250275007/
#3 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1292544745/
#4 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1315193920/
#5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1326391378/
#6 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1333279425/
#7 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1340196069/
#8 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1346800288/
#9 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1353182673/
#10 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1360549149/
#11 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260033/
#11.5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260120/
#12 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1372849946/-255,257-
#13 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1368127055/
#14 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1395672319/
#15 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1409746601/
#16 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1420075161/
#17 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1430947686/
#18 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1440133389/
#19 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1447380051/
>>499 that's unethical on so many levels, both for you and the lawyers who would work for you, that I can't even describe it. Well, I can, but I'm too lazy to do it.
>>499
But if you give advice that's against the client's best interest, your clients will do worse than the competition and either switch law firms or go out of business. Your will doesn't trump the grinding force of capitalism that easily.
>>501
When has corrupting society ever been ethical?
>>502
Damn you capitalism! Truly the hero of the people. But since this is hypothetical, I could imagine some scenarios in which this works. You could provide lawyers to the competition as well, so that no one has an advantage.
Or your legal advice could not be so disadvantageous that it puts the company at any real loss. Say you advise a large tech company to add to their terms of service that some use of their sevice is prohibited. Maybe because this use of their serivce would be harmful to some investment you made.
You encourage this change by telling the tech company that allowing this use could lead to lawsuits and it's best to be safe. Most users might not use this software in that way and most won't even read the TOS, so it puts the company at no real risk. If you wanted to enforce this, you could go one step further, and have the company implement software for monitoring the user to see if they break the TOS, and have them take whatever legal actions are needed to fine or jail these users.
Hearing a nine year old girl say "smoke weed every day" feels so wrong in so many ways.
>>501
If he was doing it for ethical reasons it could be a good thing.
Especially if they're already in a legal grey area, or doing something that would be unpopular if they were caught - walk them into controversy, then watch the fireworks.
In my fantastic fantasies, this is used to hurt technology companies that compromise user privacy. In my more realistic hypothetical, it's preventing something environmentally harmful since environmental issues lead to the biggest bandwagons. (though really, if you really want to save the planet from an oil company, you'd want to train engineers badly, not hope that having them accidentally violate EU working time directive 36B category D subsection 11F would have the news media draw attention to the fact their oil platforms are killing the endangered cutefish.)
>>502
He'd have to do it to excess for that to happen. Every law firm must make an occasional mistake, after all. Or he could cut his prices to make up the risk.
>>505 well, it would still be unethical under the rules of ethics that pretty much every state bar follows. If we're talking moral reasons, that's another thing - but the lawyers would be in deep shit for misleading their own clients, even if those clients happen to be bastards.
Another ethical rule a lot of people don't know about is that to own or to even hold a non-controlling interest in a law firm, you have to be a lawyer. So maybe >>499 could pull off his scheme, but he'd have to get a law degree first (which he'd soon lose, along with probably a lot of money after getting reamed with malpractice suits.)
> is it impossible to secretly employ a lawyer to own a firm for you?
Yeah, even that would be against the rules of ethics. The rationale behind the rule against non-lawyers owning an interest in law firms is that a non-lawyer should never be in a position to dictate or influence the legal judgment of a lawyer. So if a non-lawyer is directing a lawyer's work (in terms of "legal strategy", basically) that's unethical. Of course, a client can still direct a lawyer to file a legit suit or to take a settlement offer or something like that.
As for the tech company example - this would probably be okay. As long as your advice isn't really putting the company at any disadvantage at all, it's probably not unethical. If you're benefiting on the side from the advice you're giving your client somehow, though, that might be breaking the rules of ethics (there's some stuff in there against insider trading, etc.)
>>509 I should add that if your advice is misleading, even if it doesn't hurt your client to give them that info, it's probably breaking the ethics rules. I didn't catch that part at first.
By the by, I don't recommend becoming a lawyer.
>>509,510
I'm not talking about whether this is legal or not. Just if you could get away with it.
"Literally" is literally "figuratively" and has been for literally centuries.
Hillbilly booze cruise: two inflatable six man boats tied together. A keg in an inner tube is dragged behind. The entire operation should be around $550.
>>511 purely as a hypothetical matter - you sure wouldn't get away with it if anyone at your corporate client realized your advice was inaccurate. And lots of companies have in-house counsel who will know for sure if you're trying to fuck them over.
Ah...
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
THAT IS NOT ENOUGH W's
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGE
Sometimes when I'm lying awake at night cuddling my pillow, I think about all the thousands upon thousands of cute girls who've been orphaned, or neglected, or are just really lonely, and who are right then lying awake cuddling their own pillows.
