The problem with fetish art is that it is Gooner content, and therefore is reducible to a basic commodity like any other p‚¸rnographic material. To the Gooner, there is no differentiation between this or that image of 'Sonic Feet Pics', thus, the individual 'Sonic Foot Pic' loses its status as art, and becomes a bare use-value, and enters into a commodity relationship, rather than an artistic one.
What is the implication of this? The main implication is that most Gooner content will be produced by computers, either through artificial intelligence, or through computer-aided templating, or some combination of the two. Original, bespoke works of gooner art with unique themes eventually become sublated by the use-value equivalent which contains those themes. At some point, no new themes can possibly be created. Every possible combination of fetish themes will have been created, and thus, all possible combinations will be sublated by their use-value equivalents, and transformed into replicable commodities. Within 20 years, Gooners will produce all images of this character with computers, each image costing pennies on the dollar. A vast catalogue of diffusion patterns and templates fulfills every desire that a gooner may have.
This doesn't abolish the fetish art, but it does eliminate the primary source of income for those artists.