[Contentless] ITT you post right now [ASAP] your current thought [Brains][Thinking][Shark tits][#32] (999)

1 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9282 04:41

Previously:
#1 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1213916710/
#2 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1250275007/
#3 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1292544745/
#4 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1315193920/
#5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1326391378/
#6 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1333279425/
#7 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1340196069/
#8 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1346800288/
#9 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1353182673/
#10 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1360549149/
#11 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260033/
#11.5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1367260120/
#12 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1372849946/-255,257-
#13 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1368127055/
#14 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1395672319/
#15 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1409746601/
#16 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1420075161/
#17 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1430947686/
#18 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1440133389/
#19 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1447380051/
#20 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1454364216/
#21 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1462941578/
#22 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1473295155/-383,385-
#23 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1480168637/
#24 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1489339924/
#24.5 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1489348442/
#25 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1503631448/
#26 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1519019746/
#27 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1526013591/
#28 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1529348654/
#29 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1531317324/
#30 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1534535341/
#31 http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1540327913/

645 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 18:00

>>640 I took a break from highlighting my ass syntax to tell you it's "Stroop" not "Stroup"

>>636 This seems like one of those new insignificant things people like to get all tribal about and argue over online...

646 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 18:18

>>645
Seems nobody cared until some dipshit said it was better for your eyes and/or the environment, and suddenly everyone realized light backgrounds makes their eyes hurt and toggling more pixels on a backlit monitor is actually extremely environmentally friendly, even though nobody has actually done any studies on either of these equally stupid hypotheses

647 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 18:30

>>646
Isn't it more stupid to assume that the people who say staring at bright lights in a dark room for a long time hurts their eyes more than dark lights are making it up?

648 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 18:40

>>647
Who said anything about dark rooms? Nevertheless all I'm saying is the most vocal people seem to have only realized it was a problem fairly recently, in unison.

649 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 19:09

My website sucks.

650 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 19:49

>>649
Mine will suck more. Mark my words. I'll show you next Monday.

captcha: shite

651 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 20:54

>>648 people who don't like getting snowblindness at 3 am are all just NPCs I guess

sasuga dqn for the super hot take

652 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 21:03

just fuckin turn a light on tho

653 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 21:04

and dim your screens

654 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 21:11

I think it might just be the "discord light theme" memes spilling over.

655 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9338 23:00

No you have it all wrong. If you're using two monitors, having an IDE open in one monitor and a leisure site with a colorscheme matching your IDE fools everyone into thinking you're working super hard all the time, especially if it's dark since it looks hackery and professional.

Also, I think it happens to coincide with Apple adding dark mode to their HID guidelines, there, that's what happened.

656 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 00:28

I have not noticed any uptick in people bitching about bright themes, but then I used to hang around unpleasant people, like Unix coders, design nuts, people who parrot Maddox, the kind of people who would've seen that argument about how much electricity is wasted by Google on monitors when it came up in 2007, etc.

Twitter, Discord, Mac OS X, Windows are just a few widely used software packages with dark themes.

Also, I wish I had better people to hang around.

657 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 02:25

First it was all about PTSD, now it's all about gaslighting and imposter syndrome...I wonder what the next trendy mental health problem will be?

658 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 06:53

afrogon:
I. non-euclidean polygon consisting of curly-haired edges
II. an occupied lilypad

659 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 12:29

>>657
We must move in different circles; for me, imposter syndrome was a cool new thing a little before PTSD, and is now rather played-out. (We agree on PTSD and gaslighting, though.) I suppose you could throw OCD and bipolar on there as well, farther back.

My bet for the future of casual self-diagnosis is Stockholm Syndrome. If I could choose, though, I'd like to see the Napoleon Complex, except collectively misunderstood as "the delusion that you are Napoleon".

660 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 13:42

What the fuck?

661 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 14:05

>>657
PTSD safe spaces never went away, you just aren't focused on them anymore.

Imposter syndrome is also a really common concern on IT. I've heard about it my entire professional life, which granted is just 5 years, but still.

662 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 15:26

Just remembered that I had a dream about talking to a cute girl and inviting her to dinner and now my day is better now that I recalled this dream

663 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 16:15

I wanna degauss a screen. Just to hear that bwowmp noise and see the image curl up.

664 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 17:09

I should make a CRT degauss simulator. That probably already exists though.

665 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 18:07

Why are you God? I'm God

666 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 18:08

how about widowmaker

667 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 21:09

rare prism for friend points Pepega

668 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 21:44

DE idea: xmona

669 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 22:26

>>661
Imposter syndrome is not issue in IT: most if not all IT/code "professionals" are complete imposters.

670 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 22:35

if harry and voldemort were on the moon and harry fucked voldemort would that be fucked up or what

671 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9339 23:04

>>669
Oh, dunning kruger is also a huge issue

672 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 00:31

oo oo
oowoo

spider noticing your bulge

673 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 01:13

holy fuck i came bricks

captcha: fasp

674 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 01:21

>>657
Claiming to be an asshole because of some cluster B shit that for some reason you're not seeking help for.