Seeeeend meeeeee the pillow that you dream ooonnnn~
horrendous interdigital athlete's foot!
God help me, I've gone too deep, get me out of here.
f.lux doesn't work too well on TN panels.
>>517
wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
This is pretty DQN: http://www.audi.jp/kaomoji/
>>525
It makes you want to gauge your eyes out on IPS, so don't worry about it. It's just a piece of trendy shit for nerds.
Also they didn't bother to bring extra settings from mac to pc version for years. Fuck them.
This google april fool's prank is very funny, in the sense that it will spark debate among tech pundits regarding expectations of trust and privacy when using web services such as gmail. I'm laughing already.
Who the fuck calls their kid Utsuro, seriously?
You don't want me? I don't want you. Fuck you, Harvard.
My current goal in life is to have sex with a buxom woman.
"If I had a Hammer" is about penis envy.
my current goal in life is to have sex with a woman.
also get my phd.
guess which one i'm doing better at
I don't want to feel it
I do want to think it, however
I LOVE YOU NANAHIRA
>>537 This is the best! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYDzFNd1DmI
It pisses me off when people say a conflict is "just about land." As if it's about five year-olds fighting over a toy. Stupid fuckers - just because you rent an apartment in the city, you think land isn't important? Land is everything. You own land, you own valuable resources, water rights, fishing rights, farming/grazing areas, etc. Land is maybe the only thing in the world that it makes sense to fight over.
>>532,534
Just order a woman for fucking and get along with your life. On the other hand, I want to fuck something that doesn't exists. This is where it gets complicated.
Or travel to Asia for inspiration, cultural enrichment and more bang for your buck. There are even villages like Xuan Thanh (on the beach not so far from Vinh) almost entirely dedicated to prostitution, though they mostly cater to locals and hardly known to tourists.
I didn't know Invader Zim was so anti-corporatism.
>>540-541
does this even work for grills
regardless i need a job first before i can afford shit like that. i think that's the main problem with trying to lose virginity in grad school. T/RAship doesn't cut it
>>543
I think female sex tourism usually happens in Central/South America and sometimes Africa. But yeah, you'd need money.
They are after my lucky charms.
Thank you, these are very wabi-sabi.
I'm loli at heart.
>>543
I'm bewildered by the thought that there are girls on the internet.
Men are gross! I mean, why would you even want to do it, yuck.
Italy and Greece is the place to go (looks like it's another stereotype with >>544 that southern men are hotter), but they are probably chock full of dirty, nasty immigrants these days. And since they are all have darker skin and speak foreign language, they would be impossible to tell apart. Not to mention that men are gross.
"Yes, I was calling with a problem about not being able to turn on my computer."
"Have you tried turning it off and on?"
>>543
Why would you even have doubts about it. If you can buy burritos at 3 in the morning in your city, you can hire a male prostitute.
>>548
No. Am lesbian. Non practicing lesbian. It seems now I am old enough that everyone else has experience and nobody wants to be my first time. I live in a small college town and there ain't too many grills here; I teach right now so I'm not trying to have sex with an undergrad. I also may have legit aspergers.
I don't think sex tourism is for me anyways. It's was an interesting flight of fancy but I don't think I'd enjoy it if I had sex that way.
sorry for making you all read mi diario amigos just wanted to clear that up i agree with you men are gross
>>551
I'm sure this is all obvious advice, but I suggest visiting or moving to a place with a high density of lesbians. For example, I live in the Bay Area and its reputation for being a homosexual haven is actually quite true. Over half of my female friends are lesbian and they all say it's easy to get laid here. You can do it through apps like Tinder, by visiting one of many lesbian bars, or even just in your daily life if you're confident enough to flirt with people. Of course it's still probably going to be a little difficult if you're unattractive or socially awkward, but to tell the truth I've met plenty of nerdy, awkward, unattractive women who are still happily getting laid here. (And I'm sure you're much hotter than them, fellow DQNer!)
Then again, if it's just sex you're after, vibrators+porn is probably better, honsetly. I think the main advantage to real-life sex is that feelings of affection for your partner make it feel better. In any case, I wish you luck.
If I were a girl I'd be so fuckin' gay.
You could really call anybody "The Scaleless".
I haven't seen modern dubs, but watching some of the older ones, all of the characters become much more direct and kind of bitchy in the dubbed version.
Sex tourism is the only option for sexual sadist lesbians.
Men who cut their dicks off to find intimacy as "lesbian" are weird. WEIRD!
>>551
People here might think differently, but your first time shouldn't be with a hired escort. I mean, once you get money, it won't be hard to find a hooker who's willing to do lesbian but... I don't recommend having your first time to be with a prostitute. It's terrible. Awful. Don't do it. I would've much preferred to swallow 20 minutes of awkwardness and rejection than doing that shit.
Try tinder or something.
>>557 I would agree if I thought there was a single man in the world who's ever done this, because it sounds fucking insane.
Then again, some people are insane, so it's probably happened at least a few times.
>>561
CWC comes close, but >she hasn't had any sort of surgery.
>>561
There are plenty of people who married and then did sex reassignment but still liked their partner.
Don't be put off just because your first time goes bad. I kept talking about how the champagne-flavoured condoms were really stinky, and I was sweating like crazy. Look at me now though, I'm a sex god!
>>564
Since recent times, both, actually. They are sisters now.
The Wachowskis changed their avatars' gender inside the matrix lol
Yeah, kidney stone, park half way down my dicktube. THANKS A LOT you itchy little fuck.
Be a bisexual bee
>>569
Awesome, will try to contribute in whatever way possible.
This is how it is done.
An AI beat a 9 Dan professional Go player for the best time last month. Cool.
Well, now I understand why everyone wants to become a monk/nun.
What do you do when you're feeling blue?
>>576 I definitely think about that myself sometimes. Seems like a way less stressful life. But there are probably stressful things about being a monk or a nun too that we don't know about.
If you kill the tranny in the new Baldur's Gate thing, does she drop a pair of fake melons?
So, if I do it, it might actually work. It does make sense.
But why did it not work before with them?
Hell yeah, I got a 20% student discount on my new dildo.
genuinely reflecting
>>580
I've got a couple of projects in mind for IPFS, one being a standard DNS TXT static website.
The other is a distributed BBS sort of resembling a blockchain. Once I start actually working on it, and if my understanding of IPFS is correct, it should be able to mitigate (some) anonymity issues of running over plain IP.
>>584
Yeah, a bbs would be awesome, but I don't understand how you'd get the most recent commit. I still don't really know how it all works, but what it looks like to me is that the hash of the commit you have can only point to previous commits of itself and can't be altered. If you were to make a bbs with this, how would you get the most recent comments?
Have they actually tested handling of hash collisions?
>>589
Also, there should be someway to calculate the probability of a collision happening within in one age of the universe using the birthday paradox, but I'm not smart enough to do that.
>>552,560
Thanks for the advice amigos. I'll be ok.
I should try tinder. But I'm too shy to do it and I don't have a Facebook account anyway and I'm not really willing to make one. Doesn't seem like you can get away with a fake one easily.
If I could just get rid of the man boobs, I'd be set.
>>591 You could try care homes or orphanages or something like that maybe? They always reek of desperation whenever I walk past
>>589
>>590
That's not very reassuring. We used to think md5sum was good. Now we don't, and we've known how to create collisions for it for a decade (http://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~selinger/md5collision/). SHA-1 is a 160-bit hash that we used to think was good. We now have (kinda) collision generation for it (https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/967 - read the Recommendations at https://sites.google.com/site/itstheshappening/ for a good overview of where on the ‘not good’ scale it falls).
To invoke the birthday paradox as you requested, the average time before A Bad Thing is given by the time to generate 2^(256/2) hashes for a 256-bit sum. Using your calculations, it's ~1e17 * AOU. Note that the same calculations for SHA-1 yield ~3e4 * AOU, and SHA-1 is considered unsafe. Even the humble md5sum yields ~0.04 * AOU, and I can generate a collision in seven minutes on a five year old personal computer (http://www.mathstat.dal.ca/~selinger/md5collision/).
Who is to say that their hash function will never be ‘not good’? Is there a way of sanely upgrading the infrastructure to use a different hash function later?
Alternately, there could be a very good reason why the hash can't be exploited. Git's design makes hash collisions only detrimental to the collider (you can't use a SHA-1 collision to send a poison commit that screws up a remote repository, it just results in your commit getting dropped (I think)). I don't immediately see that similar logic applies to this project, but if it does, it would be the best-case scenario.
Is it worse to be objectified or subjugated?
>>594
Thanks for the resources! As for a sane way to upgrade from SHA256, the first two bytes specify what hash they are using: "the first two bytes in hex is 1220, where 12 denotes that this is the SHA256 hash function and 20 is the length of the hash in bytes ― 32 bytes." I'm guessing they included that so that the hash could be changed at some point. That's just my guess though.
Scarlet is actually a really nice girls' name.