675 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 01:38

Shark tits

676 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 02:23

I want any and all of you to teach me how to become functional again. Seems like I'm uncreative, stuck and unhappy (again).

677 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 02:42

Did you hear about the bipolar autistic narcissist Dunning–Kruger who gaslighted a Stockholm Napoleon Imposter so badly he got PTSD? OCDWTFBBQ!

678 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 02:43

realize i should take better care of my teeth -> floss -> my gums are in agony for daring to disturb the gingivitis

679 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 03:05

>>676
your return value must be the the same for the same arguments and your evaluation must have no side effects

680 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 03:35

good night, i'm not over you

681 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 05:07

>>679
i just wanna be pure

682 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 09:14

>>679

>>>/code/

... it's quiet over there is all

683 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 12:44

>>664
I'm pretty sure xscreensaver has one of those.

684 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 13:31

getting really hungry after jerking off like i just ran a mile or something

685 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 13:32

I've seen no degaussing like my old monster monitor did. It went all the way up to 1600x1200, or at least that's what I put it to. I couldn't tell if it could actually handle it. The dots were too small.
Anyway no simulator will simulate it the way I remember it

686 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 17:03

kite ninja yeeting outta nowhere

687 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 17:03

>>685
It's not really a degauss without that slight adrenaline kick from an erroneous belief that you might EMP your own brainwaves, is it?

688 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 18:18

689 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 18:19

ah whoops

690 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 20:46

>>687
Right? You feel that bwromp in your very bones.

691 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 20:57

What's the word I'm looking for - say you read a food critic's review of a new restaurant; you wouldn't call the critic an "authority" on food, but you would expect them to have some higher level of understanding of the game than the people reading their column, of why good restaurants are good and vice versa, more than just "the food was tasty but the room was noisy". What do you call this quality, someone of a higher level of expertise which "gives them the right" to give a more insightful critique and allows the reader to trust their opinion more?

An ideal critic would have an inside-out knowledge of the medium and the context - a movie critic has more credibility if he studied cinematography and journalism, than someone unqualified who blogs about their favourite James Bond films. Their opinions are both valid opinions, but what's the word for being better-equipped to give a more valuable insight?

692 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 21:01

>>691
I might use "clout" in that situation but I feel like that's not quite the right thing either. Expertise?

693 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 21:04

Feels like it's some kind of cross between ethos and experience

694 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 21:27

>>691
"Erudite", "accredited", or "estimable" might serve, depending.

Rhetorically, though, that entire angle might be difficult. I think using a one-word appeal to authority tends to lower credibility rather than raise it, like you're trying to puff up an emperor with a few too many titles and no clothing.

695 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 21:35

>>694
I think "they do this for a living" is more nuanced than a simple appeal to authority. Plus reputation is a valid argument for credibility, unless the audience hasn't actually heard of them.

696 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 23:27

Hmmm I mean more like the position that person is in, rather than an adjective: an esteemed newspaper pays the expert food critic to write a column, the reader turns to this column for guidance on a restaurant's food, it is the critic's duty to serve a knowledgeable piece of reasoned advice for the reader. If the reader hasn't heard of the critic, they can still put some faith in their views because the [position of authority] the esteemed newspaper has put them in should ideally guarantee they know their potatoes.

>>695 they do this for a living which gives them [authority on the subject] ?

697 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9340 23:37

You're doing wonderfully, and I'm very proud of you.

698 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9341 14:59

i've had the phrase "elistist supercuckture" on my mind for a while and i think it's about time i get it off

699 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9341 16:05

fuck me, that's the second time
vc: hottip: proofread your posts

700 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9341 19:01

>>696
Yes, you could hopefully believe that they've put some thought into it (as they're paid to), and their employer endorses them by continuing to pay them for their views

701 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9341 22:07

>>700 Yes, I mean what is the word I'm getting at, it's on the tip of my tongue - it's been bugging me since I first posted...

702 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9341 23:23

We have burned through this thread, I feel like it was made just yesterday.

703 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9341 23:27

I'm alive!

704 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9342 00:12

>>701 I mean, there's a "professional" (which seems to at least have the connotation you seek) who might be "eloquent" (able to explain related matter clearly in profound ways, which is usually a distinguishing mark of an expert opinion).

We could probably get you some pretty fine-tuned words if you said what you wanted to use it for.

705 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9342 00:40

Toy Story toys but they work like Fate servants

706 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9342 04:54

>>698
Yeet...

707 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9342 08:55

>>701
Well it's bugging me too!
Let's just keep talking with >>704 until the word falls out. If there even is one.

708 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9342 19:10

24 years old, i've been a shutin hikki neet for the past 6 years and i'm trying to fix my life

i have a job now and at least have a little bit of money sometimes, sometime soon i'll get a driver's license too

after that i have no fucken idea what i'm supposed to do, how am i supposed to make friends and meet people all that stuff, all that kind of stuff happened at school before

709 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9342 19:29

i ask because dqn(and depression) has been basically the only constant in my life for those 6 years

710 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9342 20:01

>>708

> how am i supposed to make friends and meet people all that stuff, all that kind of stuff happened at school before

Just go to community college, it's socially acceptable to recreate your highschool experience there.

711 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9342 20:17

>>708

> how am i supposed to make friends and meet people all that stuff, all that kind of stuff happened at school before

Legally change your name to Boris von Horace. The more of us, the better.

712 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9343 11:24

Farts then gaslights

713 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9343 18:48

I wonder what's for April Fools Day.

714 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9343 21:09

fricken Oceania/East Asia, being in the future and shit

715 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 05:10

im squeeks

.
..
.
.
....
APRLI FOOOLL!

716 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 05:45

   人     
  (__)    
  (__)   
 ( __ )    
 ( ・∀・) < My name is Squeeks and this thread sucks dick like all of those other "ITT you post right now [ASAP] your current thought [Brains][Thinking][Shark tits][#32] ".
 (つ   つ 
 | | |     
 (__)_)

   人     
  (__)    
  (__)   
 ( __ )    
 ( ・∀・) < Actually, shark tits are pretty awesome.
 (つ   つ 
 | | |     
 (__)_)

717 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 16:50

Let's get sad.

718 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 16:51

Let's get mildly pleased instead.

719 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 16:57

I implore you, gent, let me through, for the gate won't budge. The gate won't budge! We are about to get annihilated!

720 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 19:15

How does IRC, of all things, shit me up the most? I could scream into a passing library and feel less like eating my own foot

721 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 20:53

Let's get mad.

722 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 21:53

Another day, another friend lost

723 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 22:17

way too many 4d's for me

724 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 22:27

liberals: you shouldn't rape ppl
me: 👏MY👏BODY👏MY👏CHOICE👏

725 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9344 23:46

patiently awaiting the day i can break out the "fuck me yourself, you coward" line on someone

726 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 00:03

dilemma: I baked cookies and brought them to work with the intention of sharing with coworkers but now I am feeling greedy and want to eat them all myself.

Now I must choose between deliciously unhealthy self-gratification or gaining esteem in the eyes of my fellow man.

727 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 02:01

is sending unwanted dick pics really that common

728 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 02:35

>>727
I suspect, based on the statistics of how much extramarital sex actually happens, it's more of a pareto / power law thing where like 80% of dudes will never do it, ~20% just have a distorted sense of what's classy with some portion of the top 1% being "why we can't have nice things"... and some statistically small handful are some absolute maniac outliers the police are hopelessly searching for as we speak.

729 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 06:32

My fish just finished reheating, so I've gotta go. I hope you have a happy holiday though. Guantanamo Bay is still open. Good night.
I'm dreaming of a white Christmas~

730 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 09:13

Harmonic Simultaneous 4-day Hinomaru

Your flag is educated stupid. A flag will rotate around 4-corner symmetric metamorphosis.

731 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 09:17

Suffer with me.

732 Name: vc: thowstness : 1993-09-9345 09:42

Hot elf chicks that fetishize mortal men because they get all the wisdom and wrinkly old guy look and shit fast and then they die and you get another one

733 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 11:20

>>727 I never get any at least

734 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 11:26

can't get sent unwanted dick pics if you want them all roll_safe_tapping_head.gif

735 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 11:54

got me there

736 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 13:31

Time worth wasting isn't time.

737 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 19:26

avengers is starting to feel more and more like poohadventures

738 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 22:06

>>725
i just saw that referenced on twitter, someone's going to beat you to the punch I'm sure.

739 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 22:39

>>738 you probably saw it referenced by me, i see twitter and the current thoughts thread as serving a similar function of jotting down random stream of consciousness shite and sometimes i post my current thought in both places tbh

740 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9345 22:41

or more like sometimes i forget what i posted where and it ends up on both

741 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9346 01:07

>>739,740
I suffer from choice paralysis whenever I have some kind of pithy thought and then must decide whether to post it on DQN, SAoVQ, Twitter, Facebook, Discord, or one of my many group chats...it's often hard to guess which audience will receive it best.

742 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9346 04:22

>>741
It sounds like you're sticking to the "one audience even though there's 0 crossover" rule. If so, we are in complete agreement even though it's pointless!

743 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9346 05:57

>>742
I wouldn't want my DQN friends to know I use Discord/etc.

744 Name: (*゚ー゚) : 1993-09-9346 07:59

>>742,743
Yeah, I'm always paranoid that there might be crossover, and that my carefully guarded anonymity will be destroyed. I especially hope nobody I know in real life or DQN ever finds my re**it account, it would be just too embarrassing.

In reality though, I seriously doubt anybody cares enough to notice. Or even if they did notice, they wouldn't give a shit.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